Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:48:51PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2020-Mar-30, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I wonder if we should force reuse_previous to false if there's
>>> no o_conn, rather than fixing this stuff piecemeal.
>> That was my impression too.
> Good point. What do you think about the attached then?
WFM.
regards, tom lane