Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2005-04-22 00:00

2005-04-22

• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Stephen Frost (00:00)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Stephen Frost (00:05)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Andrew Dunstan (00:12)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Stephen Frost (00:14)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Bruce Momjian (00:27)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Stephen Frost (00:31)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Paul Tillotson (00:52)
• Re: Proposal for background vacuum full/cluster Paul Tillotson (00:53)
• Re: Proposal for background vacuum full/cluster Paul Tillotson (00:53)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Stephen Frost (00:59)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Greg Stark (03:03)
• Re: Proposal for background vacuum full/cluster Alvaro Herrera (03:15)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Bruce Momjian (03:17)
• Re: Proposal for background vacuum full/cluster Qingqing Zhou (03:29)
• slides on the optimizer Neil Conway (08:33)
• PQfmod and varchars Shachar Shemesh (08:47)
• Fwd: [HACKERS] slides on the optimizer Volkan YAZICI (08:55)
• Re: PQfmod and varchars Andrew - Supernews (11:21)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Eliot Simcoe (13:14)
• Re: slides on the optimizer Oleg Bartunov (13:44)
• Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Marc G. Fournier (13:56)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (14:09)
• Re: PQfmod and varchars Tom Lane (14:31)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Marc G. Fournier (14:46)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Tom Lane (14:58)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (15:10)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Marc G. Fournier (15:17)
• possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Hannu Krosing (15:17)
• possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Hannu Krosing (15:34)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Alvaro Herrera (15:34)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Bruce Momjian (15:40)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (15:44)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Jochem van Dieten (15:53)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Stephen Frost (15:53)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Tom Lane (15:56)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Hannu Krosing (16:25)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Joshua D. Drake (16:42)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (17:02)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Alvaro Herrera (17:05)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (17:10)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Bruce Momjian (17:14)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (17:23)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler Chuck McDevitt (17:35)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Andrew Dunstan (17:45)
• Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Tom Lane (17:58)
• Re: Proposal for background vacuum full/cluster Jim C. Nasby (18:03)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Dann Corbit (18:07)
• Re: Proposal for background vacuum full/cluster Jim C. Nasby (18:09)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Jim C. Nasby (18:17)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Tom Lane (18:21)
• Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Jim C. Nasby (18:23)
• Re: Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Marko Ristola (18:39)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Dave Held (18:39)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (18:47)
• Re: Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (18:52)
• Re: TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Josh Berkus (18:55)
• Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Josh Berkus (18:58)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Bruce Momjian (18:58)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Ron Mayer (19:20)
• Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Tom Lane (19:30)
• Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Jan Wieck (19:36)
• Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Josh Berkus (19:42)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Stephen Frost (19:47)
• Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Tom Lane (19:53)
• Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Tom Lane (20:02)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted Antoine Martin (20:02)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Hannu Krosing (20:13)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (20:30)
• Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Jan Wieck (20:35)
• Re: Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (20:36)
• Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Josh Berkus (20:46)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Andrew Dunstan (20:49)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (21:05)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Bruce Momjian (21:16)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Andrew Dunstan (21:29)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Simon Riggs (21:43)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Dave Held (21:49)
• Re: slides on the optimizer elein (22:05)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! :) Tom Lane (22:16)
• Re: Bitmap scans vs. the statistics views Hannu Krosing (23:40)

2005-04-23

• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Neil Conway (01:58)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Alvaro Herrera (02:21)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Russell Smith (03:43)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Bruce Momjian (04:02)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Kevin Brown (06:28)
• Re: Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Greg Stark (08:02)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Hannu Krosing (09:17)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted Stephen Frost (13:02)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords Stephen Frost (13:10)
• Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted Antoine Martin (14:53)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Ron Mayer (22:04)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Ron Mayer (22:12)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Tom Lane (22:27)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Alvaro Herrera (23:24)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Tom Lane (23:33)
• Re: Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (23:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Andrew Dunstan (23:44)
• Re: Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (23:53)

2005-04-24

• How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Hannu Krosing (00:43)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Paul Tillotson (02:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Tom Lane (04:48)
• Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs Tom Lane (05:52)
• Constant WAL replay Hans-Jürgen Schönig (06:10)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Tom Lane (06:28)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Neil Conway (06:40)
• Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:23)
• Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs Oleg Bartunov (07:38)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Klaus Naumann (07:59)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Hannu Krosing (09:02)
• How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Hannu Krosing (09:02)
• Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs Thomas Hallgren (09:05)
• Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs John Hansen (10:02)
• Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs Oleg Bartunov (10:41)
• Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs Thomas Hallgren (12:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Bruce Momjian (12:35)
• I know I am behind Bruce Momjian (12:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (12:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Bruce Momjian (12:50)
• Re: Woo hoo ... a whole new set of compiler headaches!! Neil Conway (13:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (14:09)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Tom Lane (15:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane (16:01)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Alvaro Herrera (17:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Marko Ristola (17:09)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Alvaro Herrera (17:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Andrew Dunstan (17:58)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Joshua D. Drake (18:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (18:30)
• Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction Tom Lane (18:41)
• Re: W[i/e]rd performance issue with 8.1cvs Josh Berkus (18:52)
• Re: W[i/e]rd performance issue with 8.1cvs Tom Lane (19:01)
• Re: W[i/e]rd performance issue with 8.1cvs Josh Berkus (19:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (19:08)
• Re: [WIP] shared locks Alvaro Herrera (19:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (19:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Magnus Hagander (20:24)
• Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction Oleg Bartunov (20:45)
• CVS regression test problem Oleg Bartunov (21:18)
• Re: CVS regression test problem Alvaro Herrera (21:53)
• Re: CVS regression test problem Oleg Bartunov (22:14)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Bruce Momjian (22:48)

2005-04-25

• Re: Constant WAL replay Joshua D. Drake (00:06)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Bruce Momjian (01:18)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Bruce Momjian (01:45)
• Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:29)
• Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction Tom Lane (02:45)
• Re: Old-style OR indexscan slated for destruction Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Tom Lane (04:59)
• Re: CVS regression test problem Tom Lane (05:07)
• Passwords in PSQL Rafaqat Ali (06:36)
• Re: Passwords in PSQL Gavin Sherry (07:36)
• Re: Passwords in PSQL Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:38)
• simplify register_dirty_segment() Qingqing Zhou (08:13)
• Re: simplify register_dirty_segment() Tom Lane (08:43)
• Re: Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Simon Riggs (08:57)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes Hannu Krosing (10:54)
• How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Hannu Krosing (10:55)
• Re: possible TODO: read-only tables, select from indexes only. Jochem van Dieten (11:43)
• Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Alvaro Herrera (12:41)
• Re: How to make lazy VACUUM of one table run in several transactions ? Tom Lane (15:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Tom Lane (15:23)
• Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Dave Held (16:15)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (16:34)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Alvaro Herrera (16:39)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (17:08)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (17:15)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (17:17)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (17:19)
• Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (17:28)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (17:29)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Michael Paesold (17:30)
• [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters Brent Verner (17:32)
• Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Michael Paesold (17:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Simon Riggs (18:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (19:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus (19:18)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Hans-Jürgen Schönig (19:22)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Hans-Jürgen Schönig (19:25)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Joshua D. Drake (19:59)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Bruce Momjian (20:04)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Hans-Jürgen Schönig (20:06)
• Re: Constant WAL replay Joshua D. Drake (20:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Andrew Dunstan (20:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Dave Held (21:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Tom Lane (21:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (21:28)
• Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (21:52)
• Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Tom Lane (22:26)
• Re: [proposal] protocol extension to support loadable stream filters Tom Lane (22:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Dave Held (22:41)

2005-04-26

• Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:34)
• Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (01:51)
• Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL pam ldap document Bruce Momjian (03:01)
• Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Mark Kirkwood (03:08)
• Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Bruce Momjian (03:23)
• Re: simplify register_dirty_segment() Qingqing Zhou (03:27)
• DO INSTEAD and conditional rules Neil Conway (05:30)
• Re: simplify register_dirty_segment() Tom Lane (05:32)
• Re: [PATCHES] Continue transactions after errors in psql Mark Kirkwood (05:54)