Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open source database.

pgsql-hackers since 2005-12-03 00:47

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

2005-12-03

Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane (00:47)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway (00:51)
Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 Charles F. I. Savage (00:54)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jim C. Nasby (02:22)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jim C. Nasby (02:28)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane (03:08)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway (03:33)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (04:25)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Philip Warner (06:10)
Re: Spam 508 Simon Riggs (08:56)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs (09:10)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Simon Riggs (09:21)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Philip Warner (11:06)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Peter Eisentraut (11:11)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Martijn van Oosterhout (11:17)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Hans-Juergen Schoenig (12:34)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (13:01)
Striping CLOG and Subtrans Simon Riggs (13:14)
snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar (13:18)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Robert Treat (13:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Peter Eisentraut (14:48)
Strange left join problems in 8.1 Mario Weilguni (14:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (14:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Michael Paesold (15:14)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark (15:15)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark (15:23)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (15:27)
unsubscribe Esha Palta (15:47)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown (15:47)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian (15:54)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Neil Conway (15:56)
Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Kevin Brown (16:10)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows Bruce Momjian (16:16)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (16:29)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (16:30)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Tom Lane (16:43)
Re: Striping CLOG and Subtrans Tom Lane (16:49)
Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1 Tom Lane (16:53)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (16:57)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows Tom Lane (17:00)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown (17:09)
Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1 Mario Weilguni (17:18)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Bruce Momjian (17:19)
Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1 Tom Lane (17:26)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (17:53)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (18:07)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark (19:01)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar (19:26)
Re: Striping CLOG and Subtrans Simon Riggs (19:38)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs (19:39)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Alvaro Herrera (20:16)
SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (21:23)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Bruno Wolff III (21:30)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Tino Wildenhain (21:37)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Jochem van Dieten (21:45)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Andrew Dunstan (21:47)
Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 Charlie Savage (21:58)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Josh Berkus (21:59)
Re: Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 Qingqing Zhou (22:55)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Peter Eisentraut (23:06)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Uwe C. Schroeder (23:07)
Re: Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 Charlie Savage (23:24)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs (23:32)

2005-12-04

Re: [PERFORM] Network permormance under windows (fwd) Qingqing Zhou (00:40)
Re: A couple of proposed pgbench changes Tatsuo Ishii (01:11)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (01:14)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (02:17)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (02:38)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Qingqing Zhou (03:38)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Bruce Momjian (03:45)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (03:51)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (03:52)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Tom Lane (04:05)
Re: I can't get row type from tuple (SPI) Bruce Momjian (04:14)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Bruce Momjian (04:33)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Tom Lane (04:38)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Jan Wieck (06:02)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (07:52)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (07:53)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (07:57)
Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1 Mario Weilguni (08:58)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs (13:57)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Alvaro Herrera (15:49)
MIN() performance regression 8.0 -> 8.1 Paul Lindner (15:57)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (16:09)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Paul Lindner (16:25)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Tom Lane (16:34)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Paul Lindner (16:40)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Tom Lane (16:52)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown (17:13)
Upcoming PG re-releases Gregory Maxwell (17:19)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (18:32)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Pollard, Mike (18:47)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (18:53)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Martijn van Oosterhout (18:55)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (18:57)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Andrew Dunstan (18:58)
Er ... does port/snprintf.c actually work? Tom Lane (19:17)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown (20:15)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Bruce Momjian (21:14)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too Andrew Dunstan (21:28)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Bruce Momjian (21:29)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Andrew Dunstan (21:49)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian (22:09)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (22:10)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Tino Wildenhain (22:25)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (23:08)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Andrew Dunstan (23:22)

2005-12-05

Re: SERIAL type feature request Jan Wieck (00:50)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Michael Glaesemann (00:53)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark (00:55)
Re: 8.1, OID`s and plpgsql Greg Sabino Mullane (01:19)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark (01:27)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:57)
port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype) Tom Lane (02:50)
Re: MIN() performance regression 8.0 -> 8.1 Tom Lane (03:05)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (03:07)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane (03:17)
Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype) Bruce Momjian (03:18)
Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype) Tom Lane (03:27)
Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype) Tom Lane (04:16)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Gavin Sherry (04:43)
Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype) Bruce Momjian (05:10)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian (05:21)
Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype) Tom Lane (05:25)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown (06:40)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark (06:53)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (07:02)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs (08:28)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs (08:37)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs (08:44)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Hans-Juergen Schoenig (09:36)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits John D. Burger (13:24)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead mark (13:38)
Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducingrelation locking overhead) Hannu Krosing (14:03)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (14:19)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (14:35)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (14:47)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Alvaro Herrera (15:08)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (15:44)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (15:56)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown (16:28)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (16:33)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (16:44)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian (16:46)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark (17:12)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Csaba Nagy (17:31)
Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Bruce Momjian (17:38)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (17:53)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (18:03)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Jan Wieck (18:09)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (18:18)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (18:19)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Tom Lane (18:31)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (19:02)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Gregory Maxwell (19:07)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Dave Page (19:15)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (19:32)
Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini (19:38)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (19:59)
Re: Shared locking in slru.c Tom Lane (20:32)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (20:37)
*printf and zero size Bruce Momjian (20:44)
Re: *printf and zero size Tom Lane (21:05)
Re: *printf and zero size Bruce Momjian (21:35)
Re: *printf and zero size Tom Lane (21:40)
About varlena2 Qingqing Zhou (21:44)
Re: *printf and zero size Kurt Roeckx (21:45)
Re: *printf and zero size Tom Lane (22:03)
Re: About varlena2 Tom Lane (22:10)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (22:30)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (22:42)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (22:42)
Re: Replication on the backend Chris Browne (23:26)

2005-12-06

Re: About varlena2 ITAGAKI Takahiro (01:00)
Re: Replication on the backend Gustavo Tonini (01:18)
Re: Replication on the backend Joshua D. Drake (01:35)
Re: Replication on the backend Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:37)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (03:46)
Bug in pg_dump -c with casts Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:58)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (04:23)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Bruce Momjian (04:39)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Bruce Momjian (04:59)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (05:08)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Andrew Dunstan (05:19)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Tom Lane (05:29)
Re: Replication on the backend Jan Wieck (05:35)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Michael Fuhr (05:51)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 Tom Lane (06:02)
inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:31)
Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr (07:44)
Re: inet to bigint? hubert depesz lubaczewski (07:48)
Re: inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:51)
Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr (08:05)
Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr (08:09)
Re: inet to bigint? Christopher Kings-Lynne (08:10)
Re: inet to bigint? Michael Fuhr (08:15)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar (08:52)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar (08:59)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working Dave Page (11:11)

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group