Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2005-02-24 00:00

2005-02-24

• Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane (01:36)
• Finding if old transactions are running... Christopher Browne (02:26)
• Re: problem with function loading Michael Fuhr (03:39)
• Re: Finding if old transactions are running... Christopher Browne (04:47)
• Re: psql: recall previous command? Bruce Momjian (05:12)
• Re: Finding if old transactions are running... Christopher Browne (05:32)
• Re: invalid multibyte character for locale Bjoern Metzdorf (07:41)
• Re: Finding if old transactions are running... Christopher Kings-Lynne (09:29)
• SQL99 Hierarchical queries Evgen Potemkin (10:02)
• Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Christopher Kings-Lynne (13:12)
• Problems With PGAdmin Thiago Luiz (13:48)
• Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Evgen Potemkin (14:11)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Magnus Hagander (14:42)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Christopher Kings-Lynne (14:54)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Christopher Kings-Lynne (15:02)
• Re: invalid multibyte character for locale Tom Lane (15:15)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Tom Lane (15:21)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Magnus Hagander (15:24)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync pgsql (15:58)
• Re: invalid multibyte character for locale Joel Fradkin (16:10)
• Re: Finding if old transactions are running... Tom Lane (16:14)
• Some download statistics Magnus Hagander (16:35)
• Re: invalid multibyte character for locale Bjoern Metzdorf (17:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier (17:28)
• Re: [ADMIN] invalid multibyte character for locale Tom Lane (17:44)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Greg Stark (17:44)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Tom Lane (17:56)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Greg Stark (18:34)
• Re: Finding if old transactions are running... Vsevolod Lobko (18:47)
• [Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@xeocode.com>] Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Greg Stark (19:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Some download statistics John DeSoi (19:19)
• Re: Some download statistics Troels Arvin (20:11)
• Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane (20:13)
• Re: Some download statistics Tom Lane (20:29)
• Re: Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier (20:43)
• Re: psql: recall previous command? Thomas F.O'Connell (21:01)
• Re: Some download statistics Ernst Herzberg (21:27)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Magnus Hagander (21:33)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Magnus Hagander (21:34)
• Re: Some download statistics Magnus Hagander (21:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] Some download statistics Dave Page (21:47)
• Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Francisco Figueiredo Jr. (21:49)
• Re: [NOVICE] Question on TRUNCATE privleges Bruce Momjian (22:10)
• Re: [NOVICE] Question on TRUNCATE privleges Tom Lane (22:15)
• Re: Some download statistics Tom Lane (22:17)
• Re: [NOVICE] Question on TRUNCATE privleges Bruce Momjian (22:21)
• Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian (22:27)
• Re: [NOVICE] Question on TRUNCATE privleges Keith Worthington (22:28)
• Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian (22:28)
• Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane (22:32)
• Re: Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier (22:38)
• Re: Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier (22:40)
• Re: [NOVICE] Question on TRUNCATE privleges Tom Lane (22:47)
• Patch for Postmaster Uptime (from the TODO) Eric Crampton (22:49)
• Re: psql: recall previous command? Neil Conway (23:03)
• Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Gavin Sherry (23:23)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Bruce Momjian (23:45)
• Re: psql: recall previous command? Bruce Momjian (23:56)

2005-02-25

• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (00:02)
• Re: psql: recall previous command? Neil Conway (00:11)
• Re: psql: recall previous command? Bruce Momjian (00:24)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane (00:27)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (00:29)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (00:45)
• Re: Finding if old transactions are running... Bruce Momjian (01:11)
• Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane (01:34)
• Re: Patch for Postmaster Uptime (from the TODO) Tom Lane (01:38)
• Where to see the patch queue (was Re: Patch for Postmaster Uptime (from the TODO)) Eric Crampton (01:54)
• Re: Patch for Postmaster Uptime (from the TODO) Bruce Momjian (02:48)
• Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: Patch for Postmaster Bruce Momjian (02:51)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian (03:05)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane (03:18)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian (03:22)
• Interesting NetBSD annual report Bruce Momjian (04:00)
• Re: BUG #1466: syslogger issues Bruce Momjian (04:33)
• Re: UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian (04:51)
• Re: Can we remove SnapshotSelf? Bruce Momjian (04:59)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Greg Stark (05:07)
• Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Bruce Momjian (05:18)
• Re: Finding if old transactions are running... jtv (06:22)
• Re: Finding if old transactions are running... Tom Lane (06:31)
• Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Marc G. Fournier (06:47)
• Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Neil Conway (06:48)
• Re: UTF8 or Unicode Peter Eisentraut (07:02)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Peter Eisentraut (07:07)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Peter Eisentraut (07:08)
• Re: Finding if old transactions are running... jtv (07:24)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (08:31)
• idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (08:34)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD (08:57)
• Re: UTF8 or Unicode Karel Zak (08:59)
• Re: UTF8 or Unicode Peter Eisentraut (10:01)
• Development Plans Simon Riggs (10:34)
• Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Simon Riggs (11:02)
• Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Simon Riggs (11:04)
• Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Andrew Dunstan (11:05)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Nicolai Tufar (11:08)
• Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Merlin Moncure (13:07)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Simon Riggs (13:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report D'Arcy J.M. Cain (13:42)
• Re: Development Plans Marc G. Fournier (14:42)
• Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Francisco Figueiredo Jr. (14:44)
• Re: Some download statistics Jim C. Nasby (14:52)
• Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane (15:13)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane (15:18)
• Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane (15:23)
• Re: int64/double for time/timestamp Teodor Sigaev (15:25)
• Re: UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian (15:26)
• Re: int64/double for time/timestamp Tom Lane (15:28)
• Re: UTF8 or Unicode Tom Lane (15:33)
• Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Bruce Momjian (15:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report Jim C. Nasby (15:39)
• Re: Development Plans Bruce Momjian (15:40)
• Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane (15:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Bruce Momjian (15:49)
• Re: Development Plans Robert Treat (16:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Christopher Kings-Lynne (16:09)
• Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Matthew T. O'Connor (16:20)
• Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Bruce Momjian (16:21)
• Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane (16:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Matthew T. O'Connor (16:24)
• Re: UTF8 or Unicode Peter Eisentraut (16:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Jim C. Nasby (16:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Tom Lane (16:36)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Peter Eisentraut (16:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Peter Eisentraut (16:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Tom Lane (17:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Christopher Kings-Lynne (17:11)
• Re: Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier (17:18)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Marc G. Fournier (17:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report Marc G. Fournier (17:27)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (17:36)
• Re: Development Plans Josh Berkus (17:41)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.4988 (21 messages) Josh Berkus (17:48)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Tom Lane (17:54)
• Re: Development schedule Tom Lane (17:59)
• Re: Development schedule Josh Berkus (18:03)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.4988 (21 messages) Peter Eisentraut (18:05)
• Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Markus Schaber (18:08)
• Re: Development schedule Marc G. Fournier (18:10)
• Re: Development schedule Marc G. Fournier (18:11)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (18:17)
• Re: Development schedule Josh Berkus (18:18)
• Re: Development schedule Tom Lane (18:19)
• Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Markus Schaber (18:21)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.4988 (21 messages) Marc G. Fournier (18:21)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane (18:25)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (18:26)
• Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane (18:28)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Tom Lane (18:30)
• Re: Development schedule Marc G. Fournier (18:33)
• Re: UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian (18:36)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (18:38)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane (19:17)
• CAN-2005-0247 yo mero (19:29)
• Re: Development schedule Tom Lane (19:34)
• Re: CAN-2005-0247 Tom Lane (19:40)
• Boolean operationsengineer1 (20:02)
• Re: Boolean Tom Lane (20:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report Jim C. Nasby (20:44)
• Re: CAN-2005-0247 yo mero (20:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report Marc G. Fournier (21:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Bruce Momjian (21:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Bruce Momjian (21:52)
• Re: Development schedule Bruce Momjian (22:00)
• Re: Development schedule Tom Lane (22:04)
• Re: Development schedule Bruce Momjian (22:09)
• Modifying COPY TO Dave Held (22:19)
• Re: Modifying COPY TO Tom Lane (22:56)
• Re: Modifying COPY TO Stephen Frost (23:03)

2005-02-26

• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jim C. Nasby (00:03)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (00:04)
• Re: Modifying COPY TO Jim C. Nasby (00:11)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (00:30)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Bruce Momjian (01:51)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Bruce Momjian (01:52)
• Re: Modifying COPY TO Bruce Momjian (01:55)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jim C. Nasby (02:35)
• Re: Modifying COPY TO Andrew - Supernews (04:07)
• Re: Modifying COPY TO Tom Lane (04:46)
• Re: Development Plans Jeff Hoffmann (04:48)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Tom Lane (04:51)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jim C. Nasby (05:49)
• Re: Development Plans Chris Travers (05:50)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (08:22)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans William Volkman (10:28)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Neil Conway (12:08)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Neil Conway (12:39)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Andrew Dunstan (12:45)
• Re: Development schedule Andrew Dunstan (13:13)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Tom Lane (15:47)
• Re: Development Plans Tom Lane (15:57)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jim C. Nasby (16:16)
• Re: Development schedule Joshua D. Drake (18:47)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (19:02)
• Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (19:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian (20:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode lsunley (23:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode lsunley (23:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode lsunley (23:56)