Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WAL status update

From: "Vadim Mikheev" <vmikheev(at)sectorbase(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'The Hermit Hacker'" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WAL status update
Date: 2000-11-02 17:43:40
Message-ID: 001201c044f4$703b0900$b97a30d0@sectorbase.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM> writes:
> > I think that at least 1 & 2 from WAL todo (checkpoints and port to
> > machines without TAS) is required before beta.
> 
> I'm not sure that you do need to add support for machines without TAS.
> I pointed out a couple months ago that the non-TAS support code hasn't
> even compiled for the past release or three, and proposed ripping it
> all out rather than fixing code that clearly isn't being used.
> No one objected.
> 
> I haven't got round to doing the ripping yet, but as far as I know
> there is no reason to expend work on adding more code for the non-TAS
> case.

Oh, it's great! Thanks!
one todo item is gone -:)

> I have a few other things I still need to do before 7.1 beta.  Do you
> think you'll be ready in, say, a week?

yes.

Vadim



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-11-02 17:46:36
Subject: Re: More cvs branch problems
Previous:From: Jade RubickDate: 2000-11-02 17:26:50
Subject: Another remove request

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group