Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

From: "Gordan Bobic" <gordan(at)freeuk(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Date: 2001-06-28 09:06:08
Message-ID: 00c901c0ffb1$99c39580$800010ac@localdomain (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
> > And MS has more enterprise deployments than RH.  Does that make MS
> > better than RH?
>
>No, but they aren't a toy either - while they are closed source, and
>trying to force you to their world as much as possible and
restricting
>freedom (like upgrading your machine when running XP) and a
monopolist
>blatantly using their force in the desktop market to increase
adoption
>of new products (hailstorm, IE, original NT server etc), NT isn't
just
>a toy anymore.

Excuse me? When did that happen? What year is it?

Regards.

Gordan



In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: NamrataDate: 2001-06-28 09:13:49
Subject: Bytea?
Previous:From: J.H.M. Dassen RayDate: 2001-06-28 09:02:37
Subject: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group