Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open source database.

pgsql-performance - January 2007

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

2007-01-01

Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14 Rolf Østvik (15:04)
Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14 Rolf Østvik (15:14)
Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14 Rolf Østvik (15:19)
Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14 Tom Lane (23:30)

2007-01-02

glibc double-free error Craig A. James (01:29)
Re: glibc double-free error Tom Lane (01:39)
Re: glibc double-free error Craig A. James (06:03)
Re: glibc double-free error Tom Lane (06:11)
what work_mem needs a query needs? Arnau (09:55)
Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14 Rolf Østvik (12:45)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Geoffrey (14:04)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Ragnar (14:54)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Lars Heidieker (14:55)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Jeremy Haile (14:58)
Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14 Tom Lane (15:07)
Config parameters Jeremy Haile (16:22)
Re: Config parameters Richard Huxton (16:34)
Slow dump? Erik Jones (16:41)
Re: Config parameters Jeremy Haile (17:06)
Re: Slow dump? Tom Lane (17:30)
Re: Slow dump? Erik Jones (17:40)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Jeff Davis (18:36)
Re: Config parameters Richard Huxton (18:49)
Re: Config parameters Jeremy Haile (19:19)
Re: Config parameters Scott Marlowe (19:51)
Re: Config parameters Jeremy Haile (20:01)
More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Erik Jones (21:59)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Richard Huxton (22:06)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Erik Jones (22:16)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Tom Lane (23:09)

2007-01-03

Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14 Rolf Østvik (08:01)
Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14 Tom Lane (15:31)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Erik Jones (16:13)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Tom Lane (16:24)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Erik Jones (16:40)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Guillaume Smet (16:50)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Tom Lane (16:56)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Erik Jones (17:10)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Erik Jones (17:15)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Tom Lane (17:21)
Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux Jeremy Haile (17:24)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Erik Jones (17:58)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Tom Lane (18:26)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Erik Jones (18:59)
Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux Magnus Hagander (23:18)
Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux Dimitri Fontaine (23:46)

2007-01-04

Trivial function query optimized badly Craig A. James (03:11)
Re: Trivial function query optimized badly Adam Rich (04:17)
Re: Trivial function query optimized badly Craig A. James (05:42)
Re: Trivial function query optimized badly Tom Lane (05:46)
Re: Trivial function query optimized badly Craig A. James (06:57)
Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux Jeremy Haile (14:27)
Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux Jeremy Haile (14:46)
Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux Tom Lane (15:23)
Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux Jeremy Haile (15:29)
PostgreSQL to host e-mail? Charles A. Landemaine (18:00)
PostgreSQL to host e-mail? Charles A. Landemaine (18:04)
Re: PostgreSQL to host e-mail? Frank Wiles (18:08)
Re: PostgreSQL to host e-mail? Joshua D. Drake (18:11)
Re: PostgreSQL to host e-mail? Matthew Schumacher (18:42)
Slow Query on Postgres 8.2 Dave Dutcher (23:31)

2007-01-05

Re: Slow Query on Postgres 8.2 Tom Lane (01:12)
Re: Slow Query on Postgres 8.2 Adam Rich (01:19)
Re: Slow Query on Postgres 8.2 Dave Dutcher (01:51)
Re: Slow Query on Postgres 8.2 Dave Dutcher (02:01)
Re: Slow Query on Postgres 8.2 Tom Lane (03:04)
Re: PostgreSQL to host e-mail? Grega Bremec (03:10)
Partitioning Arnau (11:02)
Re: Partitioning Mikael Carneholm (11:47)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Erik Jones (18:02)
Re: PostgreSQL to host e-mail? Reid Thompson (18:15)
Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14 Rolf Østvik (18:28)

2007-01-06

Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Guy Rouillier (02:51)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Craig A. James (03:14)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Dave Cramer (04:05)
Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14 Simon Riggs (10:17)
Missing the point of autovacuum Daryl Herzmann (18:59)
Re: Missing the point of autovacuum Tobias Brox (19:33)
Re: Missing the point of autovacuum Tom Lane (19:46)

2007-01-07

Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Guy Rouillier (04:22)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Guy Rouillier (04:32)
table partioning performance Colin Taylor (04:37)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Joshua D. Drake (04:56)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Craig A. James (07:23)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Shane Ambler (09:04)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Dave Cramer (15:29)
tweaking under repeatable load Ben (19:03)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Craig A. James (23:56)

2007-01-08

Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Adam Rich (02:26)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Tom Lane (02:47)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Joshua D. Drake (03:09)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Guy Rouillier (04:26)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Adam Rich (04:59)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Guy Rouillier (04:59)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Adam Rich (05:53)
Re: tweaking under repeatable load Dimitri Fontaine (09:18)
Re: table partioning performance Luke Lonergan (15:39)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Bruce Momjian (18:09)
Re: Slow Query on Postgres 8.2 Dave Dutcher (18:59)
Re: table partioning performance Steven Flatt (20:02)

2007-01-09

Re: table partioning performance Merlin Moncure (00:35)
Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Gregory S. Williamson (11:55)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Jim C. Nasby (12:33)
Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan db (12:35)
Re: table partioning performance Simon Riggs (12:48)
Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Nörder-Tuitje (12:50)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Jim C. Nasby (12:54)
Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Gregory S. Williamson (12:56)
Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Gregory S. Williamson (12:59)
Re: Worse perfomance on 8.2.0 than on 7.4.14 Rolf Østvik (14:15)
Running PG on cluster files systems Hannes Dorbath (14:15)
Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Dave Cramer (14:16)
Re: Running PG on cluster files systems Devrim GUNDUZ (14:16)
Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Tom Lane (15:13)
Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Plugge, Joe R. (15:36)
Re: Postgresql Configutation and overflow Jim C. Nasby (16:44)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Jeff Frost (17:10)
High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled vacuum Jeremy Haile (17:26)
Re: High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled vacuum Florian Weimer (18:02)
Re: High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled Jeremy Haile (20:14)
group by will not use an index? tsuraan (23:05)
Re: group by will not use an index? Adam Rich (23:32)
Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Gregory S. Williamson (23:40)
Re: group by will not use an index? Scott Marlowe (23:42)

2007-01-10

Re: group by will not use an index? Brian Herlihy (01:07)
Re: group by will not use an index? Steinar H. Gunderson (01:11)
Re: group by will not use an index? Andrew Lazarus (01:41)
Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Tom Lane (05:55)
Re: High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled vacuum Florian Weimer (09:33)
Re: Horribly slow query/ sequential scan Tom Lane (14:53)
Slow inner join, but left join is fast Jeremy Haile (16:17)
Re: group by will not use an index? tsuraan (17:14)
Re: Slow inner join, but left join is fast Tom Lane (17:15)
Re: Slow inner join, but left join is fast Jeremy Haile (18:20)
Re: Slow inner join, but left join is fast Tom Lane (18:38)
Re: Slow inner join, but left join is fast Jeremy Haile (18:38)
Re: Slow inner join, but left join is fast Jeremy Haile (18:44)
Re: Slow inner join, but left join is fast Tom Lane (19:22)
Re: Slow inner join, but left join is fast Jeremy Haile (19:26)
Re: performance implications of binary placement Jim C. Nasby (20:01)
Re: More 8.2 client issues (Was: [Slow dump?) Jim C. Nasby (20:07)
Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux Jim C. Nasby (20:15)
Re: PostgreSQL to host e-mail? Jim C. Nasby (20:18)
Re: Partitioning Jim C. Nasby (20:20)
Re: table partioning performance Jim C. Nasby (20:24)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Jim C. Nasby (20:26)
Re: Partitioning Jeremy Haile (20:28)
Re: Partitioning Erik Jones (20:30)
Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux Jeremy Haile (20:32)
Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS Jeff Frost (20:33)
Re: High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled vacuum Jim C. Nasby (20:35)
Re: Performance of PostgreSQL on Windows vs Linux Scott Marlowe (20:45)
Re: table partioning performance Steven Flatt (21:00)
Re: Partitioning Jim C. Nasby (21:09)
Re: Partitioning Jeremy Haile (21:15)
Re: High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled vacuum Jim C. Nasby (21:21)
Re: Partitioning Scott Marlowe (21:30)
Re: table partioning performance Steven Flatt (21:39)
Re: High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled Jeremy Haile (21:48)
Re: Partitioning Scott Marlowe (21:51)

2007-01-11

UNSUBSCRIBE andrew (00:49)
Re: table partioning performance Jim C. Nasby (01:23)
Re: High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled vacuum Jim C. Nasby (01:27)
Re: High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled vacuum Alvaro Herrera (03:10)
Re: High inserts, bulk deletes - autovacuum vs scheduled vacuum Jim C. Nasby (03:42)
Does it matters the column order in indexes and constraints creation? Arnau (10:56)
Re: Does it matters the column order in indexes and constraints Richard Huxton (11:27)
Re: table partioning performance Simon Riggs (12:15)
Re: Partitioning Bernd Helmle (12:51)
Re: Partitioning Mikael Carneholm (12:59)
Re: Partitioning Jeremy Haile (14:02)
Re: Partitioning Adam Rich (14:18)
Re: Partitioning Bernd Helmle (14:32)
unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Kim (17:20)
Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Russell Smith (18:07)
Improving SQL performance Carlos H. Reimer (18:17)
Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Tom Lane (18:17)
Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Tom Lane (18:20)
Re: Improving SQL performance Russell Smith (18:28)
Re: Improving SQL performance Tom Lane (18:31)
Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Kim (19:13)
Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Tom Lane (19:45)
Re: [HACKERS] unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Alvaro Herrera (19:49)
Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Simon Riggs (20:40)
Re: [HACKERS] table partioning performance Jim C. Nasby (21:01)
Re: [HACKERS] unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Tom Lane (21:11)
RES: Improving SQL performance Carlos H. Reimer (21:14)
Re: [HACKERS] unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Jim C. Nasby (21:16)
Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Kim (21:52)
Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Tom Lane (22:26)
Re: [HACKERS] unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Tom Lane (23:10)
Re: unusual performance for vac following 8.2 upgrade Kim (23:12)
Re: [HACKERS] unusual performance for vac following 8.2upgrade Simon Riggs (23:14)
Re: RES: Improving SQL performance Cesar Suga (23:47)

2007-01-12

Re: [HACKERS] unusual performance for vac following 8.2upgrade Alvaro Herrera (01:09)
Re: [HACKERS] unusual performance for vac following 8.2upgrade Tom Lane (02:51)
Planner statistics, correlations Tobias Brox (08:16)
Re: Planner statistics, correlations Peter Childs (08:56)
Re: Planner statistics, correlations Tobias Brox (09:05)
Re: [HACKERS] unusual performance for vac following 8.2upgrade Richard Huxton (09:06)

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group