Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: bacula problem - failures with no error message in postgres?

From: "Phillip Smith" <phillip(dot)smith(at)weatherbeeta(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "'Bernhard D Rohrer'" <graylion(at)sm-wg(dot)net>,<pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bacula problem - failures with no error message in postgres?
Date: 2008-03-30 23:24:13
Message-ID: 008f01c892bd$2a0ae350$9b0014ac@wbaus090 (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
> even on the higher debug levels I am not seeing thing in the postgres logs
Are you increasing the debug levels of Bacula or of Postgres? You'll need to
look in the PG logs and increase their verbosity.


THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT - Save paper if you don't really need to print this

*******************Confidentiality and Privilege Notice*******************

The material contained in this message is privileged and confidential to
the addressee.  If you are not the addressee indicated in this message or
responsible for delivery of the message to such person, you may not copy
or deliver this message to anyone, and you should destroy it and kindly
notify the sender by reply email.

Information in this message that does not relate to the official business
of Weatherbeeta must be treated as neither given nor endorsed by Weatherbeeta.
Weatherbeeta, its employees, contractors or associates shall not be liable
for direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from transmission of this
message or any attachments
e-mail.

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Phillip SmithDate: 2008-03-30 23:34:18
Subject: Re: weird network issue
Previous:From: Bernhard D RohrerDate: 2008-03-30 20:36:18
Subject: bacula problem - failures with no error message in postgres?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group