> > And MS has more enterprise deployments than RH. Does that make MS
> > better than RH?
>No, but they aren't a toy either - while they are closed source, and
>trying to force you to their world as much as possible and
>freedom (like upgrading your machine when running XP) and a
>blatantly using their force in the desktop market to increase
>of new products (hailstorm, IE, original NT server etc), NT isn't
>a toy anymore.
Excuse me? When did that happen? What year is it?
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Namrata||Date: 2001-06-28 09:13:49|
|Previous:||From: J.H.M. Dassen Ray||Date: 2001-06-28 09:02:37|
|Subject: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL|