Skip site navigation
(1)
Skip section navigation
(2)
Search
Peripheral Links
Text Size:
Normal
/
Large
Donate
Contact
Home
About
Download
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Your account
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
User lists
Developer lists
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-hackers
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-www
Regional lists
Associations
User groups
Project lists
Inactive lists
IRC
Featured Users
International Sites
Propaganda
Resources
Weekly News
pgsql-hackers since 2005-12-03 00:47
Search archives
(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search
Prev
|
Next
Jump to day:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
2005-12-03
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database
Tom Lane (00:47)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production
Joe Conway (00:51)
Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005
Charles F. I. Savage (00:54)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql
Jim C. Nasby (02:22)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql
Jim C. Nasby (02:28)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database
Tom Lane (03:08)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production
Joe Conway (03:33)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Bruce Momjian (04:25)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1
Philip Warner (06:10)
Re: Spam 508
Simon Riggs (08:56)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Simon Riggs (09:10)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1
Simon Riggs (09:21)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1
Philip Warner (11:06)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Peter Eisentraut (11:11)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits
Martijn van Oosterhout (11:17)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Hans-Juergen Schoenig (12:34)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Bruce Momjian (13:01)
Striping CLOG and Subtrans
Simon Riggs (13:14)
snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1
Nicolai Tufar (13:18)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Robert Treat (13:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Peter Eisentraut (14:48)
Strange left join problems in 8.1
Mario Weilguni (14:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Bruce Momjian (14:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Michael Paesold (15:14)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Greg Stark (15:15)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Greg Stark (15:23)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Bruce Momjian (15:27)
unsubscribe
Esha Palta (15:47)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Kevin Brown (15:47)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases
Bruce Momjian (15:54)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases
Neil Conway (15:56)
Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases
Kevin Brown (16:10)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows
Bruce Momjian (16:16)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Tom Lane (16:29)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Tom Lane (16:30)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits
Tom Lane (16:43)
Re: Striping CLOG and Subtrans
Tom Lane (16:49)
Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1
Tom Lane (16:53)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Tom Lane (16:57)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows
Tom Lane (17:00)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Kevin Brown (17:09)
Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1
Mario Weilguni (17:18)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under
Bruce Momjian (17:19)
Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1
Tom Lane (17:26)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Tom Lane (17:53)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Tom Lane (18:07)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Greg Stark (19:01)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1
Nicolai Tufar (19:26)
Re: Striping CLOG and Subtrans
Simon Riggs (19:38)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Simon Riggs (19:39)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Alvaro Herrera (20:16)
SERIAL type feature request
Zoltan Boszormenyi (21:23)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits
Bruno Wolff III (21:30)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Tino Wildenhain (21:37)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Jochem van Dieten (21:45)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Andrew Dunstan (21:47)
Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005
Charlie Savage (21:58)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Josh Berkus (21:59)
Re: Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005
Qingqing Zhou (22:55)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Peter Eisentraut (23:06)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql
Uwe C. Schroeder (23:07)
Re: Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005
Charlie Savage (23:24)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Simon Riggs (23:32)
2005-12-04
Re: [PERFORM] Network permormance under windows (fwd)
Qingqing Zhou (00:40)
Re: A couple of proposed pgbench changes
Tatsuo Ishii (01:11)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Bruce Momjian (01:14)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Tom Lane (02:17)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Bruce Momjian (02:38)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Qingqing Zhou (03:38)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under
Bruce Momjian (03:45)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Tom Lane (03:51)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Bruce Momjian (03:52)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under
Tom Lane (04:05)
Re: I can't get row type from tuple (SPI)
Bruce Momjian (04:14)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too
Bruce Momjian (04:33)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too
Tom Lane (04:38)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Jan Wieck (06:02)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Zoltan Boszormenyi (07:52)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Zoltan Boszormenyi (07:53)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Zoltan Boszormenyi (07:57)
Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1
Mario Weilguni (08:58)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Simon Riggs (13:57)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Alvaro Herrera (15:49)
MIN() performance regression 8.0 -> 8.1
Paul Lindner (15:57)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (16:09)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases
Paul Lindner (16:25)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases
Tom Lane (16:34)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases
Paul Lindner (16:40)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases
Tom Lane (16:52)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Kevin Brown (17:13)
Upcoming PG re-releases
Gregory Maxwell (17:19)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Tom Lane (18:32)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Pollard, Mike (18:47)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (18:53)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases
Martijn van Oosterhout (18:55)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Tom Lane (18:57)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too
Andrew Dunstan (18:58)
Er ... does port/snprintf.c actually work?
Tom Lane (19:17)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Kevin Brown (20:15)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too
Bruce Momjian (21:14)
Re: pg_restore [archiver] file offset in dump file is too
Andrew Dunstan (21:28)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Bruce Momjian (21:29)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Andrew Dunstan (21:49)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Bruce Momjian (22:09)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Zoltan Boszormenyi (22:10)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Tino Wildenhain (22:25)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (23:08)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Andrew Dunstan (23:22)
2005-12-05
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Jan Wieck (00:50)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Michael Glaesemann (00:53)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Greg Stark (00:55)
Re: 8.1, OID`s and plpgsql
Greg Sabino Mullane (01:19)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Greg Stark (01:27)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:57)
port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)
Tom Lane (02:50)
Re: MIN() performance regression 8.0 -> 8.1
Tom Lane (03:05)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Tom Lane (03:07)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Tom Lane (03:17)
Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)
Bruce Momjian (03:18)
Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)
Tom Lane (03:27)
Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)
Tom Lane (04:16)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases
Gavin Sherry (04:43)
Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)
Bruce Momjian (05:10)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Bruce Momjian (05:21)
Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)
Tom Lane (05:25)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Kevin Brown (06:40)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Greg Stark (06:53)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (07:02)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Simon Riggs (08:28)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Simon Riggs (08:37)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Simon Riggs (08:44)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Hans-Juergen Schoenig (09:36)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits
John D. Burger (13:24)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
mark (13:38)
Concurrent CREATE INDEX, try 2 (was Re: Reducingrelation locking overhead)
Hannu Krosing (14:03)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (14:19)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Tom Lane (14:35)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Tom Lane (14:47)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Alvaro Herrera (15:08)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (15:44)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Tom Lane (15:56)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead
Kevin Brown (16:28)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (16:33)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Tom Lane (16:44)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Bruce Momjian (16:46)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Greg Stark (17:12)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs
Csaba Nagy (17:31)
Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits
Bruce Momjian (17:38)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (17:53)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Zoltan Boszormenyi (18:03)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Jan Wieck (18:09)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Tom Lane (18:18)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Tom Lane (18:19)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits
Tom Lane (18:31)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (19:02)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits
Gregory Maxwell (19:07)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Dave Page (19:15)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Tom Lane (19:32)
Replication on the backend
Gustavo Tonini (19:38)
Re: SERIAL type feature request
Zoltan Boszormenyi (19:59)
Re: Shared locking in slru.c
Tom Lane (20:32)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Tom Lane (20:37)
*printf and zero size
Bruce Momjian (20:44)
Re: *printf and zero size
Tom Lane (21:05)
Re: *printf and zero size
Bruce Momjian (21:35)
Re: *printf and zero size
Tom Lane (21:40)
About varlena2
Qingqing Zhou (21:44)
Re: *printf and zero size
Kurt Roeckx (21:45)
Re: *printf and zero size
Tom Lane (22:03)
Re: About varlena2
Tom Lane (22:10)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (22:30)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (22:42)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Tom Lane (22:42)
Re: Replication on the backend
Chris Browne (23:26)
2005-12-06
Re: About varlena2
ITAGAKI Takahiro (01:00)
Re: Replication on the backend
Gustavo Tonini (01:18)
Re: Replication on the backend
Joshua D. Drake (01:35)
Re: Replication on the backend
Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:37)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Tom Lane (03:46)
Bug in pg_dump -c with casts
Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:58)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (04:23)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Bruce Momjian (04:39)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508
Bruce Momjian (04:59)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Tom Lane (05:08)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Andrew Dunstan (05:19)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Tom Lane (05:29)
Re: Replication on the backend
Jan Wieck (05:35)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508
Michael Fuhr (05:51)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508
Tom Lane (06:02)
inet to bigint?
Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:31)
Re: inet to bigint?
Michael Fuhr (07:44)
Re: inet to bigint?
hubert depesz lubaczewski (07:48)
Re: inet to bigint?
Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:51)
Re: inet to bigint?
Michael Fuhr (08:05)
Re: inet to bigint?
Michael Fuhr (08:09)
Re: inet to bigint?
Christopher Kings-Lynne (08:10)
Re: inet to bigint?
Michael Fuhr (08:15)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1
Nicolai Tufar (08:52)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1
Nicolai Tufar (08:59)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Dave Page (11:11)
Prev
|
Next
Jump to day:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Privacy Policy
|
About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group