Skip site navigation
(1)
Skip section navigation
(2)
Search
Peripheral Links
Text Size:
Normal
/
Large
Donate
Contact
Home
About
Download
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Your account
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
User lists
Developer lists
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-hackers
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-www
Regional lists
Associations
User groups
Project lists
Inactive lists
IRC
Featured Users
International Sites
Propaganda
Resources
Weekly News
pgsql-hackers since 2005-04-27 00:00
Search archives
(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search
Prev
|
Next
2005-04-27
Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql
John DeSoi (00:02)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules
Jan Wieck (00:02)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Rod Taylor (00:16)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters
Brent Verner (00:31)
Disable large objects GUC
Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:49)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules
David Wheeler (02:00)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters
Tom Lane (03:00)
Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop?
Tom Lane (03:22)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Tom Lane (04:14)
Re: Disable large objects GUC
Tom Lane (04:19)
Re: Disable large objects GUC
Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:29)
Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Mischa Sandberg (05:38)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Greg Stark (05:59)
Re: bitmapscan test, no success, bs is not faster
Pavel Stehule (06:27)
Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Simon Riggs (07:45)
Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql
Greg Sabino Mullane (12:02)
Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql
Robert Treat (12:32)
Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes
Simon Riggs (13:13)
Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Andrew Dunstan (13:43)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters
Brent Verner (14:13)
PITR and postmaster.pid
Rod Taylor (14:34)
Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Dave Held (14:35)
Behavior of shared/exclusive row locks
Tom Lane (15:19)
Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Josh Berkus (15:25)
Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Dave Held (15:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql
Bruce Momjian (16:39)
Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql
Tom Lane (17:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Greg Stark (17:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql
Bruce Momjian (17:37)
Re: Behavior of shared/exclusive row locks
Alvaro Herrera (21:20)
Re: Behavior of shared/exclusive row locks
Tom Lane (21:51)
Re: Behavior of shared/exclusive row locks
Alvaro Herrera (22:14)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Hannu Krosing (22:22)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Josh Berkus (22:40)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Hannu Krosing (22:43)
PITR bad restore possibility?
Rod Taylor (22:44)
Re: [PATCHES] [WIP] shared locks
Tom Lane (23:05)
Developer Community
Juan Jose Costello Levien (23:35)
2005-04-28
Re: PITR bad restore possibility?
Tom Lane (00:14)
Re: Developer Community
Jim C. Nasby (00:22)
Re: PITR bad restore possibility?
Rod Taylor (00:40)
Re: Developer Community
Juan Jose Costello Levien (00:53)
Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop?
Rod Taylor (01:00)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:16)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Bruce Momjian (01:22)
Re: Tablepartitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Neil Conway (01:43)
Increased company involvement
Bruce Momjian (05:09)
Re: Increased company involvement
Joshua D. Drake (05:21)
Re: Increased company involvement
Christopher Kings-Lynne (05:28)
Re: Increased company involvement
Bruce Momjian (05:30)
Re: DO INSTEAD and conditional rules
Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD (05:45)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Joshua D. Drake (05:48)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Bruce Momjian (05:56)
Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop?
Tom Lane (06:11)
Re: Increased company involvement
Thomas Hallgren (07:35)
Re: Increased company involvement
Thomas Hallgren (07:35)
Statement Timeout and Locking
Markus Schaber (10:28)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Hannu Krosing (11:55)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Bruce Momjian (12:20)
Feature freeze date for 8.1
Bruce Momjian (13:02)
Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop?
Rod Taylor (13:54)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters
Tom Lane (14:00)
Re: Statement Timeout and Locking
Tom Lane (14:11)
Re: Statement Timeout and Locking
Kris Jurka (14:21)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Rob Butler (14:28)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Bruno Wolff III (14:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Robert Treat (15:12)
Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Mischa Sandberg (15:21)
Re: Statement Timeout and Locking
Kris Jurka (15:22)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Magnus Hagander (15:38)
Re: Statement Timeout and Locking
Tom Lane (15:59)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Andreas Pflug (16:36)
Re: Statement Timeout and Locking
Markus Schaber (17:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Marko Ristola (17:44)
Re: Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD
Michael Fuhr (18:48)
Re: Increased company involvement
Andy Astor (19:01)
Re: Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD
Thomas Hallgren (19:47)
pgsql: Implement sharable row-level locks, and use them for foreign key
Tom Lane (21:47)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement sharable row-level locks, and use them for foreign key
Alvaro Herrera (23:53)
2005-04-29
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters
Brent Verner (00:49)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Josh Berkus (03:13)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement sharable row-level locks, and use them for foreign key
Tom Lane (04:17)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Bruce Momjian (04:35)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Christopher Browne (04:57)
Re: Distinct-Sampling (Gibbons paper) for Postgres
a3a18850 (05:10)
Re: Distinct-Sampling (Gibbons paper) for Postgres
Josh Berkus (05:22)
Re: Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD
Michael Fuhr (05:57)
Re: [GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD
Thomas Hallgren (06:26)
PseudoPartitioning and agregates
Sokolov Yura (11:54)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Hannu Krosing (12:29)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Tom Lane (14:00)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Bruce Momjian (14:09)
performance of bitmap scans in nested loop joins
Sergey E. Koposov (14:17)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters
Tom Lane (14:17)
Re: [GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD
Tom Lane (14:36)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Matthew T. O'Connor (15:40)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Marc G. Fournier (15:43)
Re: pg_restore stuck in a loop?
Tom Lane (15:50)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Bruno Wolff III (15:51)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Tom Lane (15:59)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Bruno Wolff III (16:10)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Marc G. Fournier (16:34)
Re: [GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD
Michael Fuhr (17:21)
Re: [GENERAL] Returning a RECORD, not SETOF RECORD
Tom Lane (17:34)
Re: performance of bitmap scans in nested loop joins
Tom Lane (18:01)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters
Alvaro Herrera (19:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Andrew Dunstan (21:53)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Christopher Browne (22:15)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Jim C. Nasby (23:39)
2005-04-30
Re: performance of bitmap scans in nested loop joins
Sergey E. Koposov (00:01)
SPI bug.
Tzahi Fadida (01:25)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Marc G. Fournier (01:57)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Bruce Momjian (03:42)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Matthew T. O'Connor (04:06)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Tom Lane (04:12)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Kris Jurka (05:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Joshua D. Drake (06:02)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Jim C. Nasby (06:18)
Python
James William Pye (06:18)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Joshua D. Drake (06:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Jim C. Nasby (06:29)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Jim C. Nasby (06:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Joshua D. Drake (06:36)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Nicolai Petri (lists) (08:37)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Kris Jurka (10:05)
Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream
Neil Conway (11:26)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Rob Butler (12:54)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Bruce Momjian (13:04)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Bruce Momjian (13:13)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Bruce Momjian (17:04)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Christopher Browne (17:17)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Christopher Browne (17:34)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Christopher Browne (18:00)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Christopher Browne (18:39)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Robert Treat (19:14)
Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful
Tom Lane (20:17)
pg_locks needs a facelift
Tom Lane (21:12)
Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful
elein (21:21)
Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful
Tom Lane (21:31)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
David Fetter (21:40)
Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered
James William Pye (23:26)
Re: Output functions with multiple arguments considered harmful
elein (23:35)
OLAP and PG and deja-vu
Mischa Sandberg (23:41)
2005-05-01
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Robert Treat (01:34)
pl/Python
James William Pye (01:37)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Robert Treat (01:40)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Robert Treat (01:59)
Re: SPI bug.
Neil Conway (06:00)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Sander Steffann (10:00)
Re: SPI bug.
Neil Conway (11:54)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
adnandursun (12:09)
Re: SPI bug.
Andrew - Supernews (12:40)
Re: SPI bug.
Thomas Hallgren (13:49)
Re: SPI bug.
Neil Conway (14:02)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Alvaro Herrera (14:25)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Peter Eisentraut (14:44)
Re: SPI bug.
Thomas Hallgren (14:50)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Dennis Bjorklund (14:56)
Re: SPI bug.
Tom Lane (15:29)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Tom Lane (15:37)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
adnandursun (16:34)
Network write errors (was: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1)
Andrew - Supernews (16:39)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
adnandursun (16:57)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Dennis Bjorklund (17:35)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
adnandursun (18:17)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Christopher Browne (19:03)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Hannu Krosing (19:23)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Bruno Wolff III (19:35)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
adnandursun (20:30)
custom guc vars
Andrew Dunstan (22:38)
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Marc G. Fournier (23:58)
2005-05-02
Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
Marc G. Fournier (00:01)
Re: SPI bug.
Neil Conway (00:40)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Christopher Browne (01:09)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:48)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Neil Conway (02:05)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Oliver Jowett (03:58)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Jaime Casanova (04:08)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Neil Conway (04:14)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Tom Lane (04:25)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Tom Lane (04:41)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Neil Conway (05:05)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Oliver Jowett (05:20)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Russell Smith (05:22)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Tom Lane (05:35)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Tom Lane (05:56)
Re: SPI bug.
Thomas Hallgren (06:00)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Tom Lane (06:01)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Dennis Bjorklund (06:06)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Neil Conway (06:07)
Re: SPI bug.
Thomas Hallgren (06:52)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Oliver Jowett (06:53)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Oliver Jowett (06:56)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Peter Eisentraut (08:11)
Re: custom guc vars
Brent Verner (08:15)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Oliver Jowett (08:49)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
adnandursun (08:52)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
adnandursun (08:58)
Using LDAP for authorization
Magnus Hagander (09:12)
Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
adnandursun (09:12)
Prev
|
Next
Privacy Policy
|
About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group