Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

RE: [INTERFACES] ORB API

From: "Taral" <taral(at)cyberjunkie(dot)com>
To: "Aleksey Demakov" <avd(at)gcom(dot)ru>, <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ORB API
Date: 1998-11-16 15:29:46
Message-ID: 000601be1175$f0ed9360$8a14f7d0@taral.dobiecenter.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
> I believe that ORBit is the best candidate, though it's not yet
> complete and its ability to interoperate with other implementations
> is to be proven. But unlike others it doesn't require egcs or
> OS thread support (omniORB). It is intended for real work, not
> for education (mico). It is in active development wich we can
> join to.

But does it fully support the basic CORBA 2.2 API *right now*? The point of
using mico was that we can easily switch ORBs later on since the 2.2 API is
so specific.

Example:

omniORB does not use the 2.2 perform_work()/run() functions, but instead has
an extension to the impl_is_ready() function. Although their implementation
is valid under 2.0, it is *not* valid under 2.2.

Taral


In response to

Responses

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Michael RobinsonDate: 1998-11-16 15:31:03
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Updated IDL with considerations for COSS
Previous:From: Byron NikolaidisDate: 1998-11-16 14:57:06
Subject: Re: a problem with Byron's latest source release of psqlodbc

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group