Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open source database.

pgsql-hackers since 2012-05-03 00:00

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

2012-05-03

Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane (00:19)
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Robert Haas (00:41)
Re: Temporary tables under hot standby Josh Berkus (00:57)
Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap Josh Berkus (01:01)
Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() Noah Misch (01:06)
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Tom Lane (03:42)
Re: [HACKERS] Features of Postgresql and Postgres-xc with MySQL Vivek Singh Raghuwanshi (04:00)
Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() Daniel Farina (04:01)
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Robert Haas (04:11)
Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() Tom Lane (04:16)
Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby) Jim Nasby (04:24)
Re: Future In-Core Replication Jim Nasby (05:58)
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Heikki Linnakangas (06:14)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Simon Riggs (08:43)
Re: PL/Python result set slicing broken in Python 3 Jan Urbański (09:04)
Re: Temporary tables under hot standby Simon Riggs (09:11)
Re: Modeling consumed shmem sizes, and some thorns Simon Riggs (09:23)
Re: Modeling consumed shmem sizes, and some thorns Daniel Farina (09:33)
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Magnus Hagander (09:56)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Hannu Krosing (10:19)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Pavel Stehule (12:13)
"unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander (12:26)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Simon Riggs (12:31)
ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Magnus Hagander (12:31)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander (12:33)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Vik Reykja (12:34)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander (12:36)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Kevin Grittner (12:46)
Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Simon Riggs (12:48)
Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() Robert Haas (12:54)
Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Magnus Hagander (13:01)
outdated comment in heapam.c Andres Freund (13:08)
Re: Temporary tables under hot standby Merlin Moncure (13:19)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Merlin Moncure (13:31)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Pavel Stehule (13:43)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Andrew Dunstan (14:01)
Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Tom Lane (14:13)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane (14:17)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Merlin Moncure (14:18)
Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Magnus Hagander (14:22)
Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Tom Lane (14:26)
Re: ALTER DATABASE and datallowconn Magnus Hagander (14:28)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Tom Lane (14:33)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Pavel Stehule (14:42)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Andrew Dunstan (14:44)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander (14:48)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander (14:49)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Tom Lane (14:50)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane (14:53)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Merlin Moncure (14:56)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander (14:58)
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian (14:59)
Re: pgsql: Remove dead ports Bruce Momjian (15:01)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Pavel Stehule (15:05)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane (15:06)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Tom Lane (15:12)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Alvaro Herrera (15:20)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Robert Haas (15:33)
Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage() Tom Lane (15:34)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane (15:39)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Robert Haas (15:46)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Kevin Grittner (15:46)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane (16:04)
Re: How hard would it be to support LIKE in return declaration of generic record function calls ? Merlin Moncure (16:04)
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Eisentraut (16:11)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Simon Riggs (16:12)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Merlin Moncure (16:12)
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian (16:21)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane (16:25)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane (16:30)
CLOG extension Robert Haas (16:37)
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Geoghegan (16:39)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Robert Haas (16:41)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane (16:46)
Re: outdated comment in heapam.c Heikki Linnakangas (16:46)
Re: Future In-Core Replication Josh Berkus (16:56)
Re: CLOG extension Tom Lane (16:59)
Re: Future In-Core Replication Josh Berkus (17:03)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander (17:04)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane (17:09)
Re: extending relations more efficiently Stephen Frost (17:11)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Josh Berkus (17:14)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Kevin Grittner (17:16)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane (17:20)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander (17:21)
Re: Future In-Core Replication Simon Riggs (17:22)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Robert Haas (17:22)
Re: CLOG extension Simon Riggs (17:27)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane (17:28)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander (17:36)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Kevin Grittner (17:44)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane (17:48)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Andres Freund (18:19)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane (18:25)
Re: CLOG extension Robert Haas (18:50)
Re: patch submission: truncate trailing nulls from heap rows to reduce the size of the null bitmap Josh Berkus (18:52)
Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby) Josh Berkus (19:05)
Re: Temporary tables under hot standby Josh Berkus (19:06)
Re: CLOG extension Robert Haas (19:18)
Re: CLOG extension Simon Riggs (19:20)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander (19:26)
Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby) Kevin Grittner (19:31)
Re: Uppercase tab completion keywords in psql? Bruce Momjian (19:47)
Re: Have we out-grown Flex? james (19:51)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane (19:52)
Re: Have we out-grown Flex? james (19:53)
Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby) Josh Berkus (19:54)
Re: Have we out-grown Flex? Daniel Farina (19:56)
Re: Have we out-grown Flex? james (20:03)
Re: CLOG extension Robert Haas (20:56)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Robert Haas (21:01)
Re: CLOG extension Daniel Farina (21:04)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane (21:08)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane (21:18)
Re: CLOG extension Alvaro Herrera (21:26)
Re: CLOG extension Daniel Farina (21:28)
Re: CLOG extension Tom Lane (21:34)
Re: Have we out-grown Flex? Jeff Janes (21:36)
Re: CLOG extension Daniel Farina (21:42)
Re: Features of Postgresql and Postgres-xc with MySQL Josh Berkus (21:52)
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Peter Geoghegan (23:49)

2012-05-04

Re: Future In-Core Replication Greg Smith (00:22)
Re: CLOG extension Simon Riggs (07:35)
Re: index-only scans vs. Hot Standby, round two Simon Riggs (08:57)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing (10:39)
Re: Future In-Core Replication Hannu Krosing (12:32)
Re: CLOG extension Robert Haas (12:59)
Re: Future In-Core Replication Robert Haas (13:01)
Re: Future In-Core Replication Robert Haas (13:03)
Re: CLOG extension Simon Riggs (13:11)
Re: Future In-Core Replication Simon Riggs (13:16)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Robert Haas (13:17)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane (13:25)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Tom Lane (13:52)
Re: CLOG extension Robert Haas (14:04)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Robert Haas (14:17)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Tom Lane (14:21)
Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken Robert Haas (14:32)
Re: Future In-Core Replication Greg Smith (15:06)
Re: Future In-Core Replication Robert Haas (16:29)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Andrew Dunstan (16:30)
Re: Beta time? Josh Berkus (16:34)
c-function variants running time Armando (16:41)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Tom Lane (16:56)
Re: Beta time? Tom Lane (16:58)
Re: Future In-Core Replication Andres Freund (16:59)
Re: Future In-Core Replication Robert Haas (17:26)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Robert Haas (17:43)
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Eisentraut (17:45)
Re: Uppercase tab completion keywords in psql? Peter Eisentraut (17:46)
Re: PL/Python result set slicing broken in Python 3 Jan Urbański (18:00)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing (19:44)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing (19:49)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Robert Haas (19:59)
Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby) Jim Nasby (20:04)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Tom Lane (20:12)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing (20:40)
Re: remove dead ports? Marko Kreen (21:11)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? David Johnston (21:24)
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian (22:16)
Re: remove dead ports? Tom Lane (22:25)
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian (22:33)

2012-05-05

Documentation for temp_file_limit Bruce Momjian (02:25)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing (06:06)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing (06:07)
Re: Documentation for temp_file_limit Peter Eisentraut (08:44)
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Eisentraut (08:49)
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Eisentraut (08:59)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Peter Eisentraut (09:06)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Peter Eisentraut (09:13)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Peter Eisentraut (09:16)
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian (12:22)
Re: Uppercase tab completion keywords in psql? Bruce Momjian (13:03)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Hannu Krosing (13:27)
Re: remove dead ports? Tom Lane (15:26)
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian (15:37)
Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? Tom Lane (15:49)
Re: remove dead ports? Tom Lane (16:08)
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Geoghegan (16:23)
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian (16:37)
Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown) Fujii Masao (16:41)
Re: remove dead ports? Bruce Momjian (16:44)
Re: PL/Python result set slicing broken in Python 3 Jan Urbański (20:45)

2012-05-06

Re: remove dead ports? Robert Haas (00:06)
Re: remove dead ports? Peter Geoghegan (00:59)
What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ? Hannu Krosing (10:13)
more possible dead ports cleanup Peter Eisentraut (13:04)
Re: remove dead ports? Tom Lane (14:23)
Re: What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ? Tom Lane (17:17)
Re: What is the current status of FOR UPDATE cursors ? Hannu Krosing (20:55)

2012-05-07

Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown) Albe Laurenz (07:33)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander (08:06)
Re: Temporary tables under hot standby Merlin Moncure (14:04)
9.2 Beta release notes Bruce Momjian (14:36)
Re: more possible dead ports cleanup Robert Haas (14:50)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Tom Lane (15:15)
Re: smart shutdown at end of transaction (was: Default mode for shutdown) Robert Haas (15:59)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Magnus Hagander (16:39)
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. Tom Lane (17:09)
Re: "unexpected EOF" messages Robert Haas (17:18)

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group