Skip site navigation
(1)
Skip section navigation
(2)
Search
Peripheral Links
Text Size:
Normal
/
Large
Donate
Contact
Home
About
Download
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Your account
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
User lists
pgsql-admin
pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-announce
pgsql-bugs
pgsql-docs
pgsql-general
pgsql-interfaces
pgsql-jobs
pgsql-novice
pgsql-performance
pgsql-php
pgsql-sql
pgsql-students
Developer lists
Regional lists
Associations
User groups
Project lists
Inactive lists
IRC
Featured Users
International Sites
Propaganda
Resources
Weekly News
pgsql-performance - April 2011
Search archives
(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search
Prev
|
Next
Jump to day:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
2011-04-01
index usage on queries on inherited tables
Joseph Shraibman (00:41)
table contraints checks only happen in planner phase
Joseph Shraibman (00:41)
Re: good old VACUUM FULL
Craig Ringer (03:41)
Re: COPY with high # of clients, partitioned table locking issues?
Greg Smith (06:50)
Re: table contraints checks only happen in planner phase
Josh Berkus (17:32)
2011-04-02
C on Client versus C on Server
Eliot Gable (18:52)
2011-04-03
Re: C on Client versus C on Server
Heikki Linnakangas (07:01)
2011-04-04
Re: very long updates very small tables
Lars Feistner (08:11)
Postgres Performance Tuning
Adarsh Sharma (09:40)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
tv (10:28)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Adarsh Sharma (10:39)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Scott Marlowe (10:43)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Sethu Prasad (10:52)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Scott Marlowe (10:54)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Raghavendra (10:56)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Adarsh Sharma (11:34)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Scott Marlowe (11:43)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Adarsh Sharma (11:51)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Achilleas Mantzios (12:14)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Scott Marlowe (12:14)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
tv (12:28)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Raghavendra (12:30)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Adarsh Sharma (12:33)
Re: very long updates very small tables
Kevin Grittner (14:32)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Scott Marlowe (16:22)
2011-04-05
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Greg Smith (01:26)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Adarsh Sharma (07:33)
Which is better Index
Adarsh Sharma (10:26)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Ákos Gábriel (12:31)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Ákos Gábriel (12:38)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Scott Marlowe (13:08)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Adarsh Sharma (13:20)
Re: Postgres Performance Tuning
Scott Marlowe (13:49)
Re: Which is better Index
Chetan Suttraway (14:07)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Merlin Moncure (14:07)
help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
Maria L. Wilson (19:25)
Partial index slower than regular index
Thom Brown (22:35)
Re: Partial index slower than regular index
Kenneth Marshall (23:02)
Re: Partial index slower than regular index
Scott Marlowe (23:31)
Re: Partial index slower than regular index
Mark Kirkwood (23:40)
2011-04-06
Re: Partial index slower than regular index
Mark Kirkwood (02:03)
Re: Partial index slower than regular index
Tom Lane (04:44)
Re: Which is better Index
Greg Smith (06:55)
Re: Partial index slower than regular index
Thom Brown (08:15)
Re: Partial index slower than regular index
Thom Brown (08:33)
Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
Szymon Guz (11:41)
Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
tv (13:16)
Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
Maria L. Wilson (13:33)
Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
Maria L. Wilson (13:36)
Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
Kevin Grittner (15:33)
Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
Maria L. Wilson (15:37)
Re: help speeding up a query in postgres 8.4.5
Tomas Vondra (18:13)
Re: very long updates very small tables
Tomas Vondra (18:30)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Scott Carey (20:52)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Andy (21:11)
Background fsck
Ireneusz Pluta (22:33)
Re: Background fsck
Scott Marlowe (22:48)
Re: Background fsck
Ireneusz Pluta (22:59)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
gnuoytr (23:03)
2011-04-07
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Scott Carey (00:05)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Scott Carey (00:10)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Scott Carey (00:20)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Scott Carey (00:22)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Scott Carey (00:42)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
David Rees (01:07)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Greg Smith (01:32)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Greg Smith (02:21)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
David Boreham (02:56)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
gnuoytr (03:19)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
David Boreham (03:52)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Jesper Krogh (04:27)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Greg Smith (05:48)
Re: Partial index slower than regular index
Tom Lane (06:37)
Re: Partial index slower than regular index
Thom Brown (07:10)
Re: Partial index slower than regular index
Thom Brown (08:01)
Re: Background fsck
Ivan Voras (13:31)
Re: Background fsck
Achilleas Mantzios (14:01)
Re: Background fsck
Greg Smith (16:16)
Re: Intel SSDs that may not suck
Scott Carey (16:25)
2011-04-08
Re: Background fsck
Ireneusz Pluta (05:55)
Re: Background fsck
Achilleas Mantzios (06:19)
Re: Background fsck
Scott Marlowe (06:22)
Re: Background fsck
Ireneusz Pluta (09:34)
Re: Background fsck
Ivan Voras (10:21)
Re: Background fsck
Ireneusz Pluta (11:52)
Re: Background fsck
Ireneusz Pluta (11:53)
Re: Background fsck
Achilleas Mantzios (12:14)
[No subject]
Whatever Deep (14:08)
Re: Background fsck
Jochen Erwied (14:32)
postgresql benchmark
Radhya sahal (14:44)
Re: Why it is using/not using index scan?
Merlin Moncure (15:45)
Re: Background fsck
Ireneusz Pluta (16:12)
2011-04-09
Slow query postgres 8.3
Anne Rosset (01:29)
Re: Slow query postgres 8.3
tv (10:35)
Re: Why it is using/not using index scan?
Tomas Vondra (14:59)
Multiple index builds on same table - in one sweep?
Chris Ruprecht (16:28)
Re: Multiple index builds on same table - in one sweep?
Tom Lane (17:10)
Re: Multiple index builds on same table - in one sweep?
Chris Ruprecht (17:23)
2011-04-10
optimizer parameters
Radhya sahal (18:22)
Re: optimizer parameters
Tomas Vondra (23:27)
2011-04-11
Re: Multiple index builds on same table - in one sweep?
Greg Smith (02:29)
Re: optimizer parameters
Greg Smith (02:40)
Re: Multiple index builds on same table - in one sweep?
Scott Marlowe (05:35)
Re: Multiple index builds on same table - in one sweep?
Scott Marlowe (07:31)
Re: Multiple index builds on same table - in one sweep?
Greg Smith (07:41)
Re: Multiple index builds on same table - in one sweep?
Scott Marlowe (07:57)
Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Glyn Astill (13:04)
Postgres 9 slave lagging
Saurabh Agrawal (14:10)
Re: Multiple index builds on same table - in one sweep?
Shaun Thomas (15:13)
Re: Slow query postgres 8.3
Anne Rosset (16:07)
Re: Slow query postgres 8.3
Kevin Grittner (16:59)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Kevin Grittner (18:09)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Joshua D. Drake (18:12)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Glyn Astill (18:23)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Scott Marlowe (18:32)
Re: Multiple index builds on same table - in one sweep?
Tom Lane (18:39)
Re: Multiple index builds on same table - in one sweep?
Scott Marlowe (18:39)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Scott Marlowe (19:29)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Glyn Astill (19:42)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Steve Clark (19:51)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Jesper Krogh (19:56)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
david (20:04)
Poor performance when joining against inherited tables
Lucas Madar (20:11)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Glyn Astill (20:17)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
James Cloos (20:39)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Scott Marlowe (20:52)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Kevin Grittner (21:06)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Glyn Astill (21:08)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Kevin Grittner (21:35)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
David Rees (22:11)
Re: Postgres 9 slave lagging
Merlin Moncure (22:39)
how explain works
Radhya sahal (23:02)
Re: how explain works
Nathan Boley (23:09)
Re: how explain works to Mr Nathan Boley
Radhya sahal (23:22)
Two servers - One Replicated - Same query
Ozer, Pam (23:28)
2011-04-12
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
mark (00:05)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Scott Marlowe (00:18)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Scott Marlowe (00:18)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
mark (00:50)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Merlin Moncure (01:59)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Scott Marlowe (02:12)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Jesper Krogh (05:17)
performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
Dieter Rehbein (05:20)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Scott Marlowe (05:55)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Arjen van der Meijden (07:31)
Re: Slow query postgres 8.3
Claudio Freire (07:33)
Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
Claudio Freire (07:42)
DBT-5 & Postgres 9.0.3
Sethu Prasad (07:51)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Glyn Astill (08:54)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Glyn Astill (08:57)
Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
Dieter Rehbein (08:59)
Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
Claudio Freire (09:07)
Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
tv (09:33)
Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
Dieter Rehbein (09:36)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Glyn Astill (12:35)
Re: Poor performance when joining against inherited tables
Shaun Thomas (13:22)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Merlin Moncure (13:23)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Merlin Moncure (13:24)
Re: Two servers - One Replicated - Same query
Kevin Grittner (14:32)
Re: performance problem with LIMIT (order BY in DESC order). Wrong index used?
Tom Lane (14:38)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Kevin Grittner (14:43)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Glyn Astill (16:01)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Glyn Astill (16:07)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Merlin Moncure (16:12)
Performance
Ogden (16:36)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Kevin Grittner (16:40)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Claudio Freire (16:43)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
F. BROUARD / SQLpro (16:58)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Greg Smith (17:00)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Greg Smith (17:10)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Merlin Moncure (17:14)
Re: Performance
Andreas Kretschmer (17:18)
Re: Performance
Ogden (17:23)
Re: Performance
Tomas Vondra (18:16)
Re: Performance
Ogden (18:28)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Strange, John W (18:50)
Re: Performance
Tomas Vondra (21:09)
Re: Performance
Ogden (21:19)
Re: Performance
Tomas Vondra (22:36)
poor execution plan because column dependence
Václav Ovsík (23:23)
2011-04-13
Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
Bob Lunney (00:14)
Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
Tom Lane (00:52)
Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
Václav Ovsík (07:55)
Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
Václav Ovsík (08:21)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Glyn Astill (09:48)
Re: Performance
Ogden (14:05)
Re: Performance
tv (14:14)
Re: Performance
Kevin Grittner (14:32)
Re: poor execution plan because column dependence
Tom Lane (16:24)
Re: Linux: more cores = less concurrency.
Scott Carey (16:33)
Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
Scott Carey (17:07)
Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
Scott Carey (17:22)
Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
Tom Lane (17:35)
Re: HashJoin order, hash the large or small table? Postgres likes to hash the big one, why?
Scott Carey (18:27)
Re: Slow query postgres 8.3
Tomas Vondra (20:16)
Re: how explain works to Mr Nathan Boley
Tomas Vondra (20:19)
Re: Performance
Claudio Freire (21:17)
Re: Slow query postgres 8.3
Claudio Freire (21:37)
Re: Performance
Tom Lane (21:52)
Re: Performance
Claudio Freire (21:54)
Prev
|
Next
Jump to day:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Privacy Policy
|
About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group