Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-ports - December 2005

2005-12-02

• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (02:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (03:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (03:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (03:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (03:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (04:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Peter Eisentraut (08:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (14:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Andrew Dunstan (15:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Chris Browne (17:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (17:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (18:23)
• Re: AIX Permission weirdness Seneca Cunningham (18:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (18:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (18:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (18:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (18:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (18:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Joshua D. Drake (19:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (20:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Joshua D. Drake (20:27)

2005-12-03

• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Peter Eisentraut (11:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (13:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Peter Eisentraut (14:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (14:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Michael Paesold (15:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (15:27)

2005-12-04

• Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (03:52)
• building GIST indexes on Complex data type Mogin Mohandas (10:02)
• Attention of all PostgreSQL 8.1.0-2 Windows Installer Ilias Goudaropoulos (12:33)
• Re: Attention of all PostgreSQL 8.1.0-2 Windows Installer Magnus Hagander (12:42)
• Re: Attention of all PostgreSQL 8.1.0-2 Windows Installer Ilias Goudaropoulos (19:45)

2005-12-07

• PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages Richard van den Berg (11:14)
• Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages Devrim GUNDUZ (11:34)
• Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages Martijn van Oosterhout (13:06)
• Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages Richard van den Berg (13:15)
• Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages Devrim GUNDUZ (13:54)
• Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages Martijn van Oosterhout (14:22)
• Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages Tom Lane (14:48)
• Re: Attention of all PostgreSQL 8.1.0-2 Windows Installer Magnus Hagander (14:54)
• Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages Stephen Frost (15:37)

2005-12-12

• Re: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages Richard van den Berg (08:41)

2005-12-13

• Re: Bug#342369: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible packages Anand Kumria (08:16)
• Re: Bug#342369: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible Stephan Szabo (15:26)
• Re: Bug#342369: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible Stephen Frost (16:06)
• Re: Bug#342369: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible Martin Pitt (17:26)
• Re: Bug#342369: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible Stephan Szabo (17:49)
• Re: Bug#342369: PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RHEL / Debian incompatible Tom Lane (18:03)

2005-12-16

• Postgresql 7.3.4 on Mac OS X (processor i386) Shyam Sunder (22:43)

2005-12-19

• Compiling postgresql on Mac Intel machines Nishant (08:58)

2005-12-20

• Re: Attention of all PostgreSQL 8.1.0-2 Windows Installer Ilias Goudaropoulos (00:28)
• 'point' test suite failure on arm Martin Pitt (11:18)
• 'stats' test suite failure on s390 Martin Pitt (11:23)
• Re: 'stats' test suite failure on s390 Tom Lane (15:00)
• Re: 'stats' test suite failure on s390 Martin Pitt (15:18)
• Re: 'point' test suite failure on arm Tom Lane (16:29)
• Re: 'point' test suite failure on arm Martin Pitt (16:45)
• Re: 'point' test suite failure on arm Jim C. Nasby (21:37)

2005-12-21

• Re: 'point' test suite failure on arm Martin Pitt (07:26)
• Problem Installing on Windows 2000 Server Kent Morrison (17:46)
• Re: Problem Installing on Windows 2000 Server Magnus Hagander (19:06)
• Re: Problem Installing on Windows 2000 Server Kent Morrison (19:23)
• Re: Problem Installing on Windows 2000 Server Magnus Hagander (20:08)
• Re: Problem Installing on Windows 2000 Server Kent Morrison (21:12)
• Re: Compiling postgresql on Mac Intel machines Brian A. Seklecki (23:40)

2005-12-22

• Re: 'point' test suite failure on arm Bruce Momjian (00:19)