Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open source database.

pgsql-performance - May 2006

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

May 1, 2006

Re: query performance question Dave Dutcher (00:36)
Super-smack? Scott Sipe (08:05)
Re: Easy question mlartz@gmail.com (11:35)
Re: Super-smack? Steinar H. Gunderson (11:54)
Re: Super-smack? Steve Woodcock (13:06)
Re: Super-smack? Tom Lane (15:15)
Re: Worsening performance with 7.4 on flash-based system Scott Marlowe (15:55)
Re: Super-smack? Mikael Carneholm (17:00)
Cluster vs. non-cluster query planning Nolan Cafferky (17:27)
Re: Super-smack? Tom Lane (17:43)
Re: hardare config question Erik Myllymaki (17:58)
Re: hardare config question Mark Lewis (18:15)
Re: hardare config question Tom Arthurs (18:22)
Re: hardare config question Vivek Khera (18:29)
Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay. Chris Mckenzie (18:40)
Re: hardare config question Erik Myllymaki (18:43)
Re: hardare config question Luke Lonergan (18:50)
Re: hardare config question Scott Marlowe (18:51)
Re: hardare config question Erik Myllymaki (19:40)
Re: Cluster vs. non-cluster query planning Nolan Cafferky (19:48)
Re: Cluster vs. non-cluster query planning Tom Lane (20:30)
Re: Cluster vs. non-cluster query planning Nolan Cafferky (21:08)
Re: Hardware: HP StorageWorks MSA 1500 Mikael Carneholm (21:33)
Re: Cluster vs. non-cluster query planning Tom Lane (23:35)

May 2, 2006

Re: Cluster vs. non-cluster query planning Nolan Cafferky (00:01)
Lot'sa joins - performance tip-up, please? Mario Splivalo (01:27)
Why is plan (and performance) different on partitioned table? Mark Liberman (01:37)
Re: Why is plan (and performance) different on partitioned table? Tom Lane (02:59)
Re: Why is plan (and performance) different on partitioned table? Tom Lane (04:44)
Re: Running on an NFS Mounted Directory Fortuitous Technologies (14:58)
Re: Easy question Jim C. Nasby (17:14)
Re: Why so slow? Markus Schaber (17:16)
Re: Slow restoration question Jim C. Nasby (17:16)
postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios Tony Wasson (18:26)
Re: Slow restoration question Brendan Duddridge (18:40)
Re: Slow restoration question Mark Lewis (18:49)
Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios Vivek Khera (18:50)
Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios Alvaro Herrera (19:03)
Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios Tony Wasson (19:06)
Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios Alvaro Herrera (19:07)
Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios Vivek Khera (19:12)
Re: Why is plan (and performance) different on partitioned table? Mark Liberman (19:28)
Re: Slow restoration question Will Reese (19:34)
Re: Why so slow? Jim C. Nasby (20:13)
Re: Why so slow? Jim C. Nasby (20:17)
Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios Bruno Wolff III (20:19)
Re: Why is plan (and performance) different on partitioned table? Tom Lane (20:27)
Re: Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core Jim C. Nasby (20:28)
Re: Super-smack? Jim C. Nasby (20:36)
Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios Tony Wasson (20:50)
Re: Cluster vs. non-cluster query planning Jim C. Nasby (21:29)
Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay. Jim C. Nasby (21:38)
Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios Jim C. Nasby (21:42)
Re: postgresql transaction id monitoring with nagios Jim C. Nasby (21:46)
Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay. Chris Mckenzie (21:47)
Re: Slow restoration question Jim C. Nasby (21:53)
Re: Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core Jan de Visser (22:49)
Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay. Jim C. Nasby (22:54)
Nested loop join and date range query Ian Burrell (22:55)
Re: Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core Jim C. Nasby (22:56)
Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay. Steinar H. Gunderson (23:00)
Killing long-running queries Dan Harris (23:19)
Re: Why so slow? Bill Moran (23:28)
Re: Killing long-running queries Tom Lane (23:30)
Re: Killing long-running queries Tony Wasson (23:43)
Re: PL/pgSQL Loop Vs. Batch Update David Wheeler (23:49)
Re: PL/pgSQL Loop Vs. Batch Update David Wheeler (23:52)
Re: Killing long-running queries Dan Harris (23:53)

May 3, 2006

Re: Killing long-running queries Devrim GUNDUZ (00:01)
Re: PL/pgSQL Loop Vs. Batch Update David Wheeler (01:16)
Re: Killing long-running queries Will Reese (02:09)
Re: Slow restoration question Brendan Duddridge (02:09)
Re: Nested loop join and date range query Tom Lane (03:03)
Re: Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core Gregory Stewart (03:58)
Re: Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core Gregory Stewart (04:27)
Re: Easy question Chris (06:21)
Re: Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core Magnus Hagander (07:29)
Re: Why so slow? Michael Stone (11:22)
Re: Slow restoration question Michael Stone (12:18)
Re: Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core Jan de Visser (12:30)
Re: Slow restoration question Jeff Trout (13:19)
Re: Slow restoration question Vivek Khera (14:16)
Re: Slow restoration question Jeff Trout (14:46)
Re: Lot'sa joins - performance tip-up, please? Dave Dutcher (15:20)
Re: Slow restoration question Michael Stone (15:59)
Re: Slow restoration question Scott Marlowe (16:07)
Re: Slow restoration question Michael Stone (17:06)
Re: Nested loop join and date range query Ian Burrell (17:54)
Re: Lot'sa joins - performance tip-up, please? Tom Lane (17:58)
Re: Slow restoration question Jim C. Nasby (18:08)
Re: Slow restoration question Michael Stone (19:26)
Re: Slow restoration question Scott Marlowe (19:40)
Re: Slow restoration question Michael Stone (20:53)
Re: Slow restoration question Scott Marlowe (21:30)
Re: Slow restoration question Michael Stone (22:00)

May 4, 2006

Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay. Andrew Sullivan (12:27)
Re: Lot'sa joins - performance tip-up, please? Mario Splivalo (14:15)
Re: Lot'sa joins - performance tip-up, please? Mario Splivalo (14:45)
Re: Postgres 7.4 and vacuum_cost_delay. Chris Mckenzie (14:49)
Re: Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core Jim C. Nasby (17:47)
Re: Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core Jim C. Nasby (17:49)
Re: Why so slow? Jim C. Nasby (17:53)
Re: Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core Gregory Stewart (20:24)

May 5, 2006

Re: Performance Issues on Opteron Dual Core Magnus Hagander (07:51)
Re: Super-smack? Bruce Momjian (09:50)
Memory and/or cache issues? mcelroy, tim (11:49)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Tom Lane (13:25)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? mcelroy, tim (13:26)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Alvaro Herrera (13:31)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Tom Lane (13:43)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? mcelroy, tim (13:57)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Michael Stone (14:23)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? mcelroy, tim (14:27)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Dave Dutcher (14:31)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? mcelroy, tim (14:36)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Michael Stone (14:40)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? mcelroy, tim (14:45)
slow variable against int?? Witold Strzelczyk (14:46)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? mcelroy, tim (14:48)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Craig A. James (14:51)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Michael Stone (14:53)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Gábriel Ákos (16:33)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Michael Stone (17:09)
Dynamically loaded C function performance Adam Palmblad (22:47)

May 6, 2006

Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Jim C. Nasby (00:31)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Jim C. Nasby (00:33)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Jim C. Nasby (00:35)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? David Boreham (04:33)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? mcelroy, tim (14:53)

May 7, 2006

pg_dump index creation order Ed L. (01:15)
Re: pg_dump index creation order Ed L. (03:09)
Re: pg_dump index creation order Jim C. Nasby (17:08)

May 8, 2006

extremely slow when execute select/delete for certain tables only... kah_hang_ang (08:47)
Re: extremely slow when execute select/delete for certain Markus Schaber (09:21)
Query runs 38 seconds for small database! Andrus (10:59)
Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database! Tom Lane (14:46)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Vivek Khera (15:06)
Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database! Andrus (16:15)
Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database! Tom Lane (16:27)
Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database! Andrus (17:03)
Re: extremely slow when execute select/delete for certain Jim C. Nasby (17:27)
Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database! Jim C. Nasby (17:28)
performance question (something to do w/ parameterized stmts?, wrong index types?) Jeffrey Tenny (17:29)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Jim C. Nasby (17:30)
Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database! Andrus (17:36)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ parameterized stmts?, wrong index types?) Jim C. Nasby (17:38)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ Mark Lewis (17:42)
Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database! Jim C. Nasby (17:46)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ Jim C. Nasby (17:50)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ Tom Lane (17:59)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ Kenneth Marshall (18:01)
Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database! Andrus (18:10)
Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database! Jan de Visser (19:19)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Vivek Khera (19:38)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ parameterized Jeffrey Tenny (19:43)
Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database! Tom Lane (19:48)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ parameterized Jeffrey Tenny (19:51)
Re: Query runs 38 seconds for small database! Alvaro Herrera (20:02)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ parameterized Tom Lane (20:08)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ parameterized Jeffrey Tenny (20:33)
[No subject] Adam Palmblad (20:38)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ parameterized Tom Lane (20:49)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? Michael Stone (21:17)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ parameterized Jeffrey Tenny (22:11)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ parameterized Jeffrey Tenny (22:15)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ parameterized Tom Lane (23:06)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ parameterized Jeffrey Tenny (23:35)
Re: performance question (something to do w/ parameterized Tom Lane (23:37)

May 9, 2006

Re: performance question (something to do w/ parameterized Klint Gore (00:10)
Assistance with optimizing query - same SQL, different category_id = Seq Scan Brendan Duddridge (01:29)
Re: extremely slow when execute select/delete for certain tables kah_hang_ang (01:39)
Re: Takes too long to fetch the data from database soni de (03:54)
Re: Takes too long to fetch the data from database Bruno Wolff III (07:38)
Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC (08:38)
Re: Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Christian Kratzer (09:01)
Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid Hannes Dorbath (09:16)
Re: Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC (09:33)
Re: Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Christian Kratzer (09:41)
VACUUM killing my CPU blender (09:45)
Re: Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid Jean-Yves F. Barbier (10:10)
Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC (10:10)
PostgreSQL VACCUM killing CPU blender (10:19)
Re: Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid Hannes Dorbath (10:24)
Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Martijn van Oosterhout (10:36)
Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Csaba Nagy (10:52)
Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC (11:29)
Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid Grega Bremec (11:37)
Re: Memory and/or cache issues? mcelroy, tim (12:45)
Re: Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Tom Lane (13:31)
Re: Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid Steve Atkins (14:41)
Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Greg Stark (15:00)
Re: Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid Bruno Wolff III (15:18)
Re: [PERFORM] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid Scott Marlowe (15:49)
Re: Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid Joshua D. Drake (15:51)
Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Mitchell Skinner (15:58)
Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC (16:29)
Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC (16:38)
Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal Dawid Kuroczko (16:43)
Re: [HACKERS] Big IN() clauses etc : feature proposal PFC (16:49)
Re: Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid Steve Atkins (17:52)

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group