Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2007-03-05 00:00

2007-03-05

• Re: xpath_array with namespaces support Nikolay Samokhvalov (01:20)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (01:36)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (02:32)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (02:35)
• Automatic adjustment of bgwriter_lru_maxpages (was: Dead Space Map version 2) ITAGAKI Takahiro (04:10)
• Automatic adjustment of bgwriter_lru_maxpages (was: Dead Space Map version 2) ITAGAKI Takahiro (04:11)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Mark Kirkwood (05:03)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Gavin Sherry (05:16)
• Re: ERROR: operator does not exist: integer !=- integer William ZHANG (05:34)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (05:52)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (06:25)
• Optimized pgbench for 8.3 ITAGAKI Takahiro (07:11)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Grzegorz Jaskiewicz (08:17)
• Re: Automatic adjustment of bgwriter_lru_maxpages ITAGAKI Takahiro (08:22)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (08:24)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (08:28)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (08:30)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (08:45)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (08:51)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Heikki Linnakangas (09:09)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Hannu Krosing (09:10)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (09:15)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Florian Weimer (09:20)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Hannu Krosing (09:41)
• Restartable VACUUM design overview version 2 Galy Lee (09:48)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (09:58)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Mark Kirkwood (10:00)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (10:04)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Gregory Stark (10:10)
• Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum ITAGAKI Takahiro (10:14)
• Stream bitmaps Heikki Linnakangas (10:32)
• Re: Stream bitmaps Gavin Sherry (11:11)
• XQuery or XPathサポート Tatsuo Ishii (11:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] XQuery or XPathサポート Nikolay Samokhvalov (11:51)
• Re: Re: [HACKERS] XQuery or XPathサポート Tatsuo Ishii (12:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] XQuery or XPathサポート Nikolay Samokhvalov (12:24)
• [ANN] SE-PostgreSQL 8.2.3-1.0 alpha release KaiGai Kohei (12:29)
• Re: Re: [HACKERS] XQuery or XPathサポート Tatsuo Ishii (12:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] XQuery or XPathサポート Nikolay Samokhvalov (12:54)
• Re: PrivateRefCount (for 8.3) NikhilS (13:58)
• Latest plans for Utilities with HOT Simon Riggs (15:14)
• Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Tom Lane (16:02)
• Re: HOT - whats next ? Simon Riggs (16:03)
• Re: Latest plans for Utilities with HOT Pavan Deolasee (16:09)
• Re: PrivateRefCount (for 8.3) Tom Lane (16:28)
• proposal: custom variables management Pavel Stehule (16:29)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev (16:29)
• Re: Latest plans for Utilities with HOT Simon Riggs (16:32)
• Re: HOT - whats next ? Tom Lane (16:39)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (16:53)
• Re: HOT - whats next ? Simon Riggs (16:54)
• Re: Latest plans for Utilities with HOT Pavan Deolasee (16:55)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (17:22)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Pavan Deolasee (17:22)
• Re: HOT - whats next ? Andrew Dunstan (17:29)
• Re: HOT - whats next ? Simon Riggs (17:38)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (17:44)
• Re: PrivateRefCount (for 8.3) Stefan Kaltenbrunner (18:06)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Josh Berkus (18:20)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (18:21)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (18:24)
• Re: Synchronized Scan update Jeff Davis (18:39)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (18:44)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Pavan Deolasee (18:46)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Josh Berkus (18:46)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (18:55)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Gregory Stark (19:02)
• Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Florian G. Pflug (19:26)
• Re: [PATCHES] Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Heikki Linnakangas (19:30)
• My time off Bruce Momjian (19:32)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs (19:34)
• Re: [PATCHES] Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Florian G. Pflug (19:41)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (19:41)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (19:42)
• Time-correlated columns in large tables Jeroen T. Vermeulen (19:49)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs (20:06)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis (20:11)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis (20:12)
• Re: Time-correlated columns in large tables Heikki Linnakangas (20:17)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (20:18)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis (20:19)
• Re: proposal: custom variables management Tom Lane (20:23)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (20:30)
• Re: Time-correlated columns in large tables Jeroen T. Vermeulen (20:39)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis (20:45)
• Re: HOT - whats next ? Tom Lane (20:45)
• Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option A.M. (20:55)
• Re: proposal: custom variables management Pavel Stehule (20:56)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (21:03)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Heikki Linnakangas (21:03)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Mark Kirkwood (21:28)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (21:36)
• Re: proposal: custom variables management Andrew Dunstan (21:42)
• Re: proposal: custom variables management Pavel Stehule (22:02)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Mark Kirkwood (22:07)
• xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Mike Rylander (22:18)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (22:19)
• Re: proposal: custom variables management Andrew Dunstan (22:32)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis (22:43)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC temp_tablespaces to provide a default location for Tom Lane (22:45)
• Re: proposal: custom variables management Tom Lane (23:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Bruce Momjian (23:34)
• Re: Updated propsoal for read-only queries on PITR slaves (SoC 2007) Jim Nasby (23:37)
• Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Jim Nasby (23:42)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Florian G. Pflug (23:54)
• Re: proposal: custom variables management Andrew Dunstan (23:54)

2007-03-06

• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Mark Kirkwood (00:06)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (00:43)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Gregory Stark (01:31)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (01:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC temp_tablespaces to provide a default location for Bruce Momjian (02:08)
• Re: [PATCHES] Marc G. Fournier (02:32)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (02:39)
• Re: [PATCHES] Gavin Sherry (02:51)
• Re: [PATCHES] Tom Lane (02:59)
• Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Jim Nasby (03:04)
• Re: Restartable VACUUM design overview version 2 Jim Nasby (03:25)
• Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith (03:34)
• Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Greg Smith (03:38)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (03:58)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jim Nasby (04:02)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jim Nasby (04:11)
• Re: proposal: custom variables management Tom Lane (04:15)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Luke Lonergan (04:23)
• Re: PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD Neil Conway (04:56)
• Re: PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD Tom Lane (05:18)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (05:29)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Sherry Moore (05:34)
• NTA access on Solaris Sherry Moore (05:41)
• Re: proposal: custom variables management Pavel Stehule (06:38)
• Re: proposal: custom variables management David Fetter (06:44)
• Re: PrivateRefCount (for 8.3) NikhilS (06:47)
• Re: NTA access on Solaris Sherry Moore (06:50)
• Re: NTA access on Solaris Sherry Moore (06:53)
• Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Tom Lane (07:15)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (07:17)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Simon Riggs (08:14)
• Re: PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD Neil Conway (08:17)
• user-defined tree methods in GIST sharath kumar (08:20)
• Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Peter Eisentraut (08:49)
• Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Nikolay Samokhvalov (09:12)
• Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum ITAGAKI Takahiro (10:03)
• Re: PL/Python warnings in CVS HEAD Marko Kreen (10:04)
• A Survey on Defect Management Practices in Free/Open Source Software Anu Gupta DCSA (10:14)
• Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Gregory Stark (11:12)
• Re: user-defined tree methods in GIST Martijn van Oosterhout (11:36)
• Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS (11:57)
• Re: Latest plans for Utilities with HOT Simon Riggs (12:02)
• Re: Updated propsoal for read-only queries on PITR slaves (SoC 2007) Florian G. Pflug (12:23)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions Peter Eisentraut (12:40)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark (12:42)
• Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Mike Rylander (13:01)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS (13:01)
• Re: [PATCHES] xml2 contrib patch supporting default XML namespaces Mike Rylander (13:08)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions Gregory Stark (13:57)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS (14:11)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions NikhilS (14:13)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Andrew - Supernews (14:53)
• Re: Aggressive freezing in lazy-vacuum Tom Lane (15:02)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev (15:06)
• Re: user-defined tree methods in GIST Teodor Sigaev (15:14)
• Re: Log levels for checkpoint/bgwriter monitoring Jim Nasby (15:39)
• Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Gaetano Mendola (15:48)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark (16:07)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions Shane Ambler (16:13)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark (16:20)
• Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! David Fetter (16:27)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark (16:31)
• No buffer space available Nik (16:33)
• Re: Synchronized Scan update Josh Berkus (16:43)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev (16:43)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev (16:48)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark (16:55)
• Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Chris Browne (16:57)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions Chris Browne (17:01)
• Estimating seq_page_fetch and random_page_fetch Umar Farooq Minhas (17:06)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev (17:10)
• Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements Tom Lane (17:22)
• Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Josh Berkus (17:23)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions Martijn van Oosterhout (17:43)
• Re: Calculated view fields (8.1 != 8.2) Tom Lane (17:47)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Gregory Stark (17:48)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis (17:56)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Tom Lane (17:59)
• Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Tom Lane (18:02)
• Re: Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements Gregory Stark (18:04)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Jeff Davis (18:09)
• Re: Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements Tom Lane (18:14)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions Florian G. Pflug (18:27)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Heikki Linnakangas (18:29)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions Peter Eisentraut (18:35)
• Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Josh Berkus (18:43)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions Tom Lane (18:44)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions Josh Berkus (18:44)
• Re: [JDBC] Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements Dave Cramer (18:45)
• Re: GIST and TOAST Teodor Sigaev (18:45)
• Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant Heikki Linnakangas (18:47)
• Re: Auto creation of Partitions Josh Berkus (19:04)
• Re: Plan invalidation vs. unnamed prepared statements andyk (19:25)
• Re: PostgreSQL - 'SKYLINE OF' clause added! Alvaro Herrera (20:10)