Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2005-12-06 00:00

2005-12-06

• Re: About varlena2 ITAGAKI Takahiro (01:00)
• Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini (01:18)
• Re: Replication on the backend Joshua D. Drake (01:35)
• Re: Replication on the backend Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:37)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (03:46)
• Bug in pg_dump -c with casts Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:58)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (04:23)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian (04:39)
• Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Bruce Momjian (04:59)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (05:08)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (05:19)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (05:29)
• Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck (05:35)
• Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Michael Fuhr (05:51)
• Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Tom Lane (06:02)
• inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:31)
• Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr (07:44)
• Re: inet to bigint? hubert depesz lubaczewski (07:48)
• Re: inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:51)
• Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr (08:05)
• Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr (08:09)
• Re: inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne (08:10)
• Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr (08:15)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar (08:52)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar (08:59)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Dave Page (11:11)
• Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini (12:03)
• Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht (13:10)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (13:11)
• Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 John D. Burger (13:35)
• Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Hannu Krosing (14:12)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (14:29)
• Re: Bug in pg_dump -c with casts Christopher Kings-Lynne (14:48)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (14:49)
• Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck (15:10)
• Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht (15:19)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (15:38)
• Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne (15:39)
• Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (15:42)
• Re: Replication on the backend Chris Browne (15:43)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne (15:44)
• Re: Replication on the backend Mario Weilguni (16:23)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Alvaro Herrera (16:48)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Tom Lane (17:03)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Bruce Momjian (17:09)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Tom Lane (17:19)
• more locale problems on Windows Andrew Dunstan (17:34)
• Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Tom Lane (18:20)
• Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Bruce Momjian (18:27)
• Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Simon Riggs (18:32)
• Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian (19:26)
• Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Tom Lane (19:27)
• Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian (19:32)
• Re: Replication on the backend Michael Meskes (19:49)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Jochem van Dieten (19:50)
• Re: Replication on the backend Rick Gigger (19:53)
• Re: Replication on the backend Rick Gigger (19:57)
• Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini (20:10)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Tom Lane (20:12)
• Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian (20:25)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing (20:26)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing (20:29)
• Re: Weird Grant/Revoke/Usage behavior Bruce Momjian (20:29)
• Slow email caught in the act Jim C. Nasby (20:36)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Tom Lane (20:38)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Tom Lane (20:41)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing (20:45)
• Re: Ideas for easier debugging of backend problems Bruce Momjian (20:47)
• Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Peter Eisentraut (20:47)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing (20:58)
• Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian (21:00)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Tom Lane (21:01)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing (21:07)
• Re: Weird Grant/Revoke/Usage behavior Tom Lane (21:11)
• more locale problems on Windows Andrew Dunstan (21:20)
• Re: more locale problems on Windows Magnus Hagander (21:33)
• Re: more locale problems on Windows Magnus Hagander (21:33)
• Re: Replication on the backend Aly S.P Dharshi (21:37)
• Re: more locale problems on Windows Andrew Dunstan (22:07)
• Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jim C. Nasby (23:01)
• Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Uwe C. Schroeder (23:21)
• Re: Slow email caught in the act Marc G. Fournier (23:21)

2005-12-07

• Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Greg Stark (00:18)
• Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Tom Lane (00:24)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking overhead) Greg Stark (00:32)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:43)
• Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:46)
• Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Michael Glaesemann (01:50)
• row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Euler Taveira de Oliveira (02:03)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Michael Fuhr (02:22)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:32)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Michael Fuhr (02:41)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:47)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Michael Fuhr (02:53)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:03)
• Re: row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Tom Lane (03:19)
• Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Gavin Sherry (03:45)
• Re: row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Michael Fuhr (03:47)
• Feature Request: Multi-octet raw Trent Shipley (03:54)
• Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck (04:19)
• Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian (04:37)
• Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Greg Stark (04:50)
• Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Tom Lane (05:06)
• Re: Replication on the backend Gregory Maxwell (05:09)
• Re: row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Mark Kirkwood (05:39)
• Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht (07:42)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing (07:43)
• Re: Replication on the backend J. Andrew Rogers (09:04)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Harald Fuchs (09:23)
• Re: Replication on the backend Markus Schiltknecht (09:23)
• Re: Replication on the backend J. Andrew Rogers (09:26)
• Re: Replication on the backend Luke Lonergan (10:46)
• Re: Feature Request: Multi-octet raw Martijn van Oosterhout (12:43)
• Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (13:50)
• About my new work at Command Prompt Inc. Devrim GUNDUZ (14:37)
• Re: Oddity with extract microseconds? Andrew Dunstan (15:37)
• Re: About my new work at Command Prompt Inc. Lamar Owen (16:53)
• Foreign key trigger timing bug? Bruce Momjian (17:33)
• Foreign key trigger timing bug? Bruce Momjian (17:46)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Jochem van Dieten (18:01)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Greg Stark (18:36)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Hannu Krosing (20:33)
• Re: Replication on the backend Andrew Sullivan (20:37)
• Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Darcy Buskermolen (20:57)
• Inherited Constraints Simon Riggs (21:24)
• Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Stephan Szabo (21:50)
• Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane (21:59)
• Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Jonah H. Harris (22:19)

2005-12-08

• Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Simon Riggs (00:14)
• Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Alvaro Herrera (00:45)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Please let us know if you will come to the PostgreSQL Anniversary Robert Treat (01:36)
• Re: row is too big: size 8916, maximum size 8136 Jan Wieck (02:04)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Please let us know if you will come Marc G. Fournier (02:39)
• HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:42)
• Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane (03:46)
• Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane (03:53)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Please let us know if you will come to the PostgreSQL Anniversary Robert Treat (03:54)
• Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Tom Lane (04:24)
• Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Jim C. Nasby (05:02)
• Re: generalizing the planner knobs Jim C. Nasby (05:35)
• Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Tom Lane (05:59)
• Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Jim C. Nasby (06:04)
• Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Jim C. Nasby (06:16)
• Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Hannu Krosing (06:57)
• Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Jim C. Nasby (07:08)
• Re: [GENERAL] 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jim C. Nasby (07:13)
• Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Jim C. Nasby (07:34)
• Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Junji TERAMOTO (08:51)
• Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs (09:14)
• Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Simon Riggs (09:38)
• Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Simon Riggs (09:57)
• Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Hannu Krosing (09:58)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing Csaba Nagy (10:05)
• implement prepared queries in plperl Dmitry Karasik (10:33)
• Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? pmagnoli (11:10)
• Re: [PATCHES] Inherited Constraints Simon Riggs (11:10)
• forced to restart postgresql service yesterday Merlin Moncure (14:06)
• Re: implement prepared queries in plperl Andrew Dunstan (14:41)
• Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane (14:44)
• Re: forced to restart postgresql service yesterday Tom Lane (14:50)
• Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Bruce Momjian (15:03)
• Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (15:05)
• Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Csaba Nagy (15:23)
• Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane (15:26)
• Re: implement prepared queries in plperl Dmitry Karasik (15:29)
• Re: int to inet conversion [or Re: inet to bigint?] Kai (15:36)
• Re: BUG #1467: fe_connect doesn't handle EINTR right Bruce Momjian (15:53)
• Re: implement prepared queries in plperl Andrew Dunstan (16:04)
• Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Darcy Buskermolen (16:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] About my new work at Command Prompt Inc. Jan Wieck (16:39)
• Re: Foreign key trigger timing bug? Jan Wieck (16:49)
• Re: forced to restart postgresql service yesterday Merlin Moncure (17:05)
• Backslashes in string literals Kevin Grittner (17:13)
• Re: [PATCHES] Inherited Constraints Hannu Krosing (17:15)
• Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Greg Stark (17:27)
• Re: generalizing the planner knobs Jaime Casanova (17:35)
• Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Tom Lane (17:36)
• Re: [PATCHES] Inherited Constraints Rod Taylor (17:49)
• bgwriter leaks resources after errors Tom Lane (17:50)
• Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane (18:07)
• Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock Simon Riggs (18:09)
• Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs (18:25)
• Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini (18:28)
• Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Jim C. Nasby (18:42)
• Improving free space usage (was: Reducing relation locking overhead) Jim C. Nasby (18:57)
• Re: Vertical Partitioning with TOAST Jan Wieck (19:04)
• Re: Replication on the backend Andrew Dunstan (19:04)
• Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Jim C. Nasby (19:05)
• Re: bgwriter leaks resources after errors Qingqing Zhou (19:10)
• Re: generalizing the planner knobs Jim C. Nasby (19:18)
• Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck (19:18)
• Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Jan Wieck (19:23)
• Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Jonah H. Harris (19:32)
• Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Dann Corbit (19:33)
• Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Jan Wieck (19:35)
• Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (19:53)
• Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication? Jonah H. Harris (20:19)
• Re: Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducing relation locking Ron Mayer (20:34)
• Re: generic builtin functions Tom Lane (21:19)
• Re: Improving free space usage (was: Reducing relation locking Hannu Krosing (22:00)