Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2007-01-18 00:00

Jan. 18, 2007

• Re: Design notes for EquivalenceClasses Gavin Sherry (00:13)
• Re: Function execution costs 'n all that Jeff Davis (00:37)
• Re: Design notes for EquivalenceClasses Tom Lane (00:46)
• Re: Function execution costs 'n all that Tom Lane (00:50)
• Re: Design notes for EquivalenceClasses Gavin Sherry (00:53)
• Re: Idea for fixing the Windows fsync problem Takayuki Tsunakawa (02:09)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix failure due to accessing an Tatsuo Ishii (02:20)
• Re: ideas for auto-processing patches markwkm (02:35)
• Re: What is the motivation of include directive and Takayuki Tsunakawa (03:05)
• pg_trigger.tgargs needs detoast Kenji Kawamura (09:04)
• Scanner/Parser question - what does _P imply? korryd (10:24)
• Re: Scanner/Parser question - what does _P imply? korryd (10:57)
• Re: Design notes for EquivalenceClasses Simon Riggs (11:36)
• Re: pgsql: Fix failure due to accessing an Tatsuo Ishii (13:49)
• Re: ideas for auto-processing patches Andrew Dunstan (14:22)
• Re: What is the motivation of include directive and Andrew Dunstan (14:37)
• Re: Temparary disable constraint Adnan DURSUN (15:20)
• Re: Scanner/Parser question - what does _P imply? Tom Lane (15:35)
• Re: Temparary disable constraint Richard Huxton (15:57)
• Re: Design notes for EquivalenceClasses Teodor Sigaev (15:59)
• Re: Design notes for EquivalenceClasses Tom Lane (16:21)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix failure due to accessing an Tom Lane (16:42)
• Re: Corrupt database? 8.1/FreeBSD6.0 Alvaro Herrera (16:42)
• Re: Corrupt database? 8.1/FreeBSD6.0 Tom Lane (16:52)
• Re: Design notes for EquivalenceClasses Teodor Sigaev (17:24)
• Re: Temparary disable constraint Adnan DURSUN (22:09)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix failure due to accessing an Tatsuo Ishii (22:30)
• Windows buildfarm failures Alvaro Herrera (23:13)
• Re: Windows buildfarm failures Tom Lane (23:33)

Jan. 19, 2007

• Re: Windows buildfarm failures Alvaro Herrera (00:18)
• pg_trigger.tgargs needs detoast Kenji Kawamura (00:31)
• Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct input Gavin Sherry (03:46)
• BUG #2907: pg_get_serial_sequence quoting Adriaan van Os (05:52)
• Re: pg_get_domaindef Neil Conway (06:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Simon Riggs (09:47)
• Re: Design notes for EquivalenceClasses Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD (10:42)
• Re: Windows buildfarm failures Alvaro Herrera (11:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and Bruce Momjian (13:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Darcy Buskermolen (14:48)
• Re: Windows buildfarm failures Stefan Kaltenbrunner (15:25)
• pg_get_domaindef FAST PostgreSQL (15:28)
• Re: Windows buildfarm failures Andrew Dunstan (15:46)
• Re: Windows buildfarm failures Alvaro Herrera (15:51)
• Re: Design notes for EquivalenceClasses Tom Lane (16:55)
• Re: Fix for bug in plpython bool type conversion Bruce Momjian (17:02)
• Re: Windows buildfarm failures Tom Lane (17:06)
• Re: pg_get_domaindef FAST PostgreSQL (17:44)
• Re: pg_trigger.tgargs needs detoast Bruce Momjian (18:06)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct input Tom Lane (18:12)
• Re: Windows buildfarm failures Tom Lane (18:34)
• Re: Windows buildfarm failures Andrew Dunstan (18:47)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct input Karen Hill (19:43)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Stefan Kaltenbrunner (19:57)
• savepoint improvements Merlin Moncure (20:12)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Karen Hill (20:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Bruce Momjian (21:36)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Gavin Sherry (21:53)
• Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] [Fwd: Index Advisor] Bruce Momjian (22:31)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Gavin Sherry (22:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Russell Smith (22:41)

Jan. 20, 2007

• pg_dump pretty_print Greg Sabino Mullane (01:01)
• Re: BUG #2907: pg_get_serial_sequence quoting Bruce Momjian (01:38)
• Re: O_DIRECT support for Windows Bruce Momjian (01:41)
• Re: [GENERAL] Corrupt database? Bruce Momjian (04:32)
• Re: savepoint improvements Tom Lane (04:33)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Tom Lane (04:40)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Gavin Sherry (04:58)
• Re: pg_dump pretty_print Tom Lane (05:02)
• Re: BUG #2907: pg_get_serial_sequence quoting Tom Lane (05:03)
• Re: savepoint improvements Dennis Bjorklund (05:26)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Tom Lane (07:05)
• Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] [Fwd: Index Advisor] Gurjeet Singh (07:37)
• Re: pg_dump pretty_print Peter Eisentraut (08:59)
• Re: BUG #2907: pg_get_serial_sequence quoting Adriaan van Os (09:20)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Markus Schiltknecht (10:12)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Simon Riggs (10:28)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Simon Riggs (11:06)
• Re: O_DIRECT support for Windows Magnus Hagander (11:17)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Alvaro Herrera (12:18)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Gavin Sherry (12:54)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Gavin Sherry (13:19)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Gregory Stark (13:36)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Oleg Bartunov (13:44)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Gregory Stark (13:48)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Gavin Sherry (13:57)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Simon Riggs (14:20)
• Re: [BUGS] BUG #2907: pg_get_serial_sequence quoting Bruce Momjian (14:27)
• Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct Simon Riggs (14:29)
• XML regression test failure Neil Conway (17:07)
• Re: savepoint improvements Merlin Moncure (17:08)
• Re: Windows buildfarm failures Stefan Kaltenbrunner (17:10)
• Re: Windows buildfarm failures Tom Lane (17:17)
• Re: Windows buildfarm failures Tom Lane (18:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Indicate disabled triggers in \d Bruce Momjian (21:21)
• Simplifying pg_am representation of index sortability Tom Lane (21:29)
• Re: XML regression test failure Peter Eisentraut (21:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] wal buffers documentation -errata Bruce Momjian (21:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] setseed() doc Bruce Momjian (21:48)
• Re: XML regression test failure Tom Lane (21:54)
• Re: Concurrent connections in psql Bruce Momjian (22:11)

Jan. 21, 2007

• Re: Function execution costs 'n all that Tom Lane (01:39)
• Re: [BUGS] BUG #2907: pg_get_serial_sequence quoting Tom Lane (01:56)
• ECPG regression tests seem rather fundamentally broken Tom Lane (06:02)
• Compile error in tab-complete.c on OS X (bug 2838) Jim C. Nasby (07:05)
• Re: Compile error in tab-complete.c on OS X (bug 2838) Tom Lane (07:19)
• Re: XML regression test failure Peter Eisentraut (07:36)
• Re: Concurrent connections in psql Jim C. Nasby (08:01)
• send password to pg_dump shaunc (08:28)
• Re: ECPG regression tests seem rather fundamentally broken Peter Eisentraut (08:29)
• Re: ECPG regression tests seem rather fundamentally broken Tom Lane (08:44)
• Re: Simplifying pg_am representation of index sortability Gregory Stark (09:39)
• Re: Simplifying pg_am representation of index sortability Martijn van Oosterhout (11:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Heikki Linnakangas (11:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Simon Riggs (12:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Martijn van Oosterhout (13:44)
• Re: savepoint improvements Simon Riggs (15:50)
• Re: XML regression test failure Simon Riggs (15:57)
• Re: savepoint improvements Jaime Casanova (17:40)
• Re: Simplifying pg_am representation of index sortability Tom Lane (17:54)
• Re: savepoint improvements Tom Lane (18:28)
• Re: savepoint improvements Joshua D. Drake (18:37)
• Re: savepoint improvements Tom Lane (18:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Jim C. Nasby (20:26)

Jan. 22, 2007

• Re: Function execution costs 'n all that Tom Lane (03:51)
• DROP FUNCTION failure: cache lookup failed for relation X Michael Fuhr (04:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too simplistic Bruce Momjian (04:52)
• Re: DROP FUNCTION failure: cache lookup failed for relation X Tom Lane (07:07)
• Re: savepoint improvements Simon Riggs (08:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Simon Riggs (09:09)
• Re: savepoint improvements Csaba Nagy (09:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] BUG #2907: pg_get_serial_sequence quoting Adriaan van Os (09:19)
• STOP all user access except for admin for a few minutes? org (09:32)
• Re: STOP all user access except for admin for a few minutes? Russell Smith (09:57)
• Re: STOP all user access except for admin for a few minutes? Peter Eisentraut (09:59)
• Strange file in snapshot tarball ITAGAKI Takahiro (11:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Heikki Linnakangas (11:21)
• Re: Strange file in snapshot tarball Michael Meskes (12:11)
• Re: [PATCHES] pg_standby Simon Riggs (13:06)
• Re: savepoint improvements Merlin Moncure (14:25)
• Re: savepoint improvements Merlin Moncure (14:40)
• Piggybacking vacuum I/O Heikki Linnakangas (14:51)
• Re: savepoint improvements Simon Riggs (15:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Bruce Momjian (15:30)
• pg_dump ANALYZE statements Simon Riggs (15:40)
• Re: savepoint improvements Merlin Moncure (15:40)
• Re: savepoint improvements Tom Lane (15:46)
• Re: savepoint improvements Martijn van Oosterhout (15:48)
• Re: pg_dump ANALYZE statements Tom Lane (15:49)
• Re: pg_dump ANALYZE statements Stefan Kaltenbrunner (15:50)
• Re: savepoint improvements Simon Riggs (15:52)
• Re: pg_dump ANALYZE statements Gregory Stark (15:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Heikki Linnakangas (15:56)
• Re: savepoint improvements Gregory Stark (16:11)
• Re: pg_dump ANALYZE statements Simon Riggs (16:19)
• Re: savepoint improvements Merlin Moncure (16:21)
• Re: savepoint improvements Simon Riggs (16:22)
• Re: savepoint improvements Merlin Moncure (17:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Bruce Momjian (17:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Simon Riggs (17:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Gregory Stark (17:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Bruce Momjian (18:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too Bruce Momjian (18:33)
• Re: savepoint improvements Martijn van Oosterhout (18:33)
• Re: savepoint improvements Dawid Kuroczko (18:37)
• Re: Piggybacking vacuum I/O Simon Riggs (18:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Gregory Stark (18:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Simon Riggs (18:42)
• Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work) korryd (18:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too Alvaro Herrera (18:46)
• Re: savepoint improvements Merlin Moncure (18:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too Bruce Momjian (18:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Kenneth Marshall (19:00)
• Re: savepoint improvements Merlin Moncure (19:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Alvaro Herrera (19:07)
• Re: savepoint improvements Alvaro Herrera (19:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Richard Huxton (19:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Heikki Linnakangas (19:19)
• Re: savepoint improvements Merlin Moncure (19:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too Tom Lane (19:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Heikki Linnakangas (19:24)
• autovacuum process handling Alvaro Herrera (19:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Kenneth Marshall (19:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too Bruce Momjian (19:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Bruce Momjian (19:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too Tom Lane (19:48)
• Re: pg_dump pretty_print Greg Sabino Mullane (19:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too Bruce Momjian (19:54)
• Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Improvements Ron Mayer (20:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Joris Dobbelsteen (21:15)
• Re: autovacuum process handling Matthew T. O'Connor (22:04)
• Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work) Jonah H. Harris (22:15)
• 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work) Joshua D. Drake (22:16)
• Re: 10 weeks to feature freeze (Pending Work) Oleg Bartunov (22:25)
• Re: send password to pg_dump Andrew Dunstan (22:34)
• Re: Piggybacking vacuum I/O Jim C. Nasby (22:49)
• Re: [GENERAL] Autovacuum Improvements Jim C. Nasby (23:11)
• Re: pg_dump ANALYZE statements Jim C. Nasby (23:20)
• Re: [pgsql-patches] Win32 WEXITSTATUS too Bruce Momjian (23:21)
• Re: autovacuum process handling Jim C. Nasby (23:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum Improvements Steve Atkins (23:39)