Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2006-01-05 02:13

2006-01-05

• Re: QNX mention in tuplesort.c Tom Lane (02:13)
• Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Kris Jurka (02:30)
• Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Bruce Momjian (03:03)
• Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Andrew Dunstan (03:10)
• Re: Improving "missing FROM-clause entry" message Tom Lane (03:21)
• Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Tom Lane (04:28)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (05:33)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (05:51)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (06:23)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (06:28)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (06:31)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (08:11)
• Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Marko Kreen (10:31)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Rod Taylor (13:59)
• Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges Stephen Frost (14:04)
• Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges Michael Paesold (14:37)
• Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges Stephen Frost (14:41)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (15:02)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (15:12)
• Re: Heads up: upcoming back-branch re-releases Bruce Momjian (15:17)
• nicer error out in initdb? Andrew Dunstan (15:27)
• Re: [PATCHES] TRUNCATE, VACUUM, ANALYZE privileges Rod Taylor (15:40)
• Re: nicer error out in initdb? Tom Lane (15:54)
• Re: postmaster/postgres options assimilation plan Bruce Momjian (16:04)
• Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian (17:22)
• Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Bruce Momjian (17:27)
• Re: Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (17:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (18:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (18:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (19:06)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (19:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Josh Berkus (19:44)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby (19:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Neil Conway (21:27)
• when can we get better partitioning? hubert depesz lubaczewski (21:35)
• Re: when can we get better partitioning? Joshua D. Drake (21:53)
• Re: [Bizgres-general] WAL bypass for INSERT, UPDATE and Simon Riggs (21:56)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (22:16)
• Questions on printtup() Qingqing Zhou (22:31)
• Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (23:24)

2006-01-06

• Re: Questions on printtup() Tom Lane (00:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (01:01)
• Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Tom Lane (01:17)
• Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (01:37)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (02:09)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (02:13)
• Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (03:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruno Wolff III (04:56)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (06:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (15:20)
• could not access status of transaction 0 Stefan Kaltenbrunner (16:01)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Jim C. Nasby (16:09)
• Re: could not access status of transaction 0 Tom Lane (16:18)
• Re: could not access status of transaction 0 Stefan Kaltenbrunner (16:28)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (16:45)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (16:59)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (17:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Marko Kreen (17:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (17:13)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (17:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (17:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (17:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (17:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Marko Kreen (17:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (18:01)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Tom Lane (18:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruno Wolff III (18:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (18:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Marko Kreen (18:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Marko Kreen (19:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (20:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (20:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (20:38)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (21:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Marko Kreen (21:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (21:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Marko Kreen (22:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (22:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (23:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Josh Berkus (23:21)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Josh Berkus (23:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (23:36)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (23:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Marko Kreen (23:44)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Kenneth Marshall (23:56)

2006-01-07

• Warning on certain configuration file changes Peter Eisentraut (00:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (04:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (04:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (04:38)
• Re: Warning on certain configuration file changes Tom Lane (04:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (04:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (04:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (05:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (06:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (06:15)
• Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (07:07)
• Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Greg Stark (07:52)
• Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (08:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Marko Kreen (10:52)
• CIDR/INET improvements Joachim Wieland (13:02)
• Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Greg Stark (17:12)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (17:39)
• Re: CIDR/INET improvements Tom Lane (17:50)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (18:08)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (18:38)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (19:03)
• Re: CIDR/INET improvements Joachim Wieland (19:18)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (19:27)
• Re: Warm-up cache may have its virtue Qingqing Zhou (19:58)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (20:08)
• Test tool for sinval reset situations Tom Lane (22:03)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (22:25)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (22:35)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (23:05)

2006-01-08

• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (00:57)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (00:58)
• ISO 8601 Intervals Larry Rosenman (03:12)
• -HEAD compile failure on OpenBSD-current Stefan Kaltenbrunner (09:54)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (13:33)
• stat /etc/localtime 38000 times on startup? Andrew Dunstan (13:52)
• Libpq COPY optimization Alon Goldshuv (14:00)
• Re: stat /etc/localtime 38000 times on startup? Magnus Hagander (14:05)
• plperl header fix and rationalisation Andrew Dunstan (14:37)
• Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working on mips[el]? Jim Buttafuoco (14:52)
• Re: plperl header fix and rationalisation Andrew Dunstan (15:52)
• Re: Stats collector performance improvement Greg Stark (16:49)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (16:58)
• Re: Libpq COPY optimization Luke Lonergan (18:25)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (18:44)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (19:00)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (19:41)
• Re: stat /etc/localtime 38000 times on startup? Tom Lane (19:47)
• Re: Libpq COPY optimization Tom Lane (19:51)
• Re: -HEAD compile failure on OpenBSD-current Tom Lane (21:34)
• cleaning up plperl warnings Andrew Dunstan (22:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Josh Berkus (22:37)

2006-01-09

• lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (01:04)
• Fw: Returned mail: see transcript for details Jim Buttafuoco (01:17)
• TODO: Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address kevin brintnall (03:10)
• Re: TODO: Allow INET + INT4 to increment the host part of the address Tom Lane (03:35)
• พนักงานธุรการยุคใหม่ Modern Office Management System Waso Training Center (04:04)
• plpgsql: check domain constraints Neil Conway (04:30)
• Re: plpgsql: check domain constraints Tom Lane (04:56)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Greg Stark (05:39)
• Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Stefan Kaltenbrunner (07:55)
• Re: plpgsql: check domain constraints Neil Conway (08:16)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Simon Riggs (10:28)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Lukas Smith (10:52)
• Re: Incremental Backup Script Gregor Zeitlinger (11:03)
• Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Michael Glaesemann (11:45)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (12:17)
• Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Larry Rosenman (13:35)
• Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Jim Buttafuoco (13:40)
• Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Stefan Kaltenbrunner (14:03)
• Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Jim Buttafuoco (14:21)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (14:38)
• Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Ron Mayer (15:15)
• Re: ISO 8601 Intervals Ron Mayer (15:25)
• Re: Stats collector performance improvement Hannu Krosing (15:48)
• Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Kurt Roeckx (15:57)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (16:03)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (16:21)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (16:25)
• Re: Fw: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working Jim Buttafuoco (16:46)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (17:06)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway (17:17)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (17:57)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (18:05)
• Re: [PATCHES] plpgsql: check domain constraints Tom Lane (18:20)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Tom Lane (18:28)
• Re: PLs and domain constraints Thomas Hallgren (19:23)
• Re: PLs and domain constraints Tom Lane (19:28)
• Re: PLs and domain constraints Neil Conway (19:29)
• Re: catalog corruption bug Jeremy Drake (19:41)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway (19:42)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (19:51)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (20:29)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (21:23)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Neil Conway (22:38)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (22:49)
• Re: cleaning up plperl warnings Bruce Momjian (23:11)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (23:19)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Bruce Momjian (23:39)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (23:43)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (23:48)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Bruce Momjian (23:49)

2006-01-10

• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Andrew Dunstan (00:01)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (00:41)
• Re: Is anyone interested in getting PostgreSQL working on mips[el]? Jim Buttafuoco (00:58)
• Re: cleaning up plperl warnings Andrew Dunstan (01:06)
• Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug) Tom Lane (01:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (01:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (01:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Bruce Momjian (02:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent syntax in GRANT Tom Lane (02:43)
• Re: Improving N-Distinct estimation by ANALYZE Greg Stark (03:08)
• current_setting returns 'unset' Peter Eisentraut (10:41)
• Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful Tom Lane (14:47)
• Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Tom Lane (15:01)
• Re: current_setting returns 'unset' Joe Conway (15:23)