> There is risk here.  It isn't so much in the fact that PostgreSQL, Inc
> is doing a couple of modest closed-source things with the code.  After
> all, the PG community has long acknowleged that the BSD license would
> allow others to co-op the code and commercialize it with no obligations.
> 
> It is rather sad to see PG, Inc. take the first step in this direction.
> 
> How long until the entire code base gets co-opted?

I totaly missed your point here. How closing source of ERserver is related
to closing code of PostgreSQL DB server? Let me clear things:

1. ERserver isn't based on WAL. It will work with any version >= 6.5

2. WAL was partially sponsored by my employer, Sectorbase.com,
not by PG, Inc.

Vadim

In response to

• Re: beta testing version at 2000-12-03 06:06:01 from Don Baccus

Responses

• Re: beta testing version at 2000-12-03 15:44:06 from Don Baccus
• Re: beta testing version at 2000-12-05 19:23:40 from Martin A. Marques

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Billy G. Allie	Date: 2000-12-03 07:25:26
	Subject: Re: compiling pg 7.0.3 on sco 5.0.5
Previous:	From: Don Baccus	Date: 2000-12-03 06:21:18
	Subject: Re: beta testing version