Skip site navigation
(1)
Skip section navigation
(2)
Search
Peripheral Links
Text Size:
Normal
/
Large
Donate
Contact
Home
About
Download
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Your account
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
User lists
Developer lists
Regional lists
Associations
User groups
Project lists
Inactive lists
pgsql-benchmarks
pgsql-chat
pgsql-cygwin
pgsql-hackers-pitr
pgsql-hackers-win32
pgsql-patches
pgsql-ports
pgsql-testers
IRC
Featured Users
International Sites
Propaganda
Resources
Weekly News
pgsql-patches - April 2003
Search archives
(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search
Prev
|
Next
Jump to day:
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
29
30
2003-04-01
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Joe Conway (01:59)
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Joe Conway (23:42)
2003-04-02
Win32 path patch
Bruce Momjian (20:15)
2003-04-03
system() patch for Win32
Bruce Momjian (05:33)
Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (06:14)
Re: system() patch for Win32
Tom Lane (14:43)
Re: Win32 defines
Tom Lane (14:47)
Re: Win32 path patch
Peter Eisentraut (15:07)
Re: Win32 defines
Peter Eisentraut (15:08)
pglog-rotator
Andrew Sullivan (21:10)
2003-04-04
pglog-rotator
Andrew Sullivan (02:10)
Re: pglog-rotator
Alvaro Herrera (02:57)
Re: Win32 path patch
Bruce Momjian (20:13)
Re: system() patch for Win32
Bruce Momjian (20:39)
Re: Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (20:48)
2003-04-05
Re: Win32 defines
Neil Conway (05:29)
Re: Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (17:38)
Re: Win32 defines
Alvaro Herrera (17:49)
Re: Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (17:53)
Re: Win32 defines
Rod Taylor (19:40)
Re: Win32 defines
Peter Eisentraut (23:59)
2003-04-07
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Joe Conway (02:12)
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Tom Lane (03:45)
2003-04-08
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Peter Eisentraut (12:19)
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Hannu Krosing (13:55)
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Tom Lane (14:01)
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Joe Conway (16:19)
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Tom Lane (16:37)
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Joe Conway (16:55)
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Hannu Krosing (19:47)
2003-04-09
Minor doc patch for charset
Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:30)
Modern C++ Interface
Peter Jones (18:15)
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Tom Lane (19:00)
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Joe Conway (22:22)
Re: array support patch phase 1 patch
Tom Lane (22:44)
FK on update no action patch
Stephan Szabo (23:48)
2003-04-10
Re: ECPG thread-safety
Michael Meskes (17:20)
2003-04-11
IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II)
Michael Graff (10:29)
Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II)
Tom Lane (14:14)
Re: Modern C++ Interface
Patrick Welche (17:27)
Re: Modern C++ Interface
Peter Jones (17:52)
Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II)
Peter Eisentraut (18:41)
2003-04-12
Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II)
Michael Graff (10:20)
Reserved Key Words, Using "path" as a table name
Tom (19:09)
patch for cursor based querys in JDBC
Nic Ferrier (23:33)
2003-04-13
Re: patch for cursor based querys in JDBC
Barry Lind (04:13)
Resend of encoding docs patch
Christopher Kings-Lynne (10:32)
Re: patch for cursor based querys in JDBC
Nic Ferrier (11:36)
Re: Reserved Key Words, Using "path" as a table name
Tom Lane (22:56)
Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II)
Peter Eisentraut (23:39)
2003-04-14
Re: Modern C++ Interface
Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:50)
Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II)
Tom Lane (02:52)
Are we losing momentum?
Bruce Momjian (22:37)
refcursor handling patch
Nic Ferrier (22:51)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Dennis Gearon (23:41)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Tom Lane (23:54)
2003-04-15
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Gavin Sherry (00:18)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Kevin Brown (00:30)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Gavin Sherry (00:38)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Larry Rosenman (01:37)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Brent Verner (01:52)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:15)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
cbbrowne (02:24)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Curt Sampson (02:36)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Bruce Momjian (02:48)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:50)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Mike Mascari (02:51)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Christopher Browne (03:12)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Sailesh Krishnamurthy (03:13)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Jeff Hoffmann (03:54)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Ron Mayer (04:38)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Shridhar Daithankar (06:08)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Tony Grant (06:12)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Tom Lane (06:40)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Wayne Armstrong (08:30)
Re: [GENERAL] Are we losing momentum?
Shridhar Daithankar (08:42)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Kevin Brown (09:10)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Curt Sampson (09:28)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Thierry Missimilly (09:41)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Wayne Armstrong (10:10)
the build
Nic Ferrier (10:19)
Re: the build
Paul Sorenson (10:51)
Re: the build
Nic Ferrier (11:33)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
mlw (11:51)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
mlw (12:07)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Tatsuo Ishii (12:09)
PostgreSQL vs. MySQL in Japan (was: Are we losing momentum?)
Ned Lilly (12:38)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Ericson Smith (13:12)
Re: [GENERAL] Are we losing momentum?
Shridhar Daithankar (13:18)
Re: Minor doc patch for charset
Peter Eisentraut (13:28)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Tom Lane (14:03)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Robert Treat (14:19)
Re: the build
Barry Lind (15:52)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
scott.marlowe (16:18)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Kurt Roeckx (16:36)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Lamar Owen (16:43)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Bruce Momjian (16:50)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Bruce Momjian (16:52)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Bruce Momjian (16:55)
Re: the build
Nic Ferrier (17:03)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
John Liu (17:21)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Steve Wampler (17:23)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
ow (17:30)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Sean Chittenden (18:29)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Robert Treat (18:50)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Mike Benoit (18:56)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Tom Lane (19:17)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
ow (19:35)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Neil Conway (20:27)
Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II)
Bruce Momjian (21:28)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Michael Paesold (21:51)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
ow (21:58)
Re: the build
Oliver Jowett (22:33)
Re: the build
Nic Ferrier (22:43)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Tom Lane (23:28)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
ow (23:56)
2003-04-16
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Rob Butler (00:08)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
cbbrowne (00:28)
Re: Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (04:04)
Re: the build
Barry Lind (04:43)
Re: [PATCHES] the build
Barry Lind (04:58)
Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL in Japan
Tatsuo Ishii (05:43)
Re: Win32 defines
Tom Lane (06:03)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Shridhar Daithankar (07:20)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Shridhar Daithankar (07:55)
Re: the build
Nic Ferrier (08:52)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
ow (12:20)
Re: [PATCHES] the build
Nic Ferrier (12:41)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
greg (13:51)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Shridhar Daithankar (14:16)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Hannu Krosing (14:17)
Re: Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (14:51)
Re: Win32 defines
Tom Lane (15:26)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Sean Chittenden (15:45)
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Tom Lane (15:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Sean Chittenden (16:17)
Re: [PATCHES] the build
Barry Lind (16:25)
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Tom Lane (16:26)
Re: [PATCHES] the build
Peter Eisentraut (17:47)
Re: Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (17:54)
Re: Win32 defines
Tom Lane (18:00)
Re: [PATCHES] the build
Nic Ferrier (18:10)
Re: [PATCHES] the build
Nic Ferrier (18:14)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Ron Mayer (22:38)
2003-04-17
Re: [PATCHES] the build
Barry Lind (00:30)
Re: Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (02:51)
Re: Win32 defines
Tom Lane (03:04)
Re: Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (03:13)
Re: Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (03:20)
Re: [PATCHES] the build
Nic Ferrier (09:21)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Nigel J. Andrews (11:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Peter Eisentraut (12:45)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Ian Barwick (12:50)
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Tom Lane (14:05)
Re: Win32 defines
Peter Eisentraut (17:40)
Re: Win32 defines
Peter Eisentraut (17:40)
Re: [PATCHES] the build
Peter Eisentraut (17:41)
Re: Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (18:42)
Re: Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (18:44)
Re: [PATCHES] the build
Nic Ferrier (18:51)
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Sean Chittenden (19:48)
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Tom Lane (19:52)
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Sean Chittenden (21:09)
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Rod Taylor (21:25)
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Tom Lane (21:40)
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Sean Chittenden (21:55)
Nested transactions, 1st try
Alvaro Herrera (22:57)
2003-04-18
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Peter Eisentraut (00:21)
Re: Win32 defines
Bruce Momjian (01:04)
Win32 patch for COPY
Bruce Momjian (03:17)
Re: Nested transactions, 1st try
Manfred Koizar (09:55)
Re: Win32 defines
Peter Eisentraut (09:59)
Re: Win32 patch for COPY
Bruce Momjian (23:45)
2003-04-19
Slightly improved SSL bits...
Sean Chittenden (19:08)
build patch
Nic Ferrier (21:13)
2003-04-20
rename/unlink handling for Win32
Bruce Momjian (02:39)
Re: rename/unlink handling for Win32
Bruce Momjian (02:47)
Re: rename/unlink handling for Win32
Peter Eisentraut (16:16)
2003-04-21
Re: [HACKERS] rename/unlink handling for Win32
Bruce Momjian (14:35)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
scott.marlowe (15:30)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Shridhar Daithankar (15:44)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Steve Wampler (15:45)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Neil Conway (17:06)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
scott.marlowe (20:26)
Re: [HACKERS] Are we losing momentum?
Sean Chittenden (21:17)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Neil Conway (21:47)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Sander Steffann (22:48)
2003-04-22
Re: Nested transactions, 1st try
Alvaro Herrera (03:42)
Re: ECPG CVS version problems
Philip Yarra (03:45)
Re: ECPG CVS version problems
Philip Yarra (04:02)
Re: ECPG thread-safety
Philip Yarra (04:05)
holdable cursor mop-up
Neil Conway (05:38)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Jim C. Nasby (07:07)
Re: Are we losing momentum?
Tilo Schwarz (15:14)
log_min_duration_statement feature
Christopher Kings-Lynne (15:37)
Re: log_min_duration_statement feature
Tom Lane (15:52)
Re: IPv6 address parsing for inet/cidr types (take II)
Michael Graff (23:34)
2003-04-23
Re: log_min_duration_statement feature
Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:46)
Re: log_min_duration_statement feature
Bruce Momjian (02:31)
log_min_duration_statement #2
Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:38)
Prev
|
Next
Jump to day:
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
29
30
Privacy Policy
|
About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group