Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open source database.

pgsql-hackers since 2005-04-03 00:00

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

2005-04-03

Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:55)
Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? Thomas Hallgren (08:38)
Transitive Closure and 'pg_inherits' Ioannis Theoharis (14:45)
Recursive SQL Ioannis Theoharis (17:02)
Re: Transitive Closure and 'pg_inherits' Tom Lane (17:13)

2005-04-04

Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Jim C. Nasby (00:41)
Re: psql and mysql Jim C. Nasby (00:50)
Re: HEAD \df doesn't show functions with no arguments Jim C. Nasby (00:59)
Re: Recursive SQL Euler Taveira de Oliveira (01:03)
Re: TSearch2 performance issue? Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:42)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Joshua D. Drake (03:41)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Jim C. Nasby (03:58)
Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? Greg Stark (04:19)
BuildFarm status: recent check failures Michael Glaesemann (06:03)
Re: BuildFarm status: recent check failures Tom Lane (06:08)
Re: TSearch2 performance issue? Teodor Sigaev (07:12)
Re: TSearch2 performance issue? Teodor Sigaev (07:15)
Raise Exception Mario Reis (09:24)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Marco Colombo (09:26)
Re: add_missing_from in 8.1 Neil Conway (10:09)
DELETE ... USING Neil Conway (10:16)
Re: BuildFarm status: recent check failures Jim Buttafuoco (13:32)
Re: Bug in DROP NOT NULL Christopher Kings-Lynne (14:17)
Re: BuildFarm status: recent check failures Tom Lane (14:46)
Re: Vacuum time degrading Tom Lane (14:50)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Joshua D. Drake (15:02)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Joshua D. Drake (15:03)
Unicode problems on IRC Christopher Kings-Lynne (15:20)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Andrew Dunstan (15:36)
Re: Vacuum time degrading Wes (15:38)
Re: DELETE ... USING Tom Lane (15:42)
Re: DELETE ... USING Tom Lane (15:47)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Tom Lane (16:01)
Re: Bug in DROP NOT NULL Alvaro Herrera (16:18)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Andrew Dunstan (16:30)
Re: Raise Exception Alvaro Herrera (16:37)
Re: Notes on lock table spilling Simon Riggs (18:08)
Re: Notes on lock table spilling Merlin Moncure (18:50)
Re: Notes on lock table spilling Greg Stark (19:02)
Re: _RollbackFunc : dead code? Simon Riggs (19:50)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Robert Treat (19:56)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Joshua D. Drake (20:01)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Tom Lane (20:17)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Andrew Dunstan (20:17)
Re: Notes on lock table spilling Alvaro Herrera (20:27)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Joshua D. Drake (20:32)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Tom Lane (20:36)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Robert Treat (20:48)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Joshua D. Drake (20:54)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Doug McNaught (21:00)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Alvaro Herrera (21:03)
Re: Notes on lock table spilling Alvaro Herrera (21:06)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Robert Treat (21:15)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Robert Treat (21:19)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Joshua D. Drake (21:32)
Re: Notes on lock table spilling Simon Riggs (22:47)

2005-04-05

Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Paul Tillotson (00:52)
Re: DELETE ... USING Neil Conway (01:07)
Re: DELETE ... USING Neil Conway (01:18)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Tom Lane (02:06)
Re: DELETE ... USING Euler Taveira de Oliveira (02:15)
Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? Greg Sabino Mullane (02:46)
Re: DELETE ... USING Neil Conway (02:49)
Re: DELETE ... USING Tom Lane (03:30)
Re: Notes on lock table spilling Greg Stark (03:32)
Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? Greg Stark (03:37)
PgFoundry.org busted? Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:46)
Re: PgFoundry.org busted? Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:49)
Re: Notes on lock table spilling Alvaro Herrera (03:49)
Re: PgFoundry.org busted? Alvaro Herrera (03:55)
Compressing WAL Jim C. Nasby (04:04)
Re: DELETE ... USING Neil Conway (04:11)
Re: DELETE ... USING Tom Lane (05:02)
Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? Tom Lane (06:28)
Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? Christopher Kings-Lynne (06:40)
Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? Dennis Bjorklund (07:04)
Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? Tom Lane (07:43)
Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? Terry Yapt (07:51)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Russell Smith (08:06)
Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? Andrew Dunstan (08:44)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Martijn van Oosterhout (09:02)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Robin Ericsson (09:17)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Martijn van Oosterhout (09:56)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Robin Ericsson (10:01)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Martín Marqués (12:07)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Martín Marqués (12:25)
Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? Robert Treat (13:01)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Scott Marlowe (14:41)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Tom Lane (15:05)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Tom Lane (15:15)
Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? Tom Lane (15:22)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Joshua D. Drake (15:26)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Marc G. Fournier (15:33)
Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? Oleg Bartunov (15:33)
Re: Should we still require RETURN in plpgsql? Tom Lane (15:51)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? tony (15:53)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Tom Lane (16:00)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Tom Lane (16:05)
Re: Vacuum time degrading Wes (16:08)
Re: Vacuum time degrading Tom Lane (16:15)
Re: Vacuum time degrading Wes (16:47)
Re: Vacuum time degrading Tom Lane (16:59)
REINDEX ALL Joshua D. Drake (18:47)
Re: REINDEX ALL Hans-Jürgen Schönig (18:54)
Re: REINDEX ALL Tom Lane (19:25)
Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry Tom Lane (20:19)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Russ Brown (20:21)
Re: Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry Alvaro Herrera (20:32)
Catching DDL events (or equivalent functionality) Master of the beasts (20:37)
Re: REINDEX ALL Joshua D. Drake (21:45)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Joshua D. Drake (21:46)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Joshua D. Drake (21:49)
Re: REINDEX ALL Andreas Pflug (22:18)
Re: REINDEX ALL Russell Smith (23:27)
Re: REINDEX ALL Joshua D. Drake (23:34)

2005-04-06

Re: DELETE ... USING Neil Conway (07:08)
8.0.2 beta announcement?? Dave Page (09:27)
Re: 8.0.2 beta announcement?? Neil Conway (09:56)
Re: 8.0.2 beta announcement?? Dave Page (10:24)
Re: DELETE ... USING Euler Taveira de Oliveira (10:45)
Re: DELETE ... USING Neil Conway (10:51)
prepared statements don't log arguments? Palle Girgensohn (13:01)
Re: Two phase commit Heikki Linnakangas (13:59)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Greg Stark (14:39)
Re: 8.0.2 beta announcement?? Marc G. Fournier (15:07)
Another trip for me Bruce Momjian (15:21)
Re: 8.0.2 beta announcement?? Dave Page (15:30)
Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Arjen van der Meijden (16:52)
Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Steve Atkins (17:04)
Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Arjen van der Meijden (17:40)
Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Tom Lane (17:42)
Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Arjen van der Meijden (18:00)
Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Mischa (18:35)
Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Tom Lane (20:51)
Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) Tom Lane (22:09)
Re: [HACKERS] Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) Jim C. Nasby (22:25)
Re: [HACKERS] Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) Tom Lane (22:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan John A Meinel (22:54)
Re: [HACKERS] Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) Tom Lane (23:06)
Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for Simon Riggs (23:24)

2005-04-07

Re: DELETE ... USING Neil Conway (01:57)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:59)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Neil Conway (02:14)
Shared row locking, revisited Alvaro Herrera (02:17)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Abhijit Menon-Sen (02:22)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Alvaro Herrera (02:23)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Oliver Jowett (02:27)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Neil Conway (02:33)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Oliver Jowett (02:34)
Did this issue ever get resolved? Mike G. (03:11)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Tom Lane (04:37)
Re: Did this issue ever get resolved? Qingqing Zhou (06:11)
Re: Shared row locking, revisited Qingqing Zhou (06:34)
About index_build Alexey Slynko (07:43)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Palle Girgensohn (08:25)
'now' runtime Karel Zak (11:13)
Re: Shared row locking, revisited Alvaro Herrera (12:11)
Re: About index_build Tom Lane (14:11)
Re: 'now' runtime Tom Lane (14:14)
Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) Tom Lane (14:20)
Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) Bruno Wolff III (14:31)
Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) Mischa (21:26)
Re: [HACKERS] Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) Jim C. Nasby (21:40)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Simon Riggs (22:31)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Palle Girgensohn (22:51)
Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) Tom Lane (23:58)

2005-04-08

Re: Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry Bernd Helmle (00:27)
Re: Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) a3a18850 (00:30)
Re: Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry Alvaro Herrera (00:48)
Re: add_missing_from in 8.1 Neil Conway (01:13)
8.0.2 bundled ... Marc G. Fournier (03:41)
Weird psql crash Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:37)
Re: Weird psql crash Tom Lane (04:44)
Re: Weird psql crash Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:50)
Re: 8.0.2 bundled ... Tom Lane (04:54)
Re: Weird psql crash Tom Lane (05:03)
Re: Compressing WAL Qingqing Zhou (05:36)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Simon Riggs (06:49)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Oliver Jowett (06:57)
Re: prepared statements don't log arguments? Tom Lane (07:11)
Re: Call for objections: merge Resdom with TargetEntry Bernd Helmle (09:04)
Functionscan estimates Josh Berkus (22:15)
Re: Functionscan estimates Michael Fuhr (22:38)
Re: Functionscan estimates Alvaro Herrera (22:45)
Re: Functionscan estimates Josh Berkus (23:04)
Tab-completion feature ? Sergey E. Koposov (23:43)
Re: Functionscan estimates Alvaro Herrera (23:57)

2005-04-09

Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) Tom Lane (00:50)
Re: [HACKERS] plPHP in core? Bruce Momjian (01:10)
Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) Bruno Wolff III (02:02)
Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) Bruno Wolff III (02:06)
Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) Bruno Wolff III (02:44)
Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) Mark Kirkwood (03:18)
Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) Tom Lane (03:36)
Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) Tom Lane (03:37)
Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) Tom Lane (03:40)
Re: Functionscan estimates Tom Lane (04:00)
Re: DELETE ... USING Bruce Momjian (04:06)
Re: Optimizing maximum/minimum queries (yet again) Bruno Wolff III (04:11)
Re: DELETE ... USING Neil Conway (04:12)

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group