Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open source database.

pgsql-performance - April 2009

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30

2009-04-01

Re: Raid 10 chunksize Mark Kirkwood (07:57)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Mark Kirkwood (08:11)
PostgreSQL Mahu Vasile (09:10)
Re: How to get parallel restore in PG 8.4 to work? henk de wit (12:22)
Re: How to get parallel restore in PG 8.4 to work? Tom Lane (13:46)
Re: PostgreSQL Robert Haas (14:23)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Stef Telford (14:39)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Greg Smith (16:08)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Stef Telford (16:15)
self join revisited Rikard Pavelic (16:30)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Marlowe (16:41)
Re: self join revisited Matthew Wakeling (16:46)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Stef Telford (16:48)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Matthew Wakeling (16:51)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Marlowe (16:54)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Matthew Wakeling (17:01)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Marlowe (17:04)
Re: Very specialised query Matthew Wakeling (17:10)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Stef Telford (17:10)
Re: self join revisited Tom Lane (17:19)
Re: Very specialised query Matthew Wakeling (17:33)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Greg Smith (17:49)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Matthew Wakeling (17:54)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Marlowe (17:58)
Re: Very specialised query Matthew Wakeling (18:27)
Re: self join revisited Rikard Pavelic (18:41)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Stef Telford (19:51)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize david (20:38)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Stef Telford (20:44)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize david (20:47)
Re: self join revisited Robert Haas (21:14)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Carey (22:07)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Carey (22:14)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Carey (22:15)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Carey (22:35)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize david (22:59)

2009-04-02

Re: Raid 10 chunksize Mark Kirkwood (06:19)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Mark Kirkwood (06:31)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Greg Smith (08:53)
Re: Very specialised query Matthew Wakeling (15:02)
Re: Very specialised query Craig Ringer (16:36)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Merlin Moncure (17:58)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize James Mansion (19:16)
Re: How to get parallel restore in PG 8.4 to work? henk de wit (20:18)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Carey (20:20)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Merlin Moncure (20:27)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Carey (20:34)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Carey (20:44)
Re: 8.4 Performance improvements: was Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4 Bruce Momjian (23:08)

2009-04-03

Re: Raid 10 chunksize Ron Mayer (00:10)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Hannes Dorbath (08:19)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Mark Kirkwood (08:53)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Greg Smith (09:29)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Greg Smith (09:53)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Greg Smith (10:30)
Rewriting using rules for performance Matthew Wakeling (13:17)
plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (13:32)
Re: Rewriting using rules for performance Robert Haas (13:46)
Re: plpgsql arrays Robert Haas (13:47)
Re: Rewriting using rules for performance Matthew Wakeling (13:55)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (13:57)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (14:04)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (14:08)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (14:14)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (14:24)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (14:28)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (14:45)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (14:48)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (14:58)
Re: plpgsql arrays Merlin Moncure (15:02)
Re: plpgsql arrays Merlin Moncure (15:09)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (15:15)
Re: plpgsql arrays Merlin Moncure (15:18)
Re: Rewriting using rules for performance Merlin Moncure (15:52)
Re: Rewriting using rules for performance Merlin Moncure (15:59)
Re: plpgsql arrays Simon Riggs (17:30)
Re: plpgsql arrays Alvaro Herrera (17:33)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (17:38)
Re: plpgsql arrays Nathan Boley (19:03)
Question on pgbench output David Kerr (19:53)
Re: Question on pgbench output Tom Lane (20:43)
Re: Question on pgbench output David Kerr (21:18)
Re: Question on pgbench output Scott Marlowe (21:43)
Re: Question on pgbench output Greg Smith (21:51)
Re: Question on pgbench output Tom Lane (22:30)
Re: Question on pgbench output Tom Lane (22:52)
Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Josh Berkus (23:12)
Re: Question on pgbench output David Kerr (23:34)
Re: Question on pgbench output David Kerr (23:47)

2009-04-04

Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Josh Berkus (00:09)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize david (01:05)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Greg Smith (02:26)
Re: Question on pgbench output Greg Smith (02:35)
Re: Raid 10 chunksize Scott Carey (05:24)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns henk de wit (10:00)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Jesper Krogh (10:49)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns henk de wit (15:54)
Re: Strange behavior: pgbench and new Linux kernels Greg Smith (16:07)
Re: Strange behavior: pgbench and new Linux kernels Josh Berkus (18:55)
Re: Strange behavior: pgbench and new Linux kernels Greg Smith (20:11)

2009-04-05

Re: Question on pgbench output David Kerr (04:06)
Re: Question on pgbench output Simon Riggs (07:01)
Re: Question on pgbench output Tom Lane (15:46)
Re: Question on pgbench output David Kerr (17:12)
Re: Question on pgbench output Tom Lane (17:43)
Best replication solution? Lists (18:36)
Re: Best replication solution? Lists (21:57)
difficulties with time based queries Rainer Mager (23:26)
Re: difficulties with time based queries David Wilson (23:46)
Re: difficulties with time based queries PFC (23:54)

2009-04-06

Re: difficulties with time based queries Tom Lane (00:12)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Rainer Mager (01:26)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Tom Lane (01:33)
Re: Best replication solution? Greg Sabino Mullane (02:11)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Rainer Mager (03:35)
probelm with alter table add constraint...... roopasatish (06:54)
Re: Best replication solution? Heikki Linnakangas (08:26)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Robert Haas (10:37)
Re: probelm with alter table add constraint...... Robert Haas (10:43)
Re: probelm with alter table add constraint...... Albe Laurenz (10:47)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (11:47)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance Mario Splivalo (12:20)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Matthew Wakeling (12:24)
Re: Best replication solution? Andrew Sullivan (12:35)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (12:52)
Re: probelm with alter table add constraint...... Tom Lane (13:54)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance Scott Marlowe (13:58)
Re: plpgsql arrays Robert Haas (14:36)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance Mario Splivalo (14:37)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance Scott Marlowe (14:47)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance Mario Splivalo (14:50)
Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance Scott Marlowe (15:22)

2009-04-07

Re: Best replication solution? Lists (03:44)
Re: Best replication solution? Lists (04:07)
Re: Best replication solution? Dimitri Fontaine (09:35)
Re: Best replication solution? Ivan Voras (10:11)
Re: Best replication solution? Mark Kirkwood (10:31)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (15:18)
Re: plpgsql arrays justin (15:23)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (15:33)
Re: plpgsql arrays justin (15:45)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (16:08)
Re: Best replication solution? Andrew Sullivan (16:21)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (16:22)
Re: Best replication solution? Andrew Sullivan (17:18)
determining the locks that will be held by a query Brian Cox (18:05)
Re: plpgsql arrays Merlin Moncure (19:24)
Re: plpgsql arrays Tom Lane (19:31)
Re: 8.4 Performance improvements: was Re: Proposal of tunable fix for scalability of 8.4 Bruce Momjian (22:49)

2009-04-08

Re: Best replication solution? Mark Kirkwood (07:15)
Re: plpgsql arrays Matthew Wakeling (10:35)
Re: Best replication solution? Marinos Yannikos (11:45)
bad query plans for ~ "^string" (and like "string%") (8.3.6) Marinos Yannikos (13:42)
Re: bad query plans for ~ "^string" (and like "string%") (8.3.6) Marinos Yannikos (13:50)
Re: bad query plans for ~ "^string" (and like "string%") (8.3.6) Robert Haas (13:53)
Re: bad query plans for ~ "^string" (and like "string%") (8.3.6) Tom Lane (14:28)
Re: Best replication solution? Jeff (18:20)
Re: Best replication solution? Dimitri Fontaine (20:46)
Nested query performance issue Glenn Maynard (21:09)
Re: Nested query performance issue Віталій Тимчишин (21:30)
Re: Nested query performance issue Glenn Maynard (21:54)
Re: difficulties with time based queries Rainer Mager (22:49)

2009-04-09

Re: Nested query performance issue Віталій Тимчишин (09:25)
Re: Nested query performance issue Heikki Linnakangas (11:29)
Re: Best replication solution? Jeff (12:19)
linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Mark Wong (14:00)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Kevin Grittner (14:09)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (14:27)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Matthew Wakeling (14:32)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (14:39)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Kevin Grittner (14:40)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Arjen van der Meijden (14:42)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Kevin Grittner (14:42)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Matthew Wakeling (14:47)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz (14:48)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Mark Wong (14:53)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Kevin Grittner (14:57)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Mark Wong (15:09)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Scott Carey (22:50)
Re: Nested query performance issue Glenn Maynard (23:42)
Re: Nested query performance issue Glenn Maynard (23:42)
Re: Nested query performance issue Greg Smith (23:59)

2009-04-10

Re: difficulties with time based queries Tom Lane (05:20)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Josh Berkus (05:41)
Re: Nested query performance issue Glenn Maynard (06:11)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Mark Kirkwood (06:26)
Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Josh Berkus (06:43)
Re: linux deadline i/o elevator tuning Albe Laurenz *EXTERN* (06:47)
Postgres 8.x on Windows Server in production Ognjen Blagojevic (09:47)
Re: Nested query performance issue Tom Lane (13:42)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Tom Lane (13:50)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Joshua D. Drake (16:00)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Josh Berkus (17:07)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Josh Berkus (17:10)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Scott Carey (17:11)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Josh Berkus (17:15)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Tom Lane (17:19)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Josh Berkus (17:31)
Re: Using IOZone to simulate DB access patterns Scott Carey (17:40)
Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans? Josh Berkus (17:46)

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group