Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2010-07-28 00:00

2010-07-28

• Re: Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Tom Lane (00:27)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution David E. Wheeler (02:55)
• Re: Improper usage of MemoryContext in nodeSubplan.c for buildSubPlanHash() function. This maybe causes allocate memory failed. Tom Lane (03:18)
• Re: Performance Enhancement/Fix for Array Utility Functions Robert Haas (03:43)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (04:23)
• Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 Andrew Dunstan (04:41)
• Re: Improper usage of MemoryContext in nodeSubplan.c for buildSubPlanHash() function. This maybe causes allocate memory failed. Tom Lane (04:55)
• Re: Performance Enhancement/Fix for Array Utility Functions Mike Lewis (05:20)
• Re: Query optimization problem Dimitri Fontaine (07:45)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Boxuan Zhai (10:08)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Robert Haas (10:28)
• Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 Mark Cave-Ayland (10:29)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (10:40)
• Re: Query optimization problem Robert Haas (10:44)
• Re: Query optimization problem Dimitri Fontaine (10:55)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Simon Riggs (11:02)
• Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 Andrew Dunstan (11:10)
• Re: Query optimization problem Robert Haas (11:13)
• Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 Mark Cave-Ayland (11:22)
• Re: Query optimization problem Yeb Havinga (11:24)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (11:29)
• Re: Query optimization problem Robert Haas (11:30)
• Re: Query optimization problem Dimitri Fontaine (11:31)
• patch saved in commitfest application isn't actual now Pavel Stehule (11:43)
• Re: Query optimization problem Yeb Havinga (12:02)
• Re: **[SPAM]*(8.2)** Re: Query optimization problem Zotov (12:19)
• Re: ALTER TABLE SET STATISTICS requires AccessExclusiveLock Peter Eisentraut (12:24)
• Re: ALTER TABLE SET STATISTICS requires AccessExclusiveLock Simon Riggs (13:49)
• Re: Query optimization problem Tom Lane (14:34)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution Joshua D. Drake (14:57)
• Re: ALTER TABLE SET STATISTICS requires AccessExclusiveLock Simon Riggs (15:19)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Boxuan Zhai (15:51)
• Re: ERROR: argument to pg_get_expr() must come from system catalogs Bruce Momjian (15:54)
• Re: ERROR: argument to pg_get_expr() must come from system catalogs Dave Page (15:58)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (16:12)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution David E. Wheeler (16:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Trouble with COPY IN James William Pye (16:31)
• Re: Toward a column reorder solution Joshua D. Drake (16:33)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane (16:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Trouble with COPY IN Kris Jurka (16:53)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (17:18)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (17:18)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (17:28)
• Re: Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Oleg Bartunov (18:00)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane (18:21)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (18:50)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane (19:00)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (19:08)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (19:09)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane (19:16)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane (19:37)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (19:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] Trouble with COPY IN James William Pye (20:19)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Jeff Davis (21:22)
• Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output Greg Smith (22:48)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Robert Haas (22:58)
• Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Jeff Davis (23:09)
• Re: documentation for committing with git Daniel Farina (23:22)
• Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Tom Lane (23:33)
• Re: do we need to postpone beta4? Tom Lane (23:36)

2010-07-29

• Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Tom Lane (00:25)
• Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Jeff Davis (00:51)
• Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output Florian Pflug (01:23)
• Re: including backend ID in relpath of temp rels - updated patch Jaime Casanova (06:56)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Simon Riggs (08:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Trouble with COPY IN Matthew Wakeling (09:15)
• patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Henk Enting (10:57)
• Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Oleg Bartunov (11:03)
• Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review Boszormenyi Zoltan (11:55)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (13:10)
• review: xml_is_well_formed Pavel Stehule (13:21)
• Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Tom Lane (14:03)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane (14:35)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (14:48)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Tom Lane (15:09)
• Re: non-overlapping, consecutive partitions Hans-Jürgen Schönig (15:12)
• Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function Alexander Korotkov (15:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] CommitFest 2010-07 week one progress report Kevin Grittner (15:46)
• Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Tom Lane (16:03)
• Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Oleg Bartunov (16:13)
• Re: page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby Robert Haas (16:17)
• Re: [GENERAL] Incorrect FTS result with GIN index Tom Lane (16:28)
• Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Pavel Stehule (16:37)
• Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Tom Lane (17:00)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas (17:04)
• Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Robert Haas (17:06)
• On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (17:08)
• Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Tom Lane (17:10)
• Re: On Scalability Joshua D. Drake (17:12)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane (17:20)
• Re: string_to_array has to be stable? Robert Haas (17:20)
• Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (17:34)
• Re: On Scalability Joshua D. Drake (17:39)
• Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (17:52)
• Re: On Scalability Joshua D. Drake (18:16)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas (18:35)
• Re: Performance Enhancement/Fix for Array Utility Functions Robert Haas (19:29)
• Re: knngist - 0.8 Alexander Korotkov (19:38)
• Re: On Scalability Josh Berkus (20:09)
• Re: multibyte charater set in levenshtein function Robert Haas (20:16)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane (20:37)
• Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions Erik Rijkers (20:43)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas (20:45)
• Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached ) Erik Rijkers (20:49)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Robert Haas (20:51)
• Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions Robert Haas (20:53)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane (21:03)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas (21:25)
• Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (21:30)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane (21:35)
• Re: ERROR: argument to pg_get_expr() must come from system catalogs Tom Lane (23:17)
• review patch: Distinguish between unique indexes and unique constraints Kevin Grittner (23:56)

2010-07-30

• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas (04:36)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane (05:13)
• Re: ERROR: argument to pg_get_expr() must come from system catalogs Dave Page (08:07)
• Re: patch (for 9.1) string functions ( correct patch attached ) Pavel Stehule (09:56)
• Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (10:24)
• Re: On Scalability Greg Stark (10:49)
• Re: TwoPO: experimental join order algorithm Jan Urbański (11:02)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas (11:22)
• Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (11:40)
• Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Mike Fowler (11:50)
• Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Pavel Stehule (12:51)
• Re: ERROR: argument to pg_get_expr() must come from system catalogs Tom Lane (13:13)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane (13:16)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (13:45)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Tom Lane (14:11)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (14:19)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Tom Lane (14:23)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (14:32)
• Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review Marc Cousin (14:35)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Tom Lane (14:46)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Yeb Havinga (15:30)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (15:35)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Tom Lane (15:39)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (15:48)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Greg Smith (16:21)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (16:22)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Robert Haas (16:31)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Andres Freund (16:33)
• Re: gincostestimate Jan Urbański (17:19)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Alex Hunsaker (17:34)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas (17:42)
• Re: gincostestimate Robert Haas (18:03)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane (18:08)
• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Tom Lane (18:11)
• Re: On Scalability Josh Berkus (18:51)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Yeb Havinga (19:22)
• Re: On Scalability Vincenzo Romano (19:50)
• Re: On Scalability Greg Smith (20:38)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Yeb Havinga (20:38)
• Re: On Scalability Robert Haas (20:39)
• reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two Robert Haas (21:58)
• Re: lock_timeout GUC patch - Review Alvaro Herrera (23:06)

2010-07-31

• Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1 Robert Haas (01:55)
• ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Tom Lane (03:53)
• rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Tom Lane (04:40)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefaultopckeytype Stephen Frost (11:08)
• Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Peter Eisentraut (12:10)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Robert Haas (12:42)
• More fun with GIN lossy-page pointers Tom Lane (13:57)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Tom Lane (15:00)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Robert Haas (15:46)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Tom Lane (16:02)
• Re: patch for check constraints using multiple inheritance Robert Haas (16:02)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Tom Lane (16:06)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Robert Haas (16:12)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Tom Lane (16:32)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Robert Haas (16:34)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Tom Lane (16:44)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Robert Haas (17:32)
• Re: review: xml_is_well_formed Robert Haas (17:40)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Kevin Grittner (19:26)

2010-08-01

• Re: review patch: Distinguish between unique indexes and unique constraints Robert Haas (01:11)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefaultopckeytype Stephen Frost (01:16)
• Re: More fun with GIN lossy-page pointers Alvaro Herrera (01:35)
• Re: More fun with GIN lossy-page pointers Tom Lane (01:38)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Robert Haas (01:48)
• Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Robert Haas (02:10)
• Re: rbtree code breaks GIN's adherence to maintenance_work_mem Tom Lane (02:31)
• Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Tom Lane (02:46)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Tom Lane (03:15)
• Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Pavel Stehule (04:15)
• Re: merge command - GSoC progress Boxuan Zhai (05:03)
• Re: Synchronous replication Heikki Linnakangas (06:11)
• Re: documentation for committing with git Heikki Linnakangas (09:08)
• Re: review patch: Distinguish between unique indexes and unique constraints Kevin Grittner (10:54)
• Re: Synchronous replication Greg Stark (12:30)
• Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Robert Haas (12:37)
• Re: Synchronous replication Robert Haas (12:51)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Robert Haas (12:54)
• Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Pavel Stehule (13:20)
• Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Tom Lane (14:47)
• Re: review patch: Distinguish between unique indexes and unique constraints Robert Haas (15:07)
• Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Robert Haas (15:09)
• Re: More fun with GIN lossy-page pointers Tom Lane (15:16)
• Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Pavel Stehule (15:22)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Kevin Grittner (15:34)
• Re: review: psql: edit function, show function commands patch Tom Lane (15:35)
• Re: ANALYZE versus expression indexes with nondefault opckeytype Tom Lane (15:54)