Re: On DNS for postgresql.org

From: "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: "'Andrew Sullivan'" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: On DNS for postgresql.org
Date: 2006-09-07 01:52:32
Message-ID: 00e501c6d220$4e9ce790$68c8a8c0@lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> I posted this to -general, but more clueful people suggested I should
> truck myself over here. So here I am:
>
> Now that the DNS is back (thanks!), I thought I'd ask why the ra bit
> is set on the responses. Are those servers providing recursion to
> the whole Net? (They seem to be.) If so, that's a Bad Thing.
>
> A

I've restricted RECURSIVE on my NS's, and we're successfully slaving again
from hub's server.

LER

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3683 US

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-09-07 03:07:17 Re: Mailing lists slow ...
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2006-09-07 01:14:38 Re: gBorg status?