Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2006-01-10 00:00

Jan. 10, 2006

• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (00:01)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (00:41)
• Re: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working on mips[el]? Jim Buttafuoco (00:58)
• Re: cleaning up plperl warnings Andrew Dunstan (01:06)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (01:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (01:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (01:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (02:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (02:43)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (03:08)
• current_setting returns 'unset' Peter Eisentraut (10:41)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (14:47)
• Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Tom Lane (15:01)
• Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Joe Conway (15:23)
• Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Peter Eisentraut (15:25)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway (15:30)
• Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tony Caduto (15:38)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Bruce Momjian (15:51)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Dave Page (15:56)
• Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Tom Lane (16:26)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Harald Fuchs (16:52)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tom Lane (17:14)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Dave Page (17:15)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Harald Fuchs (17:45)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (20:34)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Dave Page (20:51)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tom Lane (21:12)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Josh Berkus (21:14)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (22:00)
• A question about index internals tmorelli (22:52)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] A question about index internals Jaime Casanova (22:55)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby (23:39)
• Is Optimizer smart enough? tmorelli (23:50)

Jan. 11, 2006

• Re: A question about index internals Neil Conway (01:15)
• cvs update taking a long time Michael Fuhr (02:44)
• Re: cvs update taking a long time Michael Fuhr (02:45)
• Re: cvs update taking a long time Marc G. Fournier (03:39)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tony Caduto (03:52)
• Re: TODO-item: Add sleep() function, remove from regress.c Andrew Dunstan (04:14)
• Re: Is Optimizer smart enough? Tom Lane (05:08)
• leaks in TopMemoryContext? Neil Conway (07:45)
• Re: leaks in TopMemoryContext? Tom Lane (07:58)
• Re: leaks in TopMemoryContext? Neil Conway (08:06)
• Overflow of bgwriter's request queue ITAGAKI Takahiro (10:32)
• PG process architecture Milen Kulev (14:42)
• Re: leaks in TopMemoryContext? Tom Lane (14:53)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (14:58)
• Re: PG process architecture Tom Lane (15:37)
• Re: PG process architecture Milen Kulev (15:38)
• Re: PG process architecture Joshua D. Drake (16:02)
• FW: Intermittent Stats Failiures: firefly: HEAD Larry Rosenman (16:10)
• Re: Overflow of bgwriter's request queue Tom Lane (18:15)
• Re: FW: Intermittent Stats Failiures: firefly: HEAD Tom Lane (20:28)
• sort operation leads planner to different number of rows? Robert Treat (21:31)
• Re: sort operation leads planner to different number of rows? Tom Lane (21:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (22:53)
• Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou (23:24)

Jan. 12, 2006

• Re: Checkpoint question Simon Riggs (01:03)
• Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou (01:46)
• Re: Checkpoint question Tom Lane (03:12)
• Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou (03:33)
• Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou (03:34)
• Re: Checkpoint question Simon Riggs (08:58)
• Re: Checkpoint question Simon Riggs (09:08)
• Re: Checkpoint question Tom Lane (09:15)
• Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou (09:50)
• Re: Libpq COPY optimization Alon Goldshuv (15:10)
• Re: Checkpoint question Jim C. Nasby (21:53)
• Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou (22:00)
• Contrib Schemas David Fetter (22:46)
• Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Anjan Kumar. A. (23:05)
• Re: Libpq COPY optimization Tom Lane (23:12)
• Re: Contrib Schemas Mark Kirkwood (23:16)
• Re: Contrib Schemas Andrew Dunstan (23:52)

Jan. 13, 2006

• Re: Contrib Schemas Tom Lane (00:33)
• Re: Contrib Schemas Josh Berkus (01:11)
• info is a reserved word? John DeSoi (01:14)
• Re: info is a reserved word? Michael Fuhr (01:29)
• Re: Contrib Schemas Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:03)
• Re: info is a reserved word? Tom Lane (04:21)
• Re: Contrib Schemas John DeSoi (04:34)
• Re: Overflow of bgwriter's request queue ITAGAKI Takahiro (04:47)
• Re: info is a reserved word? Michael Fuhr (04:57)
• Re: [SQL] info is a reserved word? Tom Lane (05:10)
• GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges kevin brintnall (09:37)
• Re: GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges Martijn van Oosterhout (10:20)
• C++ -> C : Module for converting the WHERE clause to the canonical form with PostgreSQL St Valentine (10:52)
• Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA (12:42)
• PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Magnus Hagander (13:38)
• Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 pmagnoli (14:12)
• Re: GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges Tom Lane (15:04)
• Re: C++ -> C : Module for converting the WHERE clause to the canonical form with PostgreSQL Tom Lane (15:24)
• Re: GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges kevin brintnall (15:52)
• Control File Bruno Almeida do Lago (16:13)
• Re: Control File Qingqing Zhou (18:06)
• Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Qingqing Zhou (18:11)
• Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Magnus Hagander (18:21)
• Re: Checkpoint question Jim C. Nasby (18:40)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (19:18)
• Re: Contrib Schemas Simon Riggs (19:26)
• Re: Contrib Schemas Josh Berkus (19:34)
• Re: Contrib Schemas John DeSoi (21:17)
• simple utility commands (src/backend/commands) Gevik babakhani (21:39)
• Re: simple utility commands (src/backend/commands) Jonah H. Harris (22:17)

Jan. 14, 2006

• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (01:19)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Tom Lane (04:37)
• message for constraint Jaime Casanova (04:53)
• Re: message for constraint Peter Eisentraut (09:13)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Michael Glaesemann (10:28)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Lukas Smith (10:34)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Rod Taylor (15:32)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Lukas Smith (15:42)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) mark (16:06)
• Re: message for constraint Jaime Casanova (16:17)
• Re: PG process architecture Denis Lussier (16:40)
• Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 Magnus Hagander (18:09)
• Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 Tom Lane (18:44)
• Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 Magnus Hagander (20:18)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Martijn van Oosterhout (20:33)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) mark (21:08)
• Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (21:13)

Jan. 15, 2006

• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Greg Stark (05:08)
• Coding standards? Recommendations? korry (16:14)
• Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (16:16)
• Re: Coding standards? Recommendations? James William Pye (16:26)
• Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (17:32)
• Re: pgxs/windows Magnus Hagander (17:45)
• Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (18:06)
• Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (18:09)
• Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (18:17)
• Re: Coding standards? Recommendations? korry (19:01)
• Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (21:56)
• Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (22:02)
• Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (23:02)
• ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Tom Lane (23:03)
• Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (23:08)
• Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (23:20)
• Problem with the Planner Anjan Kumar. A. (23:35)

Jan. 16, 2006

• Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (00:15)
• Re: Problem with the Planner Gavin Sherry (00:20)
• Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (00:40)
• Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (01:00)
• Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Rod Taylor (05:07)
• Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index Simon Riggs (08:06)
• Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs (08:32)
• Re: Coding standards? Recommendations? Simon Riggs (08:35)
• source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland (08:49)
• Re: source documentation tool doxygen Thomas Hallgren (11:38)
• Re: source documentation tool doxygen Kim Bisgaard (12:44)
• [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. R, Rajesh (STSD) (13:57)
• Re: source documentation tool doxygen Andrew Dunstan (13:57)
• Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Rod Taylor (14:42)
• Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Martijn van Oosterhout (15:16)
• Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Tom Lane (16:57)
• Docs off on ILIKE indexing? Magnus Hagander (17:04)
• Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Tom Lane (17:07)
• Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane (17:36)
• Re: [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function. Tom Lane (17:57)
• Re: Docs off on ILIKE indexing? Tom Lane (18:03)
• Re: source documentation tool doxygen Thomas Hallgren (18:21)
• Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Jim C. Nasby (18:25)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby (18:26)
• Re: source documentation tool doxygen Neil Conway (18:31)
• Re: source documentation tool doxygen Tom Lane (18:51)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Jim C. Nasby (18:52)
• Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs (19:02)
• Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Simon Riggs (19:19)
• Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Bruce Momjian (19:20)
• Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Joshua D. Drake (19:24)
• Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Magnus Hagander (19:31)
• Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Bruce Momjian (19:33)
• Re: Large Scale Aggregation (HashAgg Enhancement) Tom Lane (19:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint Bruce Momjian (19:54)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (20:05)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Manfred Koizar (20:24)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Tom Lane (20:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint Jaime Casanova (20:44)
• Re: source documentation tool doxygen Jonathan Gardner (20:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint Alvaro Herrera (20:49)
• Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? Tom Lane (20:52)
• Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? David Fetter (20:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint Jaime Casanova (20:59)
• Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? Tom Lane (21:02)
• Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? Jonah H. Harris (21:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] message for constraint Tom Lane (21:04)
• Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? David Fetter (21:08)
• equivalence class not working? uwcssa (21:19)
• Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? Tom Lane (21:21)
• Re: equivalence class not working? Tom Lane (21:46)
• Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Martijn van Oosterhout (21:49)
• Re: Anyone see a need for BTItem/HashItem? David Fetter (21:50)
• Re: source documentation tool doxygen Michael Glaesemann (21:51)
• Re: ScanKey representation for RowCompare index conditions Tom Lane (22:35)
• Re: source documentation tool doxygen Joachim Wieland (23:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Bruce Momjian (23:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Marc G. Fournier (23:40)

Jan. 17, 2006

• Re: equivalence class not working? uwcssa (00:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Michael Glaesemann (00:34)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (00:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] source documentation tool doxygen Robert Treat (00:42)