----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Chalmers <robert(at)chalmers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: psql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 1999 8:51 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] RE: ODBC question on R+w and +r only. solved
>Hmmm. Just gave all permisions to user, and created a NEW table database in
>Access, and it imported the new permissions.
>It seems that Access imports the permissions, and then doesn't let you
>them, even when they have been changed in the pgsql system.
>not a bad idea I usppose.
>Now to work out the correct permissions that the ODBC driver should run
>I notice there is [x]Read Only field in the config... should it be on/offf
>what are the ramifications of that side of it?
The next build of the driver will be more permissive in its defaults.
These conservitive settings go back to the days when ODBC updates were a
flip of a coin.
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: David Giffin||Date: 1999-01-21 19:54:14|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Multiple Postgres Instances|
|Previous:||From: Dan Warren||Date: 1999-01-21 16:48:22|
|Subject: Newbie interface question|