Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2005-03-10 00:00

2005-03-10

• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Kevin Brown (00:01)
• Re: pgpool question Tatsuo Ishii (01:25)
• Re: could not read, could not write, could not fsync, Windows 2000, PostgreSQL 8.0.1 Qingqing Zhou (02:15)
• We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Tom Lane (02:21)
• Re: pgpool question Jeff Hoffmann (03:14)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Kevin Brown (03:30)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Greg Stark (03:46)
• Re: One vacuum full is not enough. Christopher Browne (03:47)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (03:51)
• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Greg Stark (03:53)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:00)
• Information schema tweak? Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:23)
• Re: pgpool question Oleg Bartunov (04:26)
• Re: pgpool question Tatsuo Ishii (04:35)
• Re: pgpool question Oleg Bartunov (04:43)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Tom Lane (04:44)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Tom Lane (05:06)
• Re: Information schema tweak? Tom Lane (05:09)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Mark Shewmaker (05:20)
• Re: Information schema tweak? Christopher Kings-Lynne (05:25)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Dann Corbit (05:28)
• NIST Test Suite Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:10)
• Re: NIST Test Suite Tom Lane (07:28)
• Re: NIST Test Suite Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:35)
• Re: NIST Test Suite Tom Lane (07:39)
• Re: One vacuum full is not enough. Gaetano Mendola (09:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD (09:17)
• Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Milen A. Radev (09:19)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Michael Wimmer (09:28)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Laszlo Hornyak (12:28)
• Re: Functions and transactions Kris Kiger (14:27)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren (14:34)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Tom Lane (14:56)
• Re: Functions and transactions Tom Lane (15:42)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Michael Fuhr (15:57)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Tom Lane (16:21)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Milen A. Radev (16:45)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Milen A. Radev (16:49)
• Grant ALL on schema Hemapriya (17:01)
• TODO item: support triggers on columns Chris Mair (17:06)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Tom Lane (17:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Tom Lane (17:44)
• Raw size Ioannis Theoharis (18:07)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GR Bort, Paul (18:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Gill, Jerry T. (18:13)
• Re: Raw size Bort, Paul (18:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Kevin HaleBoyes (18:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Barry Lind (18:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without Gary Doades (19:12)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (19:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without Michael Fuhr (19:24)
• PostgreSQL pam ldap document Adrian Nida (19:36)
• Re: Functions and transactions Kris Kiger (19:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY johnnnnnn (20:01)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Jaime Casanova (20:14)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (21:19)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian (21:25)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (21:26)
• Re: Raw size Jaime Casanova (21:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Mark Kirkwood (21:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Mark Shewmaker (22:42)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Nicolai Tufar (22:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Tom Lane (23:09)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Laszlo Hornyak (23:35)
• Re: BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause Tom Lane (23:49)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (23:55)

2005-03-11

• Re: Functions and transactions Tom Lane (00:10)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (00:21)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP John R Pierce (00:32)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren (00:36)
• Re: Raw size Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:27)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression pgsql (01:29)
• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Kevin Brown (02:00)
• Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:40)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Tom Lane (03:58)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression Bruce Momjian (04:10)
• Re: BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause Peter Wright (05:45)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (05:58)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (06:14)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (06:41)
• Re: BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause Tom Lane (06:48)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Laszlo Hornyak (08:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Heikki Linnakangas (08:20)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren (09:53)
• Re: [PATCHES] WAL: O_DIRECT and multipage-writer (+ Simon Riggs (09:55)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Milen A. Radev (10:06)
• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Richard Huxton (10:56)
• Re: Raw size Ioannis Theoharis (13:08)
• Re: Raw size Ioannis Theoharis (13:23)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Terry Yapt (13:37)
• Explain Analyze mode Ioannis Theoharis (14:16)
• Re: Grant ALL on schema Bruno Wolff III (14:55)
• Re: Explain Analyze mode Oleg Bartunov (15:28)
• Re: postgreSQL-8.0.1 configure --enable-thread-safety with Bruce Momjian (15:32)
• Re: postgreSQL-8.0.1 configure --enable-thread-safety with Bruce Momjian (15:36)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (16:18)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (16:21)
• Re: TODO item: support triggers on columns Bruce Momjian (16:32)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Tom Lane (16:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL pam ldap document Bruce Momjian (16:42)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Michael Fuhr (16:46)
• Re: Functions and transactions Kris Kiger (16:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL pam ldap document David Fetter (16:49)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression pgsql (17:02)
• Re: TODO item: support triggers on columns Alvaro Herrera (17:12)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression Bruce Momjian (17:14)
• Re: TODO item: support triggers on columns Bruce Momjian (17:18)
• Re: TODO item: support triggers on columns Chris Mair (17:19)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression Tom Lane (17:23)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression Bruce Momjian (17:37)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression Bruce Momjian (17:44)
• Bumping libpq version number? Bruce Momjian (17:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL pam ldap document Adrian Nida (18:00)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Stephen Frost (18:11)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Kurt Roeckx (18:21)
• Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around Andrew Sullivan (18:25)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Bruce Momjian (18:29)
• Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations Hans-Jürgen Schönig (18:31)
• Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Evgen Potemkin (18:46)
• Re: Functions and transactions Tom Lane (18:54)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Kurt Roeckx (19:28)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Bruce Momjian (19:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL pam ldap document Dick Davies (20:08)
• Re: [PATCHES] BUG #1466: syslogger issues Bruce Momjian (21:28)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian (21:30)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Peter Eisentraut (21:39)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Bruce Momjian (21:47)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Bruce Momjian (21:49)
• Re: [PATCHES] BUG #1466: syslogger issues Tom Lane (21:54)
• Re: [PATCHES] BUG #1466: syslogger issues Bruce Momjian (21:56)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Peter Eisentraut (22:17)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Marc G. Fournier (22:17)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Peter Eisentraut (22:18)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Kurt Roeckx (22:18)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Bruce Momjian (22:26)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (23:58)

2005-03-12

• partial vacuum Satoshi Nagayasu (00:05)
• Re: partial vacuum Tom Lane (00:58)
• Re: partial vacuum Satoshi Nagayasu (01:38)
• Re: partial vacuum Tatsuo Ishii (02:26)
• Re: Raw size Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:30)
• Re: BUG #1466: syslogger issues Bruce Momjian (02:45)
• cvsup binaries? Neil Conway (07:15)
• Re: cvsup binaries? Tom Lane (07:24)
• Re: cvsup binaries? Joe Conway (09:18)
• Re: cvsup binaries? Andrew Dunstan (14:01)
• Re: cvsup binaries? Devrim GUNDUZ (14:28)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (15:00)
• Re: cvsup binaries? Joe Conway (15:12)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Milen A. Radev (16:34)
• REL8_0_STABLE and 8.0.1 release client logging difference Oleg Bartunov (21:37)
• Re: REL8_0_STABLE and 8.0.1 release client logging difference Bruce Momjian (21:49)
• Re: TODO item: support triggers on columns Robert Treat (21:51)
• Re: REL8_0_STABLE and 8.0.1 release client logging difference Oleg Bartunov (22:00)
• Re: REL8_0_STABLE and 8.0.1 release client logging difference Bruce Momjian (22:07)
• Re: REL8_0_STABLE and 8.0.1 release client logging difference Tom Lane (22:26)

2005-03-13

• Null Value Stored for Date e TimeStamp Fernando Ferreira (00:50)
• Strange postgres planner behaviour Sergey E. Koposov (01:58)
• Re: Strange postgres planner behaviour Tom Lane (04:58)
• Question about encoding combinations Bruce Momjian (05:31)
• Re: REL8_0_STABLE and 8.0.1 release client logging difference Oleg Bartunov (08:40)
• Re: REL8_0_STABLE and 8.0.1 release client logging difference Andrew Dunstan (09:06)
• Re: Question about encoding combinations Peter Eisentraut (11:04)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Andrew - Supernews (13:22)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Greg Sabino Mullane (13:38)
• Re: TODO item: support triggers on columns Greg Sabino Mullane (14:18)
• Re: REL8_0_STABLE and 8.0.1 release client logging difference Oleg Bartunov (14:23)
• Re: Strange postgres planner behaviour Oleg Bartunov (14:26)
• Re: TODO item: support triggers on columns Chris Mair (14:34)
• How to read query plan Miroslav Šulc (15:32)
• Re: How to read query plan John Arbash Meinel (16:24)
• Re: How to read query plan Ragnar Hafstað (16:51)
• Re: How to read query plan Miroslav Šulc (17:10)
• Re: How to read query plan Miroslav Šulc (17:23)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Geoffrey (17:24)
• Re: How to read query plan John Arbash Meinel (17:30)
• Re: How to read query plan John Arbash Meinel (17:50)
• Re: How to read query plan Miroslav Šulc (18:10)
• date_trunc problem in HEAD Robert Creager (18:12)
• Re: date_trunc problem in HEAD Kurt Roeckx (18:40)
• Re: TODO item: support triggers on columns Tom Lane (18:47)
• Re: How to read query plan Miroslav Šulc (19:07)
• Re: How to read query plan Tom Lane (19:15)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Bruce Momjian (19:22)
• Re: How to read query plan John Arbash Meinel (19:26)
• Re: How to read query plan Miroslav Šulc (19:43)
• Re: date_trunc problem in HEAD Robert Creager (19:48)
• Re: How to read query plan Miroslav Šulc (19:51)
• Re: How to read query plan Tom Lane (19:54)
• Re: How to read query plan Miroslav Šulc (20:03)
• Re: How to read query plan Tom Lane (20:26)
• Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations Simon Riggs (21:26)
• Re: Bumping libpq version number? Andrew - Supernews (21:36)
• where is the locale set for each server instance? Palle Girgensohn (21:47)
• materialized views Oleg Bartunov (23:28)
• Re: date_trunc problem in HEAD Kurt Roeckx (23:54)

2005-03-14

• Re: [PERFORM] How to read query plan Tom Lane (00:08)
• Re: TODO item: support triggers on columns Bruce Momjian (03:00)
• Re: [BUGS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Greg Stark (04:24)
• Re: [BUGS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Bruno Wolff III (04:56)