Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open source database.

pgsql-hackers since 2005-12-02 00:00

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

2005-12-02

Re: Fork-based version of pgbench Tom Lane (00:23)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is Tom Lane (00:37)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Tom Lane (00:42)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set to zero. Tom Lane (00:44)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Gregory Maxwell (02:01)
Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (02:37)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (02:44)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:45)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add comments about why errno is set Bruce Momjian (02:49)
Re: Windows installation notes Greg Sabino Mullane (02:56)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Stephen Frost (03:03)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (03:14)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Uwe C. Schroeder (03:18)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Pollard, Mike (03:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (03:27)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Neil Conway (03:37)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (03:43)
Re: Please let us know if you will come to the PostgreSQL Anniversary Greg Sabino Mullane (03:45)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Tom Lane (03:56)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (03:58)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (04:03)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (04:34)
Weird Grant/Revoke/Usage behavior Joshua D. Drake (05:04)
Additional Grant/revoke problem Joshua D. Drake (05:19)
Re: Fork-based version of pgbench Greg Stark (06:40)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark (06:44)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Trent Shipley (07:06)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark (07:09)
Re: Fork-based version of pgbench Tom Lane (07:11)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (07:14)
Buildfarm: Bear, Branch 2? Michael Glaesemann (07:33)
Re: slow IN() clause for many cases Simon Riggs (08:18)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Peter Eisentraut (08:28)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Simon Riggs (08:57)
Re: Using multi-row technique with COPY Simon Riggs (09:39)
Re: slow IN() clause for many cases Martijn van Oosterhout (09:48)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Csaba Nagy (10:07)
Re: Shared locking in slru.c Manfred Koizar (10:09)
Graphics in postgress using GTK Anuj Tripathi (10:45)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Martijn van Oosterhout (10:53)
Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK Martijn van Oosterhout (11:06)
Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK Richard Huxton (11:10)
Re: Buildfarm: Bear, Branch 2? Andrew Dunstan (11:54)
Re: Buildfarm: Bear, Branch 2? Michael Glaesemann (11:56)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Pollard, Mike (12:57)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (14:14)
Re: Shared locking in slru.c Tom Lane (14:18)
[No subject] luckyghio@katamail.com (14:41)
postgres questions (semi-joins, algebraic space) luckyghio@katamail.com (14:44)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs (14:53)
Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Philip Warner (14:55)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Andrew Dunstan (15:02)
Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK Cristian Prieto (15:12)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Rod Taylor (15:20)
Re: Graphics in postgress using GTK Jaime Casanova (15:30)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Tom Lane (15:42)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (16:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Chris Browne (17:14)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (17:17)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jaime Casanova (17:25)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (17:28)
Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Bruce Momjian (17:39)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (17:43)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (18:03)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (18:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (18:23)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (18:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (18:38)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (18:39)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (18:42)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Tom Lane (18:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (18:52)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (18:54)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Joshua D. Drake (19:01)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (19:09)
Re: What`s wrong with the lists? Greg Sabino Mullane (19:37)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (19:53)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Alvaro Herrera (20:01)
Re: What`s wrong with the lists? Alvaro Herrera (20:05)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (20:06)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Alvaro Herrera (20:12)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (20:12)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (20:14)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (20:15)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark (20:25)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Alvaro Herrera (20:26)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Joshua D. Drake (20:27)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Tom Lane (20:37)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (20:44)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Greg Stark (20:49)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Rod Taylor (20:51)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (20:55)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (20:59)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Simon Riggs (21:01)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Gregory Maxwell (21:01)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (21:05)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (21:10)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (21:19)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Gregory Maxwell (21:23)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (21:30)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Alvaro Herrera (22:04)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Michael Fuhr (22:04)
Re: Please let us know if you will come to the PostgreSQL Anniversary Andrew Sullivan (22:07)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (22:11)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (22:20)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (22:23)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (22:26)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (22:29)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs (22:34)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (22:38)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (22:39)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Jochem van Dieten (22:41)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (22:41)
Re: Optional postgres database not so optional in 8.1 Andrew Dunstan (22:45)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (22:45)
Spam 508 Simon Riggs (22:47)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (22:49)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Simon Riggs (23:01)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Trent Shipley (23:05)
Re: Spam 508 Marc G. Fournier (23:19)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (23:32)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (23:38)
strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Joe Conway (23:44)
Re: Spam 508 Tom Lane (23:44)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jim C. Nasby (23:46)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane (23:53)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Tom Lane (23:58)
Re: Spam 508 Jan Wieck (23:58)

2005-12-03

Re: Spam 508 Marc G. Fournier (00:03)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway (00:06)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane (00:11)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway (00:17)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane (00:20)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Philip Warner (00:35)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Tom Lane (00:37)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway (00:40)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Tom Lane (00:43)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane (00:47)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway (00:51)
Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 Charles F. I. Savage (00:54)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jim C. Nasby (02:22)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Jim C. Nasby (02:28)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production database Tom Lane (03:08)
Re: strange behavior (corruption?) of large production Joe Conway (03:33)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Bruce Momjian (04:25)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Philip Warner (06:10)
Re: Spam 508 Simon Riggs (08:56)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs (09:10)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Simon Riggs (09:21)
Re: Optimizer oddness, possibly compounded in 8.1 Philip Warner (11:06)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Peter Eisentraut (11:11)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Martijn van Oosterhout (11:17)
Re: generalizing the planner knobs Hans-Juergen Schoenig (12:34)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (13:01)
Striping CLOG and Subtrans Simon Riggs (13:14)
snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar (13:18)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Robert Treat (13:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Peter Eisentraut (14:48)
Strange left join problems in 8.1 Mario Weilguni (14:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (14:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Michael Paesold (15:14)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark (15:15)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark (15:23)
Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? Bruce Momjian (15:27)
unsubscribe Esha Palta (15:47)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown (15:47)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Bruce Momjian (15:54)
Re: Upcoming PG re-releases Neil Conway (15:56)
Re: [pgsql-www] Upcoming PG re-releases Kevin Brown (16:10)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows Bruce Momjian (16:16)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (16:29)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (16:30)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Tom Lane (16:43)
Re: Striping CLOG and Subtrans Tom Lane (16:49)
Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1 Tom Lane (16:53)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (16:57)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows Tom Lane (17:00)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Kevin Brown (17:09)
Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1 Mario Weilguni (17:18)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Bruce Momjian (17:19)
Re: Strange left join problems in 8.1 Tom Lane (17:26)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Tom Lane (17:53)
Re: Numeric 508 datatype Tom Lane (18:07)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Greg Stark (19:01)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1 Nicolai Tufar (19:26)
Re: Striping CLOG and Subtrans Simon Riggs (19:38)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs (19:39)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Alvaro Herrera (20:16)
SERIAL type feature request Zoltan Boszormenyi (21:23)
Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508 digits Bruno Wolff III (21:30)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Tino Wildenhain (21:37)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Jochem van Dieten (21:45)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Andrew Dunstan (21:47)
Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 Charlie Savage (21:58)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Josh Berkus (21:59)
Re: Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 Qingqing Zhou (22:55)
Re: SERIAL type feature request Peter Eisentraut (23:06)
Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql Uwe C. Schroeder (23:07)
Re: Building Windows Server Extensions Using VC++ 2005 Charlie Savage (23:24)
Re: Reducing relation locking overhead Simon Riggs (23:32)

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group