RE: pgsql/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1 (DatabaseMetaData.java)

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Bruce Momjian - CVS" <momjian(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: pgsql/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1 (DatabaseMetaData.java)
Date: 2000-09-12 23:46:39
Message-ID: 000301c01d13$b1d53ce0$2801007e@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Behalf Of Bruce Momjian - CVS
>

[snip]

- ----------------------------- Log Message -----------------------------
>
> As if my JDBC patch hasn't already caused enough grief, there is now a
> one-line change necessary. Due to the Mark Holloman "New Relkind for
> Views" patch, my support for views in the driver will need to be updated
> to match. The change to DatabaseMetaData.getTableTypes[][] is as
> follows:
>
> - {"VIEW", "(relkind='r' and relhasrules='t' and relname !~
> '^pg_' and relname !~ '^xinv')"},
> + {"VIEW", "(relkind='v' and relname !~ '^pg_' and relname
> !~ '^xinv')"},
>

Current jdbc driver seems to be able to get no VIEW information
from any RELEASE version of backends.

Hmm,it seems that client app/libs don't mind backward incompatibility.
Don't I have to bother about backward incomatibility which would be
caused by my change ?
If so,I would commit my change about ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN.

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-09-12 23:59:12 Re: [HACKERS] RE: pgsql/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1 (DatabaseMetaData.java)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian - CVS 2000-09-12 21:12:46 pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref (set.sgml vacuum.sgml)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-09-12 23:59:12 Re: [HACKERS] RE: pgsql/src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1 (DatabaseMetaData.java)
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-09-12 23:40:05 RE: Status of new relation file naming