Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2005-04-30 00:00

2005-04-30

• Re: performance of bitmap scans in nested loop joins Sergey E. Koposov (00:01)
• SPI bug. Tzahi Fadida (01:25)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Marc G. Fournier (01:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (03:42)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Matthew T. O'Connor (04:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Tom Lane (04:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Kris Jurka (05:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (06:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby (06:18)
• Python James William Pye (06:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (06:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby (06:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby (06:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (06:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Nicolai Petri (lists) (08:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Kris Jurka (10:05)
• Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream Neil Conway (11:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Rob Butler (12:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (13:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (13:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (17:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Christopher Browne (17:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Christopher Browne (17:34)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Christopher Browne (18:00)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Christopher Browne (18:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Robert Treat (19:14)
• Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful Tom Lane (20:17)
• pg_locks needs a facelift Tom Lane (21:12)
• Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful elein (21:21)
• Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful Tom Lane (21:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement David Fetter (21:40)
• Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered James William Pye (23:26)
• Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful elein (23:35)
• OLAP and PG and deja-vu Mischa Sandberg (23:41)

2005-05-01

• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Robert Treat (01:34)
• pl/Python James William Pye (01:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Robert Treat (01:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Robert Treat (01:59)
• Re: SPI bug. Neil Conway (06:00)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Sander Steffann (10:00)
• Re: SPI bug. Neil Conway (11:54)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (12:09)
• Re: SPI bug. Andrew - Supernews (12:40)
• Re: SPI bug. Thomas Hallgren (13:49)
• Re: SPI bug. Neil Conway (14:02)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Alvaro Herrera (14:25)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Peter Eisentraut (14:44)
• Re: SPI bug. Thomas Hallgren (14:50)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dennis Bjorklund (14:56)
• Re: SPI bug. Tom Lane (15:29)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane (15:37)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (16:34)
• Network write errors (was: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1) Andrew - Supernews (16:39)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (16:57)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dennis Bjorklund (17:35)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (18:17)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Christopher Browne (19:03)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Hannu Krosing (19:23)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Bruno Wolff III (19:35)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (20:30)
• custom guc vars Andrew Dunstan (22:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier (23:58)

2005-05-02

• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier (00:01)
• Re: SPI bug. Neil Conway (00:40)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Christopher Browne (01:09)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:48)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Neil Conway (02:05)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett (03:58)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Jaime Casanova (04:08)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Neil Conway (04:14)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane (04:25)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane (04:41)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Neil Conway (05:05)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett (05:20)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Russell Smith (05:22)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane (05:35)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane (05:56)
• Re: SPI bug. Thomas Hallgren (06:00)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane (06:01)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dennis Bjorklund (06:06)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Neil Conway (06:07)
• Re: SPI bug. Thomas Hallgren (06:52)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett (06:53)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett (06:56)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Peter Eisentraut (08:11)
• Re: custom guc vars Brent Verner (08:15)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett (08:49)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (08:52)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (08:58)
• Using LDAP for authorization Magnus Hagander (09:12)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (09:12)
• Re: custom guc vars Thomas Hallgren (09:13)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (09:36)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (09:52)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (10:01)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Hannu Krosing (10:59)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (11:23)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (11:25)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Alvar Freude (11:32)
• Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several Hannu Krosing (11:54)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (13:24)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane (14:33)
• Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Tom Lane (14:38)
• Re: Using LDAP for authorization Stephen Frost (14:41)
• Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Merlin Moncure (14:57)
• Re: SPI bug. Tom Lane (14:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Dave Held (15:00)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane (15:07)
• Re: SPI bug. Thomas Hallgren (15:37)
• Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Tom Lane (15:37)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Heikki Linnakangas (15:47)
• Citation for "Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?" Gurmeet Manku (16:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Josh Berkus (16:48)
• Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several Hannu Krosing (16:50)
• ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only tables, select fromindexes only.) Hannu Krosing (16:53)
• Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Merlin Moncure (17:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (17:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (17:17)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (17:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier (17:22)
• Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Alvaro Herrera (17:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (17:28)
• Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Tom Lane (17:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (17:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Dave Held (17:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (17:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (17:47)
• Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Merlin Moncure (17:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Dave Held (17:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (17:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (17:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (17:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier (18:12)
• Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Merlin Moncure (18:12)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (18:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (18:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Josh Berkus (18:20)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Andrew - Supernews (18:26)
• Re: Cleaning up unreferenced table files Bruce Momjian (18:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased Marc G. Fournier (18:35)
• Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Tom Lane (18:37)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier (18:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased Joshua D. Drake (18:40)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (18:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Dave Held (18:43)
• PostgreSQL Guru needed: $70K - $80K year!! PeterS (18:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Josh Berkus (18:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Tom Lane (18:50)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier (18:52)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (18:54)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (19:00)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier (19:04)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (19:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Andrew Dunstan (19:06)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Tom Lane (19:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Josh Berkus (19:13)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier (19:14)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (19:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Chris Travers (19:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Bruce Momjian (19:22)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (19:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Dann Corbit (19:25)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (19:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Robert Treat (19:28)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Rob Butler (19:29)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier (19:31)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (19:51)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Andrew - Supernews (19:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Bruce Momjian (19:57)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier (20:00)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Bruno Wolff III (20:05)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (20:05)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Bruce Momjian (20:08)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (20:12)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier (20:14)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Tom Lane (20:15)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane (20:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby (20:20)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan (20:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Bruce Momjian (20:33)
• Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Merlin Moncure (20:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement Alvaro Herrera (20:36)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 adnandursun (20:38)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Ron Mayer (20:39)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake (20:40)
• Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Jim C. Nasby (20:42)
• Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Alvaro Herrera (20:43)
• Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Jim C. Nasby (20:47)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan (20:53)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Alvar Freude (20:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Rosser Schwarz (20:58)
• Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only.) Jim C. Nasby (20:59)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Hannu Krosing (21:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Rosser Schwarz (21:01)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Jim C. Nasby (21:02)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Jim C. Nasby (21:05)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan (21:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Dave Held (21:32)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett (21:35)
• Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett (21:51)