From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Justin Clift" <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign) |
Date: | 2003-03-11 02:43:21 |
Message-ID: | 00b801c2e777$faeaede0$6500a8c0@fhp.internal |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
> I had been leaning to May 1 beta, but am happy to switch to June 1 if
> you feel that makes an improvement in the odds of completing the Windows
> port. (I think it will also improve the odds of finishing this protocol
> stuff I've taken on...) I don't want to see it pushed further than that
> without good concrete arguments for doing so.
There really is no rush...
I'm well-versed in PostgreSQL, and even I haven't upgraded some of our
production servers to even 7.3 yet (thanks to pg_dump dependency
nightmare)..
BTW, so no-one conflicts, I'm doing up pg_get_triggerdef(oid) at the moment.
Once that's done, I'll be able to submit a redone psql \d output that
includes the trigger definition.
Cheers,
Chris
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-11 02:44:01 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2003-03-11 02:40:49 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-11 02:44:01 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2003-03-11 02:40:49 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |