Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open source database.

pgsql-performance - August 2005

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

2005-08-01

Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Michael Parker (04:04)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Tom Lane (04:42)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Tom Lane (04:53)
Re: [PATCHES] COPY FROM performance improvements Tom Lane (16:32)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Matthew Schumacher (17:08)
Re: [PATCHES] COPY FROM performance improvements Alon Goldshuv (19:48)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Matthew Schumacher (20:04)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 PFC (21:18)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Matthew Schumacher (21:28)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Jim C. Nasby (21:49)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Michael Parker (22:09)
Planner incorrectly choosing seq scan over index scan Meetesh Karia (22:19)
Re: Planner incorrectly choosing seq scan over index scan Tobias Brox (22:37)
Re: Planner incorrectly choosing seq scan over index scan John Arbash Meinel (23:16)
Re: Planner incorrectly choosing seq scan over index scan Meetesh Karia (23:30)
Re: [PERFORM] COPY FROM performance improvements Tom Lane (23:51)
Re: Planner incorrectly choosing seq scan over index scan Meetesh Karia (23:56)

2005-08-02

Re: Planner incorrectly choosing seq scan over index scan Tom Lane (00:15)
Re: Planner incorrectly choosing seq scan over index scan Meetesh Karia (07:05)
Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Alon Goldshuv (14:59)
Re: [PERFORM] COPY FROM performance improvements Alon Goldshuv (15:03)
"nice"/low priority Query Tobias Brox (16:04)
Re: "nice"/low priority Query Tom Lane (16:19)
Re: "nice"/low priority Query Richard Huxton (16:54)
Re: "nice"/low priority Query Jim C. Nasby (17:25)
pg_dump for table with bytea takes a long time Sailer, Denis (YBUSA-CDR) (18:57)
Re: "nice"/low priority Query Tobias Brox (19:59)

2005-08-03

Re: "nice"/low priority Query Richard Huxton (08:53)
Re: Planner incorrectly choosing seq scan over index scan Meetesh Karia (12:48)
Is There A Windows Version of Performance Tuning Documents? Lane Van Ingen (13:15)
Re: Is There A Windows Version of Performance Tuning Documents? John A Meinel (15:07)

2005-08-04

Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Matthew Schumacher (08:13)
Indexed views. prasanna s (08:24)
Re: Indexed views. Christopher Kings-Lynne (08:37)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 PFC (08:45)
Re: Indexed views. Laszlo Hornyak (08:52)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 John A Meinel (14:10)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Tom Lane (14:37)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 John A Meinel (15:08)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Matthew Schumacher (16:13)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Tom Lane (16:16)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Matthew Schumacher (16:17)
Re: "nice"/low priority Query Neil Conway (17:32)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Matthew Schumacher (17:35)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 John A Meinel (19:36)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 Matthew Schumacher (22:37)
Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 John A Meinel (22:42)

2005-08-05

Performance problems on 4-way AMD Opteron 875 (dual core) Dirk Lutzebäck (11:11)
Re: Performance problems on 4-way AMD Opteron 875 (dual core) Michael Stone (12:27)
Re: Performance problems on 4-way AMD Opteron 875 (dual Dirk Lutzebäck (12:56)
Re: Performance problems on 4-way AMD Opteron 875 (dual core) Tom Lane (13:53)
Why hash join instead of nested loop? Rhett Garber (18:35)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Havasvölgyi Ottó (22:13)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Rhett Garber (23:16)

2005-08-06

Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Tom Lane (05:03)
Slow update statement Patrick Hatcher (13:16)
Re: Slow update statement John A Meinel (13:34)
Re: Slow update statement Tom Lane (14:12)
Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Tom Lane (21:04)

2005-08-07

Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Luke Lonergan (02:33)
Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Luke Lonergan (02:54)
Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Luke Lonergan (03:25)
Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Tom Lane (04:08)
Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Luke Lonergan (05:21)

2005-08-08

Re: Slow update statement Patrick Hatcher (02:00)
Re: Slow update statement Patrick Hatcher (02:09)
Re: Slow update statement Tom Lane (03:48)
Re: Slow update statement Patrick Hatcher (04:35)
Re: Finding bottleneck Kari Lavikka (12:03)
Re: Finding bottleneck Tom Lane (14:39)
Re: Slow update statement Tom Lane (15:18)
Re: Finding bottleneck Merlin Moncure (15:24)
Re: Finding bottleneck Tom Lane (15:37)
Re: Finding bottleneck Kari Lavikka (16:19)
Re: Finding bottleneck Tom Lane (16:56)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Rhett Garber (17:00)
Re: Finding bottleneck Kari Lavikka (17:54)
Re: Finding bottleneck Tom Lane (19:27)

2005-08-09

Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Tom Lane (00:58)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Steinar H. Gunderson (01:08)
Re: QRY seems not using indexes Qingqing Zhou (04:30)
Re: QRY seems not using indexes Mark Kirkwood (05:05)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Michael Fuhr (05:11)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Ian Westmacott (12:15)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Tom Lane (14:33)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Ian Westmacott (14:43)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Rhett Garber (16:51)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Tom Lane (17:12)
Table locking problems? Dan Harris (18:04)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Rhett Garber (18:10)
Re: Table locking problems? Joshua D. Drake (18:33)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Tom Lane (18:37)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Rhett Garber (18:51)
Re: Table locking problems? Michael Fuhr (18:52)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Tom Lane (19:00)
Re: Table locking problems? Tom Lane (19:08)
Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop? Rhett Garber (19:11)
Re: Table locking problems? Dan Harris (20:42)
Re: Table locking problems? Dan Harris (20:51)
Re: Table locking problems? John A Meinel (21:51)
Re: Table locking problems? Dan Harris (22:05)
Re: Table locking problems? John A Meinel (22:30)

2005-08-10

Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Alon Goldshuv (00:41)
Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Andrew Dunstan (01:01)
Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Luke Lonergan (04:39)
Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Luke Lonergan (04:48)
Re: Table locking problems? Steve Poe (06:49)
Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Simon Riggs (08:15)
Re: COPY FROM performance improvements Tom Lane (15:29)
partial index regarded more expensive Tobias Brox (17:52)
Re: partial index regarded more expensive PFC (18:15)
Re: partial index regarded more expensive Tobias Brox (18:31)
Re: Planner doesn't look at LIMIT? Ian Westmacott (21:03)
Re: Planner doesn't look at LIMIT? Tom Lane (22:55)
Speedier count(*) Dan Harris (23:37)

2005-08-11

Re: Speedier count(*) Joshua D. Drake (00:23)
Re: Speedier count(*) Michael Fuhr (00:36)
Re: Speedier count(*) John A Meinel (01:07)
Re: partial index regarded more expensive Tom Lane (03:14)
it is always delete temp table will slow down the postmaster? Chun Yit(Chronos) (03:37)
Re: Speedier count(*) Gavin Sherry (03:52)
Re: Speedier count(*) Mark Cotner (04:40)
Re: it is always delete temp table will slow down the postmaster? Qingqing Zhou (06:37)
Re: it is always delete temp table will slow down the postmaster? Chun Yit(Chronos) (07:03)
Re: Speedier count(*) Tino Wildenhain (07:24)
Re: Speedier count(*) Gavin Sherry (10:36)
Re: Speedier count(*) Tino Wildenhain (10:52)
Why is not using the index Luis Cornide Arce (11:33)
Re: Speedier count(*) PFC (12:08)
PG8 Tuning Paul Johnson (12:23)
Re: Speedier count(*) Tino Wildenhain (12:34)
Re: Why is not using the index Richard Huxton (12:49)
Re: PG8 Tuning Richard Huxton (12:55)
Performance pb vs SQLServer. Stéphane COEZ (13:19)
Re: Planner doesn't look at LIMIT? Ian Westmacott (13:26)
Re: Why is not using the index Luis Cornide Arce (13:59)
Re: PG8 Tuning Michael Stone (14:07)
Re: [Fwd: PG8 Tuning] Jignesh Shah (14:30)
BG writer question? Alan Stange (15:25)
Re: Speedier count(*) Dan Harris (15:33)
Re: BG writer question? Alvaro Herrera (16:43)
Re: [SPAM?] Re: PG8 Tuning Jeffrey W. Baker (16:58)
Re: PG8 Tuning Mark Lewis (17:18)
Re: [SPAM?] Re: PG8 Tuning Tom Arthurs (18:00)
Odd Locking Problem John A Meinel (20:36)
Re: PG8 Tuning Merlin Moncure (20:38)
Re: Odd Locking Problem Alvaro Herrera (21:08)
Re: Odd Locking Problem John A Meinel (21:11)
Mostly read performance Jeffrey Tenny (22:21)
Re: Mostly read performance John A Meinel (22:38)
Re: Mostly read performance Jeffrey Tenny (23:13)
Re: Odd Locking Problem John A Meinel (23:30)
Re: PG8 Tuning Michael Stone (23:54)

2005-08-12

Re: Mostly read performance Michael Stone (00:30)
How many views is ok? Petr Kavan (06:53)
Re: Mostly read performance Greg Stark (07:32)
[SPAM?] Re: PG8 Tuning Steve Poe (08:47)
Re: [SPAM?] Re: PG8 Tuning Jeff Trout (12:18)
Re: Mostly read performance (2 replies) Jeffrey Tenny (22:37)

2005-08-15

Re: How many views is ok? John Arbash Meinel (00:22)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. John Arbash Meinel (00:27)
Re: How many views is ok? Tom Lane (00:38)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. Steinar H. Gunderson (01:01)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. Steinar H. Gunderson (01:04)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. John Arbash Meinel (01:05)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. Tom Lane (01:18)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. Steinar H. Gunderson (01:37)
Re: How many views is ok? Petr Kavan (05:23)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. dario_d_s (05:51)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. Magnus Hagander (08:18)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. Magnus Hagander (08:25)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. Stéphane COEZ (09:05)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. Stéphane COEZ (09:08)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. Stéphane COEZ (09:08)
Re: Odd Locking Problem Manfred Koizar (15:19)
Re: Performance pb vs SQLServer. Alvaro Herrera (16:18)
I'm configuraing a new system (Bigish) and need some advice. Jeremiah Jahn (16:24)
Re: I'm configuraing a new system (Bigish) and need some advice. Jeremiah Jahn (16:29)
Re: I'm configuraing a new system (Bigish) and need some advice. Jeremiah Jahn (16:29)
choosing RAID level for xlogs Anjan Dave (20:35)

2005-08-16

database encoding with index search problem wisan watcharinporn (07:01)
Looking for a large database for testing Sebastian Hennebrueder (07:29)
Re: Looking for a large database for testing Tino Wildenhain (08:07)
Re: Looking for a large database for testing Sebastian Hennebrueder (08:23)
Re: database encoding with index search problem Richard Huxton (08:23)
Re: Looking for a large database for testing Mark Rae (08:39)
Re: Looking for a large database for testing Oleg Bartunov (09:38)
Need for speed Ulrich Wisser (15:39)
Re. : Need for speed bsimon (16:02)
Re: Need for speed Richard Huxton (16:03)
Re: Need for speed John A Meinel (16:12)
Re: [SPAM?] Re: PG8 Tuning Josh Berkus (16:12)
Re: [SPAM?] Re: PG8 Tuning Alvaro Herrera (16:25)
Re: [SPAM?] Re: PG8 Tuning Joshua D. Drake (16:31)
Re: PG8 Tuning John A Meinel (16:33)
Re: Need for speed Jeffrey W. Baker (16:43)
Re: Need for speed Roger Hand (17:01)
Re: [SPAM?] Re: PG8 Tuning Michael Stone (17:30)
Query plan looks OK, but slow I/O - settings advice? Roger Hand (17:46)
Re: Need for speed Alex Turner (17:59)

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group