Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2006-01-08 00:00

2006-01-08

• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (00:57)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (00:58)
• ISO 8601 Intervals Larry Rosenman (03:12)
• -HEAD compile failure on OpenBSD-current Stefan Kaltenbrunner (09:54)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (13:33)
• stat /etc/localtime 38000 times on startup? Andrew Dunstan (13:52)
• Libpq COPY optimization Alon Goldshuv (14:00)
• Re: stat /etc/localtime 38000 times on startup? Magnus Hagander (14:05)
• plperl header fix and rationalisation Andrew Dunstan (14:37)
• Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working on mips[el]? Jim Buttafuoco (14:52)
• Re: plperl header fix and rationalisation Andrew Dunstan (15:52)
• Re: Stats collector performance improvement Greg Stark (16:49)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (16:58)
• Re: Libpq COPY optimization Luke Lonergan (18:25)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (18:44)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (19:00)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (19:41)
• Re: stat /etc/localtime 38000 times on startup? Tom Lane (19:47)
• Re: Libpq COPY optimization Tom Lane (19:51)
• Re: -HEAD compile failure on OpenBSD-current Tom Lane (21:34)
• cleaning up plperl warnings Andrew Dunstan (22:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Josh Berkus (22:37)

2006-01-09

• lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (01:04)
• Fw: Returned mail: see transcript for details Jim Buttafuoco (01:17)
• TODO: Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address kevin brintnall (03:10)
• Re: TODO: Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address Tom Lane (03:35)
• พนักงานธุรการยุคใหม่ Modern Office Management System Waso Training Center (04:04)
• plpgsql: check domain constraints Neil Conway (04:30)
• Re: plpgsql: check domain constraints Tom Lane (04:56)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Greg Stark (05:39)
• Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Stefan Kaltenbrunner (07:55)
• Re: plpgsql: check domain constraints Neil Conway (08:16)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (10:28)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Lukas Smith (10:52)
• Re: Incremental Backup Script Gregor Zeitlinger (11:03)
• Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Michael Glaesemann (11:45)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (12:17)
• Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Larry Rosenman (13:35)
• Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Jim Buttafuoco (13:40)
• Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Stefan Kaltenbrunner (14:03)
• Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Jim Buttafuoco (14:21)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (14:38)
• Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Ron Mayer (15:15)
• Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Ron Mayer (15:25)
• Re: Stats collector performance improvement Hannu Krosing (15:48)
• Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Kurt Roeckx (15:57)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (16:03)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (16:21)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (16:25)
• Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Jim Buttafuoco (16:46)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (17:06)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway (17:17)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (17:57)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (18:05)
• Re: [PATCHES] plpgsql: check domain constraints Tom Lane (18:20)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (18:28)
• Re: PLs and domain constraints Thomas Hallgren (19:23)
• Re: PLs and domain constraints Tom Lane (19:28)
• Re: PLs and domain constraints Neil Conway (19:29)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (19:41)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway (19:42)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (19:51)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (20:29)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (21:23)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway (22:38)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (22:49)
• Re: cleaning up plperl warnings Bruce Momjian (23:11)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (23:19)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Bruce Momjian (23:39)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (23:43)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (23:48)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Bruce Momjian (23:49)

2006-01-10

• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (00:01)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (00:41)
• Re: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working on mips[el]? Jim Buttafuoco (00:58)
• Re: cleaning up plperl warnings Andrew Dunstan (01:06)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (01:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (01:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (01:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (02:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (02:43)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (03:08)
• current_setting returns 'unset' Peter Eisentraut (10:41)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (14:47)
• Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Tom Lane (15:01)
• Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Joe Conway (15:23)
• Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Peter Eisentraut (15:25)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway (15:30)
• Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tony Caduto (15:38)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Bruce Momjian (15:51)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Dave Page (15:56)
• Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Tom Lane (16:26)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Harald Fuchs (16:52)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tom Lane (17:14)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Dave Page (17:15)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Harald Fuchs (17:45)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (20:34)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Dave Page (20:51)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tom Lane (21:12)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Josh Berkus (21:14)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (22:00)
• A question about index internals tmorelli (22:52)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] A question about index internals Jaime Casanova (22:55)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby (23:39)
• Is Optimizer smart enough? tmorelli (23:50)

2006-01-11

• Re: A question about index internals Neil Conway (01:15)
• cvs update taking a long time Michael Fuhr (02:44)
• Re: cvs update taking a long time Michael Fuhr (02:45)
• Re: cvs update taking a long time Marc G. Fournier (03:39)
• Re: Question about Postgresql time fields(possible bug) Tony Caduto (03:52)
• Re: TODO-item: Add sleep() function, remove from regress.c Andrew Dunstan (04:14)
• Re: Is Optimizer smart enough? Tom Lane (05:08)
• leaks in TopMemoryContext? Neil Conway (07:45)
• Re: leaks in TopMemoryContext? Tom Lane (07:58)
• Re: leaks in TopMemoryContext? Neil Conway (08:06)
• Overflow of bgwriter's request queue ITAGAKI Takahiro (10:32)
• PG process architecture Milen Kulev (14:42)
• Re: leaks in TopMemoryContext? Tom Lane (14:53)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (14:58)
• Re: PG process architecture Tom Lane (15:37)
• Re: PG process architecture Milen Kulev (15:38)
• Re: PG process architecture Joshua D. Drake (16:02)
• FW: Intermittent Stats Failiures: firefly: HEAD Larry Rosenman (16:10)
• Re: Overflow of bgwriter's request queue Tom Lane (18:15)
• Re: FW: Intermittent Stats Failiures: firefly: HEAD Tom Lane (20:28)
• sort operation leads planner to different number of rows? Robert Treat (21:31)
• Re: sort operation leads planner to different number of rows? Tom Lane (21:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (22:53)
• Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou (23:24)

2006-01-12

• Re: Checkpoint question Simon Riggs (01:03)
• Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou (01:46)
• Re: Checkpoint question Tom Lane (03:12)
• Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou (03:33)
• Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou (03:34)
• Re: Checkpoint question Simon Riggs (08:58)
• Re: Checkpoint question Simon Riggs (09:08)
• Re: Checkpoint question Tom Lane (09:15)
• Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou (09:50)
• Re: Libpq COPY optimization Alon Goldshuv (15:10)
• Re: Checkpoint question Jim C. Nasby (21:53)
• Re: Checkpoint question Qingqing Zhou (22:00)
• Contrib Schemas David Fetter (22:46)
• Re: Please Help: PostgreSQL Query Optimizer Anjan Kumar. A. (23:05)
• Re: Libpq COPY optimization Tom Lane (23:12)
• Re: Contrib Schemas Mark Kirkwood (23:16)
• Re: Contrib Schemas Andrew Dunstan (23:52)

2006-01-13

• Re: Contrib Schemas Tom Lane (00:33)
• Re: Contrib Schemas Josh Berkus (01:11)
• info is a reserved word? John DeSoi (01:14)
• Re: info is a reserved word? Michael Fuhr (01:29)
• Re: Contrib Schemas Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:03)
• Re: info is a reserved word? Tom Lane (04:21)
• Re: Contrib Schemas John DeSoi (04:34)
• Re: Overflow of bgwriter's request queue ITAGAKI Takahiro (04:47)
• Re: info is a reserved word? Michael Fuhr (04:57)
• Re: [SQL] info is a reserved word? Tom Lane (05:10)
• GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges kevin brintnall (09:37)
• Re: GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges Martijn van Oosterhout (10:20)
• C++ -> C : Module for converting the WHERE clause to the canonical form with PostgreSQL St Valentine (10:52)
• Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA (12:42)
• PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Magnus Hagander (13:38)
• Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 pmagnoli (14:12)
• Re: GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges Tom Lane (15:04)
• Re: C++ -> C : Module for converting the WHERE clause to the canonical form with PostgreSQL Tom Lane (15:24)
• Re: GRANT/REVOKE column-level privileges kevin brintnall (15:52)
• Control File Bruno Almeida do Lago (16:13)
• Re: Control File Qingqing Zhou (18:06)
• Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Qingqing Zhou (18:11)
• Re: PostgreSQL win32 & NT4 Magnus Hagander (18:21)
• Re: Checkpoint question Jim C. Nasby (18:40)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (19:18)
• Re: Contrib Schemas Simon Riggs (19:26)
• Re: Contrib Schemas Josh Berkus (19:34)
• Re: Contrib Schemas John DeSoi (21:17)
• simple utility commands (src/backend/commands) Gevik babakhani (21:39)
• Re: simple utility commands (src/backend/commands) Jonah H. Harris (22:17)

2006-01-14

• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (01:19)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Tom Lane (04:37)
• message for constraint Jaime Casanova (04:53)
• Re: message for constraint Peter Eisentraut (09:13)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Michael Glaesemann (10:28)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Lukas Smith (10:34)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Rod Taylor (15:32)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Lukas Smith (15:42)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) mark (16:06)
• Re: message for constraint Jaime Casanova (16:17)
• Re: PG process architecture Denis Lussier (16:40)
• Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 Magnus Hagander (18:09)
• Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 Tom Lane (18:44)
• Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 Magnus Hagander (20:18)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Martijn van Oosterhout (20:33)
• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) mark (21:08)
• Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (21:13)

2006-01-15

• Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) Greg Stark (05:08)
• Coding standards? Recommendations? korry (16:14)
• Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (16:16)
• Re: Coding standards? Recommendations? James William Pye (16:26)
• Re: pgxs/windows Tom Lane (17:32)
• Re: pgxs/windows Magnus Hagander (17:45)
• Re: pgxs/windows Andrew Dunstan (18:06)