Re: BUG #15804: Assertion failure when using logging_collector with EXEC_BACKEND

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Yuli Khodorkovskiy <yuli(dot)khodorkovskiy(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BUG #15804: Assertion failure when using logging_collector with EXEC_BACKEND
Date: 2019-05-16 02:59:38
Message-ID: 20190516025938.keukenlt74x2ujz4@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hi,

On 2019-05-16 11:19:03 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> So it seems that reverting 57431a91 is an option on the table?
> Opinions?

Seems a bit early to go that way. Given that this bug was reported
yesterday, and that there's reasonable sketches how to fix this, I'm not
clear why reverting would already be on the table?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-05-16 03:26:19 Re: inconsistent results querying table partitioned by date
Previous Message David Rowley 2019-05-16 02:52:31 Re: inconsistent results querying table partitioned by date