Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2006-06-25 00:00

2006-06-25

• Re: Gist does not build with VC++ anymore Bruce Momjian (01:03)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Bruce Momjian (01:45)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Bruce Momjian (02:31)
• Re: vacuum row? Alvaro Herrera (03:29)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing (06:49)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Michael Meskes (09:45)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (10:52)
• Re: Buffer for inner and outer table Daniel Xavier de Sousa (15:06)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (16:27)
• Re: vacuum row? Jonah H. Harris (16:29)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jan Wieck (17:02)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jan Wieck (17:09)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jan Wieck (17:30)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas (18:13)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (18:24)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (18:52)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jan Wieck (19:21)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing (19:42)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing (19:51)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (21:18)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (21:19)
• Re: xlog viewer proposal Diogo Biazus (23:19)
• Table clustering idea Dawid Kuroczko (23:48)

2006-06-26

• Re: Table clustering idea Luke Lonergan (00:04)
• Re: Table clustering idea Josh Berkus (00:05)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (01:29)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jan Wieck (02:08)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (02:12)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jan Wieck (05:17)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Alvaro Herrera (05:49)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas (06:34)
• Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Dave Page (07:28)
• Re: vacuum row? Csaba Nagy (09:05)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (10:38)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (10:39)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (11:17)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD (12:34)
• Re: libpq Describe Extension [WAS: Bytea and perl] Martijn van Oosterhout (12:43)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (12:45)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Martijn van Oosterhout (12:56)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Bruce Momjian (13:06)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (13:07)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (13:10)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (13:17)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (13:18)
• ERROR: invalid page header in block Alexandru Coseru (13:28)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (13:37)
• Re: vacuum row? Mark Woodward (13:37)
• Re: vacuum row? A.M. (13:57)
• Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Devrim GUNDUZ (14:02)
• Re: vacuum row? Jonah H. Harris (14:04)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing (14:15)
• "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane (14:36)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing (14:47)
• Re: UTF8 server-side on Win32? Oswaldo Hernández (14:48)
• Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Martijn van Oosterhout (14:48)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (14:50)
• Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane (14:56)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Martijn van Oosterhout (14:58)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing (14:58)
• Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Robert Treat (15:07)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing (15:15)
• Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Bort, Paul (15:28)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (15:29)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (15:31)
• Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Dave Page (15:38)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC, and compression PFC (15:43)
• Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane (15:44)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC, and compression Bruce Momjian (15:45)
• Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Dave Page (15:45)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC, and compression PFC (15:55)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD (16:06)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (16:21)
• Inheritance, CREATE TABLE LIKE, and partitioned tables Greg Stark (16:31)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Bruce Momjian (16:40)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim C. Nasby (16:46)
• GIN index creation extremely slow ? Stefan Kaltenbrunner (17:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Bruce Momjian (17:24)
• pgsql: Change the row constructor syntax (ROW(...)) so that list Tom Lane (17:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (17:32)
• Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Josh Berkus (17:43)
• Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Alvaro Herrera (17:58)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim C. Nasby (18:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (18:16)
• Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Simon Riggs (18:17)
• Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Alvaro Herrera (18:21)
• Re: ERROR: invalid page header in block Simon Riggs (18:25)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (18:32)
• Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane (18:36)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Bruce Momjian (18:52)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (18:54)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Bruce Momjian (19:07)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (19:10)
• Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Simon Riggs (19:46)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Bruce Momjian (19:47)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the row constructor syntax (ROW(...)) Bruce Momjian (19:57)
• Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane (19:59)
• Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Simon Riggs (20:12)
• Re: Inheritance, CREATE TABLE LIKE, and partitioned tables elein (20:27)
• Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane (20:43)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change the row constructor syntax (ROW(...)) Tom Lane (20:49)
• Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Alvaro Herrera (20:54)
• Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Simon Riggs (20:59)
• Re: Inheritance, CREATE TABLE LIKE, and partitioned tables Greg Stark (21:03)
• Re: "Truncated" tuples for tuple hash tables Tom Lane (21:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Bruce Momjian (21:26)
• Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Tom Lane (21:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (21:31)
• Re: Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Alvaro Herrera (21:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take Bruce Momjian (21:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (21:43)
• Re: GIN index creation extremely slow ? Oleg Bartunov (21:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take Bruce Momjian (21:49)
• Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Simon Riggs (21:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (22:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take Bruce Momjian (23:31)

2006-06-27

• Re: [HACKERS] PQescapeIdentifier Bruce Momjian (00:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump -Ft failed on Windows XP Bruce Momjian (01:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] PQescapeIdentifier Tom Lane (01:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] PQescapeIdentifier Bruce Momjian (01:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] PQescapeIdentifier Tom Lane (01:39)
• Re: GIN index creation extremely slow ? Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] PQescapeIdentifier Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] PQescapeIdentifier Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] PQescapeIdentifier Bruce Momjian (02:49)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim C. Nasby (03:03)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (03:08)
• Re: Table clustering idea Jim C. Nasby (03:15)
• pgsql: Disallow changing/dropping default expression of a SERIAL column Bruce Momjian (03:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] PQescapeIdentifier Tom Lane (03:37)
• Re: Inheritance, CREATE TABLE LIKE, and partitioned tables Bruce Momjian (03:44)
• pgsql: Clamp last_anl_tuples to n_live_tuples, in case we vacuum a table Alvaro Herrera (03:45)
• Re: pgsql: Disallow changing/dropping default expression of a SERIAL column Tom Lane (03:46)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Disallow changing/dropping default expression Bruce Momjian (03:53)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clamp last_anl_tuples to n_live_tuples, in case we vacuum a table Alvaro Herrera (03:56)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clamp last_anl_tuples to n_live_tuples, in case we vacuum a table Tom Lane (04:12)
• Re: Table clustering idea Luke Lonergan (06:31)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Clamp last_anl_tuples to n_live_tuples, in case we vacuum a table Dave Page (07:22)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing (07:38)
• Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD (08:04)
• Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Simon Riggs (08:08)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing (08:40)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC PFC (08:42)
• Re: Table clustering idea Kim Bisgaard (08:46)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing (08:48)
• Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD (08:57)
• Turning off disk caching Dhanaraj M (10:37)
• Re: GIN index creation extremely slow ? Teodor Sigaev (11:58)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (12:48)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (13:03)
• refcount leak warnings Thomas Hallgren (13:55)
• Re: [PATCHES] Non-transactional pg_class, try 2 Tom Lane (13:58)
• Re: refcount leak warnings Martijn van Oosterhout (14:08)
• Re: refcount leak warnings Tom Lane (14:12)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Martijn van Oosterhout (14:20)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Disallow changing/dropping default expression Tom Lane (15:15)
• SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Yoshiyuki Asaba (15:23)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Tom Lane (15:30)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Martijn van Oosterhout (15:31)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Yoshiyuki Asaba (15:44)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Andrew Dunstan (15:45)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Rocco Altier (15:50)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Martijn van Oosterhout (16:13)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (16:16)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (16:18)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim C. Nasby (16:18)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (16:21)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (16:23)
• [Fwd: Re: [Pljava-dev] char with trailing space, PreparedStatement.setObject & SetString] Thomas Hallgren (16:26)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Tom Lane (16:28)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim C. Nasby (16:29)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Yoshiyuki Asaba (16:33)
• Re: Table clustering idea Jim C. Nasby (16:39)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Yoshiyuki Asaba (16:43)
• Re: Table clustering idea Csaba Nagy (16:50)
• Re: [Fwd: Re: [Pljava-dev] char with trailing space, PreparedStatement.setObject Thomas Hallgren (16:58)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Tom Lane (17:01)
• Re: Table clustering idea J. Andrew Rogers (17:13)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Magnus Hagander (17:49)
• posix_fadvise versus old kernels Tom Lane (18:22)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Greg Stark (18:28)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Disallow changing/dropping default Bruce Momjian (18:34)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian (18:37)
• Re: posix_fadvise versus old kernels Bruce Momjian (18:41)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Tom Lane (18:43)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Mark Woodward (18:49)
• Re: posix_fadvise versus old kernels Tom Lane (18:51)
• Re: SO_SNDBUF size is small on win32? Mark Woodward (19:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take Bruce Momjian (19:07)
• Re: GIN index creation extremely slow ? Stefan Kaltenbrunner (19:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take Bruce Momjian (22:14)
• pgsql: Add GUC update_process_title to control whether 'ps' display is Bruce Momjian (22:16)
• Fully replacing ps_status (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC update_process_title to control whether 'ps' display is) Tom Lane (22:36)
• Re: Fully replacing ps_status (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Bruce Momjian (22:44)
• Re: Fully replacing ps_status (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Mark Kirkwood (23:48)

2006-06-28

• Re: Fully replacing ps_status (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC update_process_title to control whether 'ps' display is) Stephen Frost (01:43)
• Re: Fully replacing ps_status (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC update_process_title to control whether 'ps' display is) Stephen Frost (01:48)
• [No subject] tju tju (03:40)
• Re: Table clustering idea Josh Berkus (03:46)
• Page format changes for 8.2? Josh Berkus (03:47)