Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open source database.

pgsql-hackers since 2006-01-14 00:00

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

2006-01-14

Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (01:19)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Tom Lane (04:37)
message for constraint Jaime Casanova (04:53)
Re: message for constraint Peter Eisentraut (09:13)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Michael Glaesemann (10:28)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Lukas Smith (10:34)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Rod Taylor (15:32)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Lukas Smith (15:42)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) mark (16:06)
Re: message for constraint Jaime Casanova (16:17)
Re: PG process architecture Denis Lussier (16:40)
Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 Magnus Hagander (18:09)
Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 Tom Lane (18:44)
Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 Magnus Hagander (20:18)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Martijn van Oosterhout (20:33)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) mark (21:08)
Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (21:13)

2006-01-15

Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Greg Stark (05:08)
Coding standards? Recommendations? korry (16:14)
Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (16:16)
Re: Coding standards? Recommendations? James William Pye (16:26)
Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (17:32)
Re: pgxs/windows Magnus Hagander (17:45)
Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (18:06)
Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (18:09)
Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (18:17)
Re: Coding standards? Recommendations? korry (19:01)
Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (21:56)
Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (22:02)
Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (23:02)
ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Tom Lane (23:03)
Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (23:08)
Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (23:20)
Problem with the Planner Anjan Kumar. A. (23:35)

2006-01-16

Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (00:15)
Re: Problem with the Planner Gavin Sherry (00:20)
Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (00:40)
Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (01:00)
Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Rod Taylor (05:07)
Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index Simon Riggs (08:06)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs (08:32)
Re: Coding standards? Recommendations? Simon Riggs (08:35)
source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland (08:49)
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Thomas Hallgren (11:38)
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Kim Bisgaard (12:44)
[PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. R, Rajesh (STSD) (13:57)
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Andrew Dunstan (13:57)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Rod Taylor (14:42)
Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Martijn van Oosterhout (15:16)
Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Tom Lane (16:57)
Docs off on ILIKE indexing? Magnus Hagander (17:04)
Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Tom Lane (17:07)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane (17:36)
Re: [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. Tom Lane (17:57)
Re: Docs off on ILIKE indexing? Tom Lane (18:03)
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Thomas Hallgren (18:21)
Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Jim C. Nasby (18:25)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby (18:26)
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Neil Conway (18:31)
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Tom Lane (18:51)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Jim C. Nasby (18:52)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs (19:02)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs (19:19)
Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Bruce Momjian (19:20)
Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Joshua D. Drake (19:24)
Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Magnus Hagander (19:31)
Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Bruce Momjian (19:33)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane (19:43)
Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint Bruce Momjian (19:54)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (20:05)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Manfred Koizar (20:24)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Tom Lane (20:38)
Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint Jaime Casanova (20:44)
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Jonathan Gardner (20:45)
Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint Alvaro Herrera (20:49)
Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? Tom Lane (20:52)
Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? David Fetter (20:59)
Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint Jaime Casanova (20:59)
Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? Tom Lane (21:02)
Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? Jonah H. Harris (21:02)
Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint Tom Lane (21:04)
Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? David Fetter (21:08)
equivalence class not working? uwcssa (21:19)
Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? Tom Lane (21:21)
Re: equivalence class not working? Tom Lane (21:46)
Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Martijn van Oosterhout (21:49)
Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? David Fetter (21:50)
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Michael Glaesemann (21:51)
Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Tom Lane (22:35)
Re: source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland (23:04)
Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Bruce Momjian (23:32)
Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Marc G. Fournier (23:40)

2006-01-17

Re: equivalence class not working? uwcssa (00:03)
Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Michael Glaesemann (00:34)
Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (00:41)
Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Robert Treat (00:42)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs (00:54)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane (01:02)
FW: PGBuildfarm member firefly Branch HEAD Failed at Stage Check Larry Rosenman (03:35)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Greg Stark (05:01)
Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Tom Lane (05:15)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane (05:29)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs (07:05)
Re: [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. R, Rajesh (STSD) (07:07)
Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland (10:58)
Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland (11:21)
Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland (11:24)
Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Andrew Dunstan (12:42)
Bad estimate on LIKE matching Magnus Hagander (12:53)
Error working with Temporary Sequences in plpgsql in 8.1 (8.0 works fine) Daniel Schuchardt (14:44)
Re: Docs off on ILIKE indexing? Magnus Hagander (14:44)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane (14:52)
Re: [GENERAL] [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. Tom Lane (15:03)
Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Tom Lane (15:18)
function caching problem uwcssa (16:22)
Re: Error working with Temporary Sequences in plpgsql in 8.1 (8.0 works fine) Jaime Casanova (18:28)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs (19:17)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane (19:41)
Re: [HACKERS] Docs off on ILIKE indexing? Jim C. Nasby (20:26)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs (21:43)
Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs (23:29)

2006-01-18

debug_query_string and multiple statements Neil Conway (00:17)
test please ignore Andrew Dunstan (02:01)
Re: debug_query_string and multiple statements Tom Lane (04:17)
Re: Error working with Temporary Sequences in plpgsql in 8.1 (8.0 works fine) Michael Fuhr (04:27)
Need help in installing postgresql 8.1.2 on Windows Sarvjot Kaur (05:34)
Re: Bad estimate on LIKE matching Simon Riggs (08:08)
Re: equivalence class not working? Simon Riggs (08:46)
Re: Bad estimate on LIKE matching Magnus Hagander (09:51)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA (13:08)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA (13:11)
Re: enums Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA (13:24)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Martijn van Oosterhout (13:32)
Re: enums Andrew Dunstan (13:42)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Michael Glaesemann (13:56)
Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Martijn van Oosterhout (13:58)
Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Jonah H. Harris (14:15)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Greg Stark (14:53)
Re: Bad estimate on LIKE matching Tom Lane (15:37)
Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Martijn van Oosterhout (16:32)
Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Jonah H. Harris (17:12)
Re: debug_query_string and multiple statements Bruce Momjian (17:45)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Jim C. Nasby (19:11)
log_min_messages and debug levels Jaime Casanova (19:21)
No heap lookups on index David Scott (20:14)
Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane (20:50)
Re: Bad estimate on LIKE matching Simon Riggs (20:53)
Re: No heap lookups on index Jonah H. Harris (21:02)
Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Tom Lane (21:10)
Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Tom Lane (21:18)
Re: [HACKERS] Docs off on ILIKE indexing? Bruce Momjian (21:28)
Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Martijn van Oosterhout (21:32)
Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Martijn van Oosterhout (21:47)
Re: No heap lookups on index Simon Riggs (21:52)
Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Tom Lane (22:27)
Re: No heap lookups on index Jim C. Nasby (22:37)
Re: No heap lookups on index Jim C. Nasby (22:38)
FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Jim Nasby (22:47)
Re: [HACKERS] No heap lookups on index Glen Parker (23:11)
Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Jim C. Nasby (23:22)
Re: pgxs/windows Bruce Momjian (23:25)
Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane (23:27)
Re: [HACKERS] No heap lookups on index Glen Parker (23:56)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Josh Berkus (23:58)

2006-01-19

Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Dann Corbit (00:03)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Dann Corbit (00:06)
Re: No heap lookups on index Simon Riggs (00:15)
Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (00:17)
Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete Dutra (00:31)
Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane (00:43)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Michael Glaesemann (00:54)
Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane (01:13)
Re: No heap lookups on index Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:18)
Re: No heap lookups on index Jim C. Nasby (01:20)
Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane (01:25)
Re: No heap lookups on index Jim C. Nasby (01:27)
Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane (01:32)
Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Dann Corbit (01:34)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Michael Glaesemann (01:47)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Dann Corbit (01:51)
TODO-Item: B-tree fillfactor control ITAGAKI Takahiro (02:00)
Re: No heap lookups on index Rod Taylor (02:02)
Re: pgxs/windows Bruce Momjian (03:03)
Re: [HACKERS] No heap lookups on index Bruce Momjian (03:11)
Re: FW: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Josh Berkus (03:13)
suppress output for benchmarking uwcssa (03:35)
Re: suppress output for benchmarking Jim C. Nasby (04:11)
Re: pgxs/windows Bruce Momjian (04:48)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Tom Lane (05:06)
8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? Joshua D. Drake (06:34)
Re: Unique constraints for non-btree indexes Greg Stark (06:44)
Indexes vs. cache flushes Tom Lane (06:45)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Greg Stark (06:46)
Re: No heap lookups on index Greg Stark (06:56)
Re: 8.0.5 Bug in unique indexes? Tom Lane (07:06)
Re: No heap lookups on index Greg Stark (07:09)
Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane (07:18)
Re: No heap lookups on index Tom Lane (07:26)
Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Martijn van Oosterhout (07:27)
Re: Indexes vs. cache flushes Greg Stark (07:32)

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group