Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2011-09-14 00:00

2011-09-14

• Re: New releases for back branches 8.4 and 9.0? Tom Lane (00:28)
• Re: SSL key with passphrase Thom Brown (01:40)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Fujii Masao (01:43)
• [v9.2] make_greater_string() does not return a string in some cases Kyotaro HORIGUCHI (02:13)
• [REVIEW] Generate column names for subquery expressions Kyotaro HORIGUCHI (02:26)
• Re: synchronized snapshots Joachim Wieland (02:37)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? David E. Wheeler (05:24)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? David E. Wheeler (05:25)
• Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build Stefan Keller (06:43)
• Re: DBI-LINK not support special support? Albe Laurenz (07:05)
• [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp Kyotaro HORIGUCHI (09:21)
• WIP: Join push-down for foreign tables Shigeru Hanada (09:24)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Peter Eisentraut (09:33)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? Kaare Rasmussen (10:49)
• Re: Inserting heap tuples in bulk in COPY Heikki Linnakangas (10:52)
• Re: augmenting MultiXacts to improve foreign keys Robert Haas (12:07)
• Initialization of ResultTupleSlot in AppendNode Amit Kapila (12:11)
• Re: WIP: Fast GiST index build Robert Haas (12:12)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? Hannu Krosing (12:12)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? Hannu Krosing (12:40)
• Re: Sponsored development David Fetter (14:12)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? Joshua D. Drake (14:14)
• Re: DBI-LINK not support special support? paulo matadr (14:15)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? David E. Wheeler (15:27)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? Hannu Krosing (15:54)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? Jaime Casanova (16:09)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? Aidan Van Dyk (16:49)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? Jaime Casanova (17:01)
• Constraint exclusion on UNION ALL subqueries with WHERE conditions Gunnlaugur Þór Briem (17:53)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? Josh Berkus (20:15)
• memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs) Robert Haas (20:29)
• Re: foreign table: WARNING: problem in alloc set ExecutorState detected write past chunk end in block ... Josh Kupershmidt (22:22)

2011-09-15

• Re: DBI-LINK not support special support? Robert Haas (03:47)
• Re: What Would You Like To Do? Kaare Rasmussen (07:20)
• Re: DBI-LINK not support special support? Albe Laurenz (07:39)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Fujii Masao (07:54)
• Patch for cursor calling with named parameters Yeb Havinga (08:18)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Dimitri Fontaine (08:44)
• Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp Fujii Masao (08:52)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Peter Eisentraut (10:58)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Robert Haas (11:04)
• Re: Use of literal in SGML docs Robert Haas (12:03)
• Re: Patch for cursor calling with named parameters Cédric Villemain (14:31)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Fujii Masao (14:32)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Tom Lane (14:37)
• psql setenv command Andrew Dunstan (14:44)
• Re: psql setenv command Andrew Dunstan (14:46)
• Re: Double sorting split patch Heikki Linnakangas (15:27)
• Re: Patch for cursor calling with named parameters Yeb Havinga (15:30)
• Re: memory barriers (was: Yes, WaitLatch is vulnerable to weak-memory-ordering bugs) Heikki Linnakangas (15:57)
• Patch: Perl xsubpp David E. Wheeler (16:44)
• ginfastupdate.. slow Jesper Krogh (18:11)
• Re: Double sorting split patch Alexander Korotkov (18:46)
• Re: ginfastupdate.. slow Oleg Bartunov (19:08)
• Re: Patch: Perl xsubpp Alex Hunsaker (21:41)
• Re: Patch: Perl xsubpp David E. Wheeler (21:53)
• Re: Patch: Perl xsubpp Alex Hunsaker (22:04)
• Re: psql setenv command Josh Kupershmidt (22:10)
• Separating bgwriter and checkpointer Simon Riggs (22:53)
• Re: Initialization of ResultTupleSlot in AppendNode Tom Lane (22:53)
• Re: psql setenv command Andrew Dunstan (23:02)

2011-09-16

• Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer Fujii Masao (01:38)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Fujii Masao (02:54)
• Re: Initialization of ResultTupleSlot in AppendNode Amit Kapila (03:48)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Tom Lane (05:32)
• Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Susanne Ebrecht (06:24)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Brendan Jurd (06:38)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Heikki Linnakangas (06:49)
• Re: Initialization of ResultTupleSlot in AppendNode Amit Kapila (06:51)
• Re: Double sorting split patch Heikki Linnakangas (11:07)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Peter Eisentraut (12:13)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Peter Eisentraut (12:25)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Dave Page (12:33)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Merlin Moncure (12:38)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Susanne Ebrecht (12:43)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Dave Page (12:47)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Alvaro Herrera (13:08)
• Re: fstat vs. lseek Andrea Suisani (13:19)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Susanne Ebrecht (13:26)
• Re: fstat vs. lseek Andres Freund (13:30)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Euler Taveira de Oliveira (13:46)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Susanne Ebrecht (13:47)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Euler Taveira de Oliveira (13:52)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Dave Page (13:59)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Susanne Ebrecht (14:10)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Susanne Ebrecht (14:49)
• /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane (14:57)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Dave Page (15:13)
• Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 Matthew Wilcox (15:36)
• Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Greg Stark (15:46)
• Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane (16:37)
• Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Alvaro Herrera (17:17)
• Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane (17:25)
• Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 Andres Freund (17:27)
• Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 Alvaro Herrera (17:39)
• Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 Andi Kleen (17:50)
• Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Alex Hunsaker (18:13)
• Re: SSI heap_insert and page-level predicate locks Tom Lane (18:51)
• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Joshua Berkus (19:22)
• Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 Benjamin LaHaise (20:08)
• Re: force_not_null option support for file_fdw Tom Lane (20:40)
• Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 Andres Freund (21:02)
• Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 Andres Freund (21:05)
• Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 Greg Stark (22:44)
• Re: patch: plpgsql - remove unnecessary ccache search when a array variable is updated Tom Lane (23:27)

2011-09-17

• [WIP] Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v2 Marti Raudsepp (01:08)
• Re: Double sorting split patch Alexander Korotkov (14:36)
• Re: Double sorting split patch Heikki Linnakangas (17:00)
• Re: Double sorting split patch Alexander Korotkov (17:36)
• Re: Double sorting split patch Peter Geoghegan (20:09)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Josh Berkus (22:57)

2011-09-18

• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Jaime Casanova (00:36)
• Re: Double sorting split patch Greg Stark (00:51)
• Adding CORRESPONDING to Set Operations Kerem Kat (09:39)
• Re: Double sorting split patch Peter Geoghegan (13:11)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Peter Eisentraut (14:08)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Peter Eisentraut (14:14)
• Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Peter Eisentraut (14:19)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Dave Page (14:45)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Kevin Grittner (15:12)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Peter Eisentraut (15:22)
• 2011-09 CF underway Kevin Grittner (15:46)
• Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor Erik Rijkers (16:08)
• Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane (16:21)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Tom Lane (16:43)
• Grouping Sets David Rinaldi (19:08)
• Re: [WIP] Caching constant stable expressions per execution Marti Raudsepp (22:25)
• Re: [REVIEW] Generate column names for subquery expressions Marti Raudsepp (23:28)

2011-09-19

• Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf Robert Haas (00:11)
• Re: Constraint exclusion on UNION ALL subqueries with WHERE conditions Tom Lane (03:59)
• Re: pg_upgrade automatic testing Peter Eisentraut (04:06)
• Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor Jeff Davis (05:51)
• Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor Pavel Stehule (07:30)
• Cross-compile of 3rd-party extensions fails Boszormenyi Zoltan (08:16)
• Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Peter Eisentraut (08:25)
• Re: Cross-compile of 3rd-party extensions fails Peter Eisentraut (08:27)
• Re: Cross-compile of 3rd-party extensions fails Marko Kreen (08:53)
• Re: Cross-compile of 3rd-party extensions fails Boszormenyi Zoltan (08:54)
• Re: Adding CORRESPONDING to Set Operations Kerem Kat (08:57)
• CUDA Sorting Vitor Reus (12:11)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Thom Brown (12:27)
• Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 Stephen Frost (12:31)
• Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 Matthew Wilcox (13:25)
• Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 Robert Haas (13:30)
• Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor Robert Haas (13:33)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Thom Brown (13:41)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Josh Berkus (13:50)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Greg Stark (14:12)
• Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels Tom Lane (14:18)
• A little pg_dump patch Enrico Pirozzi (14:34)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Greg Smith (14:36)
• Generating a query that never returns Dave Cramer (14:48)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Thom Brown (14:53)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Greg Stark (14:54)
• Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress Greg Smith (14:55)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Joe Abbate (14:58)
• Re: Generating a query that never returns Tom Lane (15:04)
• Re: A little pg_dump patch Andrew Dunstan (15:07)
• Re: Generating a query that never returns Greg Sabino Mullane (15:09)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Thom Brown (15:10)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Thom Brown (15:12)
• Re: Generating a query that never returns Florian Pflug (15:12)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Susanne Ebrecht (15:14)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Tom Lane (15:16)
• Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress Tom Lane (15:19)
• Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor Florian Pflug (15:23)
• Re: A little pg_dump patch Enrico Pirozzi (15:23)
• Re: A little pg_dump patch Andrew Dunstan (15:32)
• Re: A little pg_dump patch Enrico Pirozzi (15:42)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Vitor Reus (15:43)
• Re: A little pg_dump patch Greg Sabino Mullane (15:44)
• Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor Jeff Davis (15:46)
• Re: A little pg_dump patch Enrico Pirozzi (15:57)
• Re: Generating a query that never returns David Fetter (15:59)
• Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor Kevin Grittner (16:00)
• Re: Generating a query that never returns Florian Pflug (16:09)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Nulik Nol (16:16)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Christopher Browne (16:18)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? David Fetter (16:20)
• Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor Robert Haas (16:26)
• Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor Florian Pflug (16:32)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Andrew Dunstan (16:33)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Christopher Browne (16:40)
• Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor Jeff Davis (16:48)
• Review for EXPLAIN and nfiltered Marc Cousin (16:51)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Vitor Reus (17:11)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Joe Abbate (17:16)
• Re: Review for EXPLAIN and nfiltered Robert Haas (17:17)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Stephen Frost (17:46)
• Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress Dimitri Fontaine (18:42)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Dimitri Fontaine (18:59)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Greg Smith (19:09)
• Re: Review for EXPLAIN and nfiltered Marc Cousin (19:10)
• Re: Review for EXPLAIN and nfiltered Robert Haas (19:22)
• Re: CUDA Sorting PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig (19:41)
• Re: CUDA Sorting Cédric Villemain (19:48)
• Re: Grouping Sets Joshua Tolley (19:56)
• [PATCH] Use new oom_score_adj without a new compile-time constant Dan McGee (20:11)
• Re: [PATCH] Use new oom_score_adj without a new compile-time constant Dan McGee (20:36)
• Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? Greg Smith (20:44)