Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2005-03-06 22:45

March 6, 2005

• Re: About b-tree usage Jeff Davis (22:45)
• BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause Peter Wright (22:47)

March 7, 2005

• ERROR: unrecognized node type in PostgresMain( ) mchron (00:40)
• Re: Solving hash table overrun problems Aaron Birkland (00:46)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Greg Sabino Mullane (01:19)
• Re: ERROR: unrecognized node type in PostgresMain( ) Tom Lane (02:36)
• Re: buildfarm issues Josh Berkus (05:12)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Michael Paesold (08:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables for Pavel Stehule (09:28)
• Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations Mark Cave-Ayland (11:04)
• get generated keys and insert returning Dave Cramer (13:06)
• Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations Tom Lane (14:39)
• anoncvs unreachable? Michael Fuhr (15:40)
• Re: anoncvs unreachable? Michael Fuhr (15:47)
• Re: buildfarm issues Bruno Wolff III (16:39)
• Re: anoncvs unreachable? Marc G. Fournier (17:34)
• Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations Gaetano Mendola (17:45)
• Recording vacuum/analyze/dump times Jim Buttafuoco (18:03)
• Re: Recording vacuum/analyze/dump times Heikki Linnakangas (18:35)
• Re: Recording vacuum/analyze/dump times Jim Buttafuoco (18:42)
• Re: About b-tree usage Ioannis Theoharis (18:43)
• Re: Recording vacuum/analyze/dump times Matthew T. O'Connor (18:56)
• Re: Recording vacuum/analyze/dump times Jim Buttafuoco (19:04)
• Re: About b-tree usage Jeff Davis (19:04)
• Re: About b-tree usage Tom Lane (19:09)
• Re: Recording vacuum/analyze/dump times Matthew T. O'Connor (21:15)
• Re: Recording vacuum/analyze/dump times Jim Buttafuoco (21:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables Neil Conway (22:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables for Tom Lane (22:31)
• One vacuum full is not enough. Gaetano Mendola (23:52)
• Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations Simon Riggs (23:53)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Greg Sabino Mullane (23:56)
• A bad plan Gaetano Mendola (23:59)

March 8, 2005

• Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations Tom Lane (01:50)
• Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations Greg Stark (02:18)
• Best practices: MERGE David Fetter (03:34)
• Re: Best practices: MERGE Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:45)
• Re: Best practices: MERGE David Fetter (04:08)
• Re: Best practices: MERGE Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:27)
• Re: A bad plan Josh Berkus (06:13)
• Re: Indicies work on FreeBSD, not on Linux Michael Fuhr (06:59)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Michael Paesold (07:05)
• Re: Continue transactions after errors in psql Tom Lane (07:21)
• Re: BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause Tom Lane (08:07)
• Re: Best practices: MERGE David Fetter (08:25)
• Re: Best practices: MERGE Simon Riggs (08:28)
• Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations Simon Riggs (08:31)
• Re: Best practices: MERGE Christopher Kings-Lynne (08:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Implementation of SQLCODE and SQLERRM variables for Pavel Stehule (09:18)
• Re: A bad plan Gaetano Mendola (10:04)
• ERROR: unrecognized node type in PostgresMain( ) mchron (13:13)
• Re: About b-tree usage Ioannis Theoharis (13:30)
• Re: About b-tree usage Michael Paesold (13:48)
• Re: About b-tree usage Klaus Naumann (13:57)
• Re: Vacuum time degrading Wes (15:44)
• Re: ERROR: unrecognized node type in PostgresMain( ) Tom Lane (16:52)
• How to cast VARCHAR to BYTEA and vice-versa? Moran.Michael (16:56)
• Re: How to cast VARCHAR to BYTEA and vice-versa? Tom Lane (17:18)
• Re: How to cast VARCHAR to BYTEA and vice-versa? Moran.Michael (22:16)
• fool-toleranced optimizer Oleg Bartunov (23:05)

March 9, 2005

• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Neil Conway (00:02)
• Re: How to cast VARCHAR to BYTEA and vice-versa? Alvaro Herrera (00:33)
• Re: How to cast VARCHAR to BYTEA and vice-versa? Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:10)
• Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch Bruce Momjian (03:52)
• Re: postgreSQL-8.0.1 configure --enable-thread-safety with Bruce Momjian (04:28)
• Re: postgreSQL-8.0.1 compilation with icc-8.1 on Itanium-2 Bruce Momjian (04:29)
• Re: postgreSQL-8.0.1 compilation with icc-8.1 on Itanium-2 Bruce Momjian (04:30)
• two questions related to tablespace in PG8.0.1 Qingqing Zhou (04:41)
• Re: two questions related to tablespace in PG8.0.1 Tom Lane (06:00)
• Re: postgreSQL-8.0.1 configure --enable-thread-safety with Neil Conway (06:06)
• Re: postgreSQL-8.0.1 configure --enable-thread-safety with icc-8.1 on RHEL-AS3 Itanium-2 gives error Vikram Kalsi (06:24)
• Re: two questions related to tablespace in PG8.0.1 Qingqing Zhou (06:49)
• Current CVS parallel test lock Christopher Kings-Lynne (06:58)
• Re: Current CVS parallel test lock Qingqing Zhou (07:09)
• Re: Current CVS parallel test lock Tom Lane (07:11)
• Re: Current CVS parallel test lock Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:24)
• Re: Current CVS parallel test lock Michael Fuhr (07:38)
• Re: Current CVS parallel test lock Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:43)
• Re: Current CVS parallel test lock Michael Fuhr (07:56)
• Re: Current CVS parallel test lock Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:59)
• Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations tzirechnoy (08:13)
• Re: About b-tree usage Jeff Davis (09:23)
• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Simon Riggs (11:07)
• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Neil Conway (11:38)
• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Simon Riggs (12:23)
• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Oleg Bartunov (12:31)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (12:40)
• Re: Current CVS parallel test lock Tom Lane (14:22)
• Re: Current CVS parallel test lock Christopher Kings-Lynne (15:17)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression pgsql (15:38)
• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Greg Stark (15:44)
• Re: One vacuum full is not enough. Hannu Krosing (16:39)
• pgpool question Oleg Bartunov (17:10)
• Re: pgpool question Jeff Hoffmann (17:23)
• Re: pgpool question Oleg Bartunov (17:27)
• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Josh Berkus (17:40)
• Re: pgpool question Jeff Hoffmann (17:44)
• Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren (18:27)
• Functions and transactions Kris Kiger (20:52)
• Re: Functions and transactions Tsirkin Evgeny (21:07)
• Re: Functions and transactions Kris Kiger (21:10)
• Re: Functions and transactions Tsirkin Evgeny (21:51)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Tom Lane (22:22)
• Re: Functions and transactions Tom Lane (22:34)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren (23:03)
• Re: BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause Tom Lane (23:40)

March 10, 2005

• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Kevin Brown (00:01)
• Re: pgpool question Tatsuo Ishii (01:25)
• Re: could not read, could not write, could not fsync, Windows 2000, PostgreSQL 8.0.1 Qingqing Zhou (02:15)
• We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Tom Lane (02:21)
• Re: pgpool question Jeff Hoffmann (03:14)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Kevin Brown (03:30)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Greg Stark (03:46)
• Re: One vacuum full is not enough. Christopher Browne (03:47)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (03:51)
• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Greg Stark (03:53)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:00)
• Information schema tweak? Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:23)
• Re: pgpool question Oleg Bartunov (04:26)
• Re: pgpool question Tatsuo Ishii (04:35)
• Re: pgpool question Oleg Bartunov (04:43)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Tom Lane (04:44)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Tom Lane (05:06)
• Re: Information schema tweak? Tom Lane (05:09)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Mark Shewmaker (05:20)
• Re: Information schema tweak? Christopher Kings-Lynne (05:25)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Dann Corbit (05:28)
• NIST Test Suite Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:10)
• Re: NIST Test Suite Tom Lane (07:28)
• Re: NIST Test Suite Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:35)
• Re: NIST Test Suite Tom Lane (07:39)
• Re: One vacuum full is not enough. Gaetano Mendola (09:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD (09:17)
• Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Milen A. Radev (09:19)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Michael Wimmer (09:28)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Laszlo Hornyak (12:28)
• Re: Functions and transactions Kris Kiger (14:27)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren (14:34)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Tom Lane (14:56)
• Re: Functions and transactions Tom Lane (15:42)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Michael Fuhr (15:57)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Tom Lane (16:21)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Milen A. Radev (16:45)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Milen A. Radev (16:49)
• Grant ALL on schema Hemapriya (17:01)
• TODO item: support triggers on columns Chris Mair (17:06)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Tom Lane (17:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Tom Lane (17:44)
• Raw size Ioannis Theoharis (18:07)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GR Bort, Paul (18:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Gill, Jerry T. (18:13)
• Re: Raw size Bort, Paul (18:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Kevin HaleBoyes (18:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Barry Lind (18:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without Gary Doades (19:12)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (19:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without Michael Fuhr (19:24)
• PostgreSQL pam ldap document Adrian Nida (19:36)
• Re: Functions and transactions Kris Kiger (19:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY johnnnnnn (20:01)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Jaime Casanova (20:14)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (21:19)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian (21:25)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (21:26)
• Re: Raw size Jaime Casanova (21:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Mark Kirkwood (21:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Mark Shewmaker (22:42)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Nicolai Tufar (22:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY Tom Lane (23:09)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Laszlo Hornyak (23:35)
• Re: BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause Tom Lane (23:49)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (23:55)

March 11, 2005

• Re: Functions and transactions Tom Lane (00:10)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (00:21)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP John R Pierce (00:32)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren (00:36)
• Re: Raw size Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:27)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression pgsql (01:29)
• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Kevin Brown (02:00)
• Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:40)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests Tom Lane (03:58)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression Bruce Momjian (04:10)
• Re: BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause Peter Wright (05:45)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (05:58)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (06:14)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (06:41)
• Re: BUG #1528: Rows returned that should be excluded by WHERE clause Tom Lane (06:48)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Laszlo Hornyak (08:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Heikki Linnakangas (08:20)
• Re: Runtime accepting build discrepancies Thomas Hallgren (09:53)
• Re: [PATCHES] WAL: O_DIRECT and multipage-writer (+ Simon Riggs (09:55)
• Re: Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure Milen A. Radev (10:06)
• Re: fool-toleranced optimizer Richard Huxton (10:56)
• Re: Raw size Ioannis Theoharis (13:08)
• Re: Raw size Ioannis Theoharis (13:23)
• Re: We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP Terry Yapt (13:37)
• Explain Analyze mode Ioannis Theoharis (14:16)
• Re: Grant ALL on schema Bruno Wolff III (14:55)
• Re: Explain Analyze mode Oleg Bartunov (15:28)
• Re: postgreSQL-8.0.1 configure --enable-thread-safety with Bruce Momjian (15:32)