Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2004-06-03 00:00

June 3, 2004

• Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC Bruce Momjian (00:12)
• Re: Default Locale in initdb Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:25)
• Re: Default Locale in initdb Bruce Momjian (01:30)
• Re: Default Locale in initdb Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:51)
• Re: Default Locale in initdb pgsql (01:53)
• pgsql-server: Adjust our timezone library to use pg_time_t (typedef'd as Tom Lane (02:08)
• Re: Default Locale in initdb Andrew Dunstan (02:10)
• Re: pgsql-server: Adjust our timezone library to use pg_time_t (typedef'd Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:23)
• Re: pgsql-server: Adjust our timezone library to use pg_time_t (typedef'd Tom Lane (03:40)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] select like...not using index Tom Lane (04:18)
• Re: Indices pinned in pageable RAM? Tom Lane (05:03)
• Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC Andreas Pflug (08:10)
• Re: ACLs versus ALTER OWNER Fabien COELHO (10:10)
• Re: New btree_gist code has a few problems Teodor Sigaev (12:27)
• Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC Bruce Momjian (14:55)
• PageGetMaxOffsetNumber on uninitialized pages Tom Lane (15:29)
• Re: New btree_gist code has a few problems Tom Lane (15:31)
• Re: pgsql-server: Adjust our timezone library to use Euler Taveira de Oliveira (16:09)
• Re: pgsql-server: Adjust our timezone library to use pg_time_t (typedef'd Tom Lane (16:23)
• Re: PageGetMaxOffsetNumber on uninitialized pages Gaetano Mendola (16:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Configuration patch Tom Lane (16:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Configuration patch pgsql (17:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Configuration patch Tom Lane (18:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Configuration patch pgsql (19:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Enrico Weigelt (19:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Bruce Momjian (19:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Joshua D. Drake (20:18)
• Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info Alvaro Herrera (20:21)
• Re: Check for prepared statement Alvaro Herrera (20:49)
• Re: Nested transactions and tuple header info Bruce Momjian (21:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Enrico Weigelt (21:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Enrico Weigelt (21:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] Configuration patch Bruce Momjian (21:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Joshua D. Drake (22:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Configuration patch Tom Lane (22:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] Configuration patch Andrew Dunstan (22:41)

June 4, 2004

• Understanding transactions Jonathan Gardner (00:38)
• Re: PageGetMaxOffsetNumber on uninitialized pages Gaetano Mendola (01:15)
• Re: Understanding transactions Alvaro Herrera (01:18)
• Re: [PATCHES] dollar quoting Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:56)
• Re: [PATCHES] dollar quoting Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:57)
• Slony-I goes BETA Jan Wieck (05:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? Bruce Momjian (05:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? Tom Lane (05:10)
• upper() / lower() regression test case needed? mike g (05:35)
• Re: OIDs, CTIDs, updateable cursors and friends Greg Stark (05:42)
• Re: upper() / lower() regression test case needed? Christopher Kings-Lynne (06:44)
• Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC Andreas Pflug (08:26)
• Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC Andreas Pflug (08:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Slony-I goes BETA Karel Zak (08:47)
• Re: Converting postgresql.conf parameters to kilobytes Marko Karppinen (10:10)
• Re: Understanding transactions Jochem van Dieten (10:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] Slony-I goes BETA Jan Wieck (11:50)
• The pgreplication project Jan Wieck (12:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Slony-I goes BETA Dave Page (12:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? Bruce Momjian (13:24)
• Re: Converting postgresql.conf parameters to kilobytes Frank Wiles (13:25)
• Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC Bruce Momjian (13:30)
• Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC Andreas Pflug (13:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? Tom Lane (13:43)
• Re: upper() / lower() regression test case needed? Tom Lane (13:57)
• Re: Converting postgresql.conf parameters to kilobytes Greg Stark (14:25)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Slony-I goes BETA Josh Berkus (16:42)
• A modest proposal: allow palloc(0) Tom Lane (16:52)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Slony-I goes BETA Marc G. Fournier (17:53)
• Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Slony-I goes BETA Rick Gigger (19:28)
• Re: TimeOf(Subselects|Joins)FromLargeTables? Dann Corbit (20:28)
• Executor Timings understanding !! Ramanujam H S Iyengar (20:54)
• Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] Slony-I goes BETA Jan Wieck (21:25)

June 5, 2004

• TimeOf(Subselects|Joins)FromLargeTables? Hegedus, Tamas . (00:17)
• Re: TimeOf(Subselects|Joins)FromLargeTables? Dann Corbit (00:42)
• Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 Lamar Owen (03:48)
• Re: TimeOf(Subselects|Joins)FromLargeTables? Tom Lane (04:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --comment? Bruce Momjian (04:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? David Garamond (08:28)
• Re: Tablespaces Christopher Kings-Lynne (10:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Markus Bertheau (13:20)
• Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 Andrew Dunstan (14:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dave Page (16:43)
• I/O support for composite types Tom Lane (16:57)
• Re: Tablespaces Bruce Momjian (18:14)
• Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 Bruce Momjian (18:15)
• Re: Tablespaces Tom Lane (18:18)
• Re: I/O support for composite types Thomas Hallgren (18:45)
• Re: I/O support for composite types elein (19:13)
• Re: I/O support for composite types Tom Lane (19:15)
• Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 Marc G. Fournier (19:36)
• Re: I/O support for composite types Thomas Hallgren (19:43)
• Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 Andrew Dunstan (19:51)
• Why hash indexes suck Tom Lane (20:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? David Garamond (20:11)
• Re: Why hash indexes suck Sailesh Krishnamurthy (20:15)
• Re: I/O support for composite types Tom Lane (20:24)
• Re: Why hash indexes suck Tom Lane (20:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Tom Lane (20:43)
• Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 Marc G. Fournier (20:58)
• Re: I/O support for composite types Tom Lane (21:00)
• Re: I/O support for composite types elein (21:34)
• Re: I/O support for composite types Thomas Hallgren (21:34)
• Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 Andrew Dunstan (22:27)
• Re: Why hash indexes suck Jeff Davis (22:30)

June 6, 2004

• Re: Why hash indexes suck Tom Lane (00:15)
• Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 Marc G. Fournier (01:29)
• Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 Lamar Owen (01:43)
• Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 Andrew Dunstan (03:35)
• Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 Bruce Momjian (04:56)
• Re: Official Freeze Date for 7.5: July 1st, 2004 Tom Lane (05:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? David Garamond (06:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Slony-I goes BETA (possible bug) Jeff Davis (09:21)
• pgsql 7.5 frontend changes wrapup Andreas Pflug (09:34)
• Re: Why hash indexes suck pgsql (14:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Slony-I goes BETA (possible bug) Jan Wieck (17:32)
• Case preserving - suggestions Shachar Shemesh (17:47)
• CREATE DATABASE on the heap with PostgreSQL? Albretch (18:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Slony-I goes BETA (possible bug) Jeff Davis (18:33)
• Re: CREATE DATABASE on the heap with PostgreSQL? Gaetano Mendola (18:43)
• Re: Case preserving - suggestions Tom Lane (21:33)
• Postres dilemma Neeraj Sharma (21:41)
• Re: Check for prepared statement Greg Sabino Mullane (22:57)

June 7, 2004

• serverlog function Andreas Pflug (00:01)
• Re: serverlog function Tom Lane (00:32)
• Re: Postres dilemma Joshua D. Drake (02:58)
• Re: Postres dilemma Tom Lane (03:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] CREATE DATABASE on the heap with PostgreSQL? jihuang (04:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Thomas Hallgren (06:20)
• Re: Why hash indexes suck Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD (08:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] CREATE DATABASE on the heap with PostgreSQL? Gaetano Mendola (09:09)
• Re: serverlog function Andreas Pflug (09:23)
• Re: Postres dilemma Gaetano Mendola (09:25)
• Re: CREATE DATABASE on the heap with PostgreSQL? Albretch (10:34)
• Failures with windows port Shridhar Daithankar (10:56)
• Re: serverlog function (log_destination file) Andreas Pflug (11:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] Slony-I goes BETA (possible bug) Jan Wieck (13:20)
• Re: Failures with windows port Andrew Dunstan (13:26)
• Re: serverlog function (log_destination file) Tom Lane (13:30)
• Re: serverlog function Bruce Momjian (13:39)
• Re: serverlog function (log_destination file) Dave Page (13:44)
• Re: serverlog function (log_destination file) Andrew Dunstan (13:48)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port Shridhar Daithankar (13:57)
• Re: serverlog function Andreas Pflug (14:06)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port Bruce Momjian (14:07)
• Re: serverlog function (log_destination file) Tom Lane (14:31)
• Re: serverlog function Bruno Wolff III (14:34)
• Re: serverlog function (log_destination file) Dave Page (14:46)
• Re: serverlog function (log_destination file) Andreas Pflug (14:52)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port Shridhar Daithankar (14:52)
• Re: serverlog function (log_destination file) Tom Lane (14:55)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port Bruce Momjian (14:59)
• Re: serverlog function (log_destination file) Tom Lane (15:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] CREATE DATABASE on the heap with PostgreSQL? Maarten Boekhold (15:04)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port Shridhar Daithankar (15:13)
• Re: Case preserving - suggestions Robert Treat (15:24)
• Re: Case preserving - suggestions Shachar Shemesh (15:39)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port Andrew Dunstan (15:42)
• Re: serverlog function (log_destination file) Andreas Pflug (15:47)
• Re: Case preserving - suggestions Andrew Dunstan (15:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] CREATE DATABASE on the heap with PostgreSQL? Tom Lane (15:50)
• Re: serverlog function Bort, Paul (15:54)
• Re: serverlog function (log_destination file) Magnus Hagander (16:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Failures with windows port Jochem van Dieten (16:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Failures with windows port Bruce Momjian (16:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Failures with windows port Andrew Dunstan (17:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] Slony-I goes BETA (possible bug) Jeff Davis (18:33)
• Tool to read data files Mario Weilguni (19:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Slony-I goes BETA (possible bug) Chris Browne (20:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] dynamic_library_path on Win32 Thomas Hallgren (22:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems Bruce Momjian (22:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems Tom Lane (22:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems Bruce Momjian (22:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems Tom Lane (23:00)

June 8, 2004

• Re: CREATE DATABASE on the heap with PostgreSQL? Chris Travers (00:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] CVS tip problems Bruce Momjian (01:46)
• vacuumdb: vacuuming of database "testdonors" failed: ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size 3221225472 Joshua D. Drake (02:18)
• sequences and "addval('myseq', value)" pgsql (03:32)
• Re: vacuumdb: vacuuming of database "testdonors" failed: pgsql (03:36)
• Re: Tool to read data files Tom Lane (04:45)
• Re: vacuumdb: vacuuming of database "testdonors" failed: ERROR: invalid memory alloc request size 3221225472 Tom Lane (05:58)
• Re: sequences and "addval('myseq', value)" Tom Lane (06:00)
• MinGW, psql, and readline Thomas Hallgren (07:23)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port Shridhar Daithankar (07:33)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port Dave Page (07:45)
• Question regarding dynamic_library_path Thomas Hallgren (08:21)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port Magnus Hagander (08:27)
• Re: sequences and "addval('myseq', value)" pgsql (11:39)
• Re: Slony-I goes BETA (possible bug) Jan Wieck (12:34)
• Re: [GENERAL] The pgreplication project Jan Wieck (12:46)
• Re: sequences and "addval('myseq', value)" Tom Lane (13:35)
• Re: Question regarding dynamic_library_path Bruce Momjian (13:51)
• cvs head : broken regression tests ? Fabien COELHO (13:53)
• Re: cvs head : broken regression tests ? Bruce Momjian (14:07)
• Re: sequences and "addval('myseq', value)" pgsql (14:18)
• Re: sequences and "addval('myseq', value)" Tom Lane (14:21)
• Re: Question regarding dynamic_library_path Andrew Dunstan (14:32)
• Re: Question regarding dynamic_library_path Tom Lane (14:37)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port Bruce Momjian (14:37)
• Re: sequences and "addval('myseq', value)" Bruno Wolff III (14:45)
• Re: cvs head : broken regression tests ? Tom Lane (14:46)
• Re: sequences and "addval('myseq', value)" Christopher Browne (14:53)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Failures with windows port Andrew Dunstan (14:57)