Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2006-06-21 00:00

2006-06-21

• My new email address Bruce Momjian (00:45)
• Re: shall we have a TRACE_MEMORY mode Qingqing Zhou (02:20)
• Re: trivial DoS on char recoding Martijn van Oosterhout (06:43)
• [ppa][PATCHES] Argument handling improvements John Jawed (07:32)
• ubsubscribe Jad Madi (07:38)
• unsubscribe Jad Madi (07:39)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Dave Page (07:57)
• Re: [GENERAL] [ppa][PATCHES] Argument handling improvements Peter Eisentraut (11:21)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Tom Lane (13:30)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Dave Page (14:39)
• Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (15:02)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Tom Lane (15:07)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Andrew Dunstan (15:14)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Dave Page (15:26)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Tom Lane (15:31)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Dave Page (16:09)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (16:19)
• UTF8 server-side on Win32? Alvaro Herrera (16:41)
• Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Greg Stark (16:46)
• Re: UTF8 server-side on Win32? Tom Lane (17:09)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (17:18)
• Re: UTF8 server-side on Win32? Magnus Hagander (17:31)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Yoshiyuki Asaba (17:41)
• vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (18:10)
• Re: UPDATE crash in HEAD and 8.1 Tom Lane (18:43)
• Re: UTF8 server-side on Win32? Alvaro Herrera (19:19)
• Re: UTF8 server-side on Win32? Magnus Hagander (19:19)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Tom Lane (19:33)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Tom Lane (19:43)
• Re: [GENERAL] [ppa][PATCHES] Argument handling improvements David Fetter (20:00)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Andrew Dunstan (21:24)

2006-06-22

• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Christopher Browne (01:36)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Bruce Momjian (02:13)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Qingqing Zhou (03:01)
• Problem to "current-status information in shared memory" patch Qingqing Zhou (03:31)
• Re: Problem to "current-status information in shared memory" patch Tom Lane (03:48)
• Re: Problem to "current-status information in shared memory" patch Qingqing Zhou (04:40)
• table/index fillfactor control, try 3 ITAGAKI Takahiro (05:58)
• Re: let's meet Marc G. Fournier (06:31)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Dave Page (07:08)
• Re: checking on buildfarm member thrush Gaetano Mendola (08:54)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (10:52)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD (11:54)
• xlog viewer proposal Diogo Biazus (12:01)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Christopher Browne (12:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL David Roussel (13:03)
• Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Andrew Dunstan (13:05)
• Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?) Dave Page (13:12)
• Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe Andrew Dunstan (13:25)
• Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?) Hiroshi Saito (13:28)
• Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe Dave Page (13:39)
• Re: checking on buildfarm member thrush Tom Lane (13:45)
• Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?) Tom Lane (13:52)
• Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted Andrew Dunstan (13:58)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Alvaro Herrera (13:59)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (13:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL Craig A. James (14:03)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy (14:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL Arjen van der Meijden (14:19)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris (14:20)
• Re: Problem to "current-status information in shared memory" patch Tom Lane (14:36)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mario Weilguni (14:44)
• Re: shall we have a TRACE_MEMORY mode korry (14:47)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Relyea, Mike (14:56)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing (15:17)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane (15:37)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing (15:38)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Chris Browne (16:08)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris (16:21)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (16:33)
• Re: xlog viewer proposal Tom Lane (16:37)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (16:41)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Tom Lane (16:50)
• Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results Andrew Dunstan (16:52)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jochem van Dieten (16:53)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Lukas Smith (16:58)
• Re: xlog viewer proposal Jonah H. Harris (17:00)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Lukas Smith (17:01)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris (17:07)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC D'Arcy J.M. Cain (17:08)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Rod Taylor (17:23)
• Re: xlog viewer proposal Tom Lane (17:29)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Rod Taylor (17:30)
• Re: xlog viewer proposal Jonah H. Harris (17:36)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Todd A. Cook (17:39)
• Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results Neil Conway (17:42)
• Re: let's meet Josh Berkus (17:42)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris (17:42)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Rod Taylor (17:48)
• Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results Tom Lane (17:48)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (17:49)
• Re: let's meet Marc G. Fournier (17:50)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas (17:50)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Magnus Hagander (17:51)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Greg Stark (17:56)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (17:56)
• Re: xlog viewer proposal Diogo Biazus (17:57)
• Re: xlog viewer proposal Tom Lane (17:57)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Lukas Smith (18:03)
• Re: xlog viewer proposal Diogo Biazus (18:03)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Tom Lane (18:09)
• Re: let's meet A.M. (18:09)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Tom Lane (18:10)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Josh Berkus (18:10)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Tom Lane (18:19)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Rod Taylor (18:23)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane (18:25)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC PFC (18:28)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane (18:33)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Todd A. Cook (18:34)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Alvaro Herrera (18:37)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Josh Berkus (18:40)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Bort, Paul (18:46)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Greg Stark (18:49)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Tom Lane (18:53)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Greg Stark (18:55)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (19:00)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Todd A. Cook (19:03)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane (19:08)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Josh Berkus (19:09)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Relyea, Mike (19:14)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Tom Lane (19:15)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Tom Lane (19:23)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Jim Nasby (19:34)
• Re: xlog viewer proposal Jonah H. Harris (19:43)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC David Fetter (19:55)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Stefan Kaltenbrunner (20:00)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC PFC (20:03)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Stefan Kaltenbrunner (20:08)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Andrew Dunstan (20:12)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Andrew Dunstan (20:19)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim Nasby (20:28)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim Nasby (20:31)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (20:36)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim Nasby (20:42)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Todd A. Cook (20:48)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (20:49)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Stefan Kaltenbrunner (20:58)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Relyea, Mike (21:02)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Tom Lane (21:06)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (21:08)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane (21:22)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Alvaro Herrera (21:30)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Tom Lane (21:31)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Stefan Kaltenbrunner (21:37)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (21:41)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Larry Rosenman (22:04)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Andrew Dunstan (22:09)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Alvaro Herrera (22:18)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Andrew Dunstan (23:27)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane (23:40)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Andrew Dunstan (23:56)

2006-06-23

• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane (00:04)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane (00:19)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Andrew Dunstan (00:40)
• Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems Michael Glaesemann (00:47)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane (00:49)
• Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems Michael Glaesemann (00:53)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Thomas Lockhart (01:17)
• Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results Tom Lane (01:38)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane (01:49)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Mark Kirkwood (01:51)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Agent M (01:56)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:56)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Steve Atkins (02:08)
• Small overhead run time memory trace (Was Re: shall we have a TRACE_MEMORY mode) Qingqing Zhou (02:29)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Gavin Sherry (02:30)
• Row comparison for tables (was Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC) Tom Lane (02:30)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Christopher Browne (03:02)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris (03:20)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Gavin Sherry (03:34)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Alvaro Herrera (03:37)
• fulldisjunction - fd: Some more deformed tuple structures consolidation User Pgstudy (03:38)
• Full Disjunction Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:00)
• Re: Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Jim Nasby (05:25)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas (05:44)
• Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Bruce Momjian (06:08)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Dave Page (07:10)
• Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?) Dave Page (07:29)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Magnus Hagander (08:01)
• Shared library conflicts Thomas Hallgren (08:45)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Michael Meskes (08:52)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy (08:59)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC PFC (09:15)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy (09:25)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Luke Lonergan (09:39)
• Re: Shared library conflicts William ZHANG (10:10)
• Re: Shared library conflicts Martijn van Oosterhout (10:36)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (10:37)
• Re: Shared library conflicts Thomas Hallgren (11:01)
• Re: xlog viewer proposal Simon Riggs (11:46)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy (11:53)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (11:57)
• Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Andrew Dunstan (12:26)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD (12:41)
• Planning without reason. Tzahi Fadida (12:57)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy (12:57)
• Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward (13:00)
• Re: Planning without reason. Martijn van Oosterhout (13:14)
• Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Alvaro Herrera (13:23)