From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Martin Liška <marxin(dot)liska(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #15121: Multiple UBSAN errors |
Date: | 2018-03-19 18:41:23 |
Message-ID: | 11474.1521484883@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2018-03-19 14:20:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I tried -O3 with gcc 7.3.1 (Fedora 26), and that passes check-world
>> just fine. Then I tried -O3 with gcc 8.0.1 (prerelease Fedora 28),
>> and indeed that's got some problems.
>> Note that 1-D and 2-D arrays print fine, it's only 3-D or deeper
>> that print wrong. Very odd. Maybe it's bad code on our part,
>> but I think the odds are at least as good that it's a new gcc bug.
> Might be worth trying with a new clang, I think it's been a bit ahead on
> the quality of the ubsan (et al) integration quality.
I'm not talking about ubsan, I'm just talking about whether our regression
tests pass with the higher -O level.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Liška | 2018-03-19 18:43:39 | Re: BUG #15121: Multiple UBSAN errors |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-19 18:27:05 | Re: BUG #15121: Multiple UBSAN errors |