Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2003-11-18 00:00

2003-11-18

• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (00:24)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Marc G. Fournier (00:37)
• Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut (00:44)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (00:47)
• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*)) Bruce Momjian (00:52)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (00:58)
• Re: Release now live ... Bruce Momjian (00:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Mike Mascari (00:59)
• Re: Release cycle length Neil Conway (01:08)
• Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut (01:12)
• Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut (01:21)
• Re: logical column position Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:24)
• help! Larry Rosenman (01:36)
• Re: logical column position Bruce Momjian (01:39)
• Re: logical column position Bruce Momjian (01:40)
• Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:46)
• Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:48)
• Re: help! Larry Rosenman (01:52)
• Re: Release cycle length Joshua D. Drake (01:58)
• Re: help! Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:59)
• Re: help! Larry Rosenman (02:01)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christopher Browne (02:20)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (02:22)
• Re: Release cycle length Doug McNaught (02:26)
• Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:32)
• Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut (02:33)
• Re: Release cycle length Neil Conway (02:33)
• Re: libpq thread safety Bruce Momjian (02:35)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Bruce Momjian (02:41)
• Re: logical column position Rod Taylor (02:45)
• Re: Release cycle length Matthew T. O'Connor (02:49)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (03:00)
• Re: logical column position Peter Eisentraut (03:02)
• Re: Release cycle length Neil Conway (03:10)
• Re: logical column position Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:10)
• Re: logical column position Stephan Szabo (03:15)
• Re: Release cycle length Kevin Brown (03:21)
• Re: Release cycle length Kevin Brown (03:26)
• Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:32)
• Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut (03:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (03:46)
• Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:58)
• Re: Release cycle length Larry Rosenman (04:07)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (04:36)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (04:36)
• So as not to break it for anyone ... Marc G. Fournier (04:41)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Greg Stark (05:21)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christopher Kings-Lynne (05:36)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Matthew T. O'Connor (05:52)
• Re: Release cycle length Neil Conway (05:53)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (06:00)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut (06:04)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Markus Bertheau (06:11)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Greg Stark (06:12)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit (06:18)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut (06:34)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? ow (06:39)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit (06:39)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan (06:42)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit (06:52)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan (06:56)
• Re: Release cycle length elein (06:57)
• Re: Background writer process Shridhar Daithankar (06:59)
• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*)) Tom Lane (07:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Hans-Jürgen Schönig (07:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length Andreas Grabmller (08:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dave Page (08:22)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut (09:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut (09:22)
• Re: Background writer process Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD (09:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dave Page (09:45)
• Re: Release cycle length Oliver Elphick (10:02)
• What's the difference between int2 and int16? William ZHANG (10:03)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christoph Haller (10:20)
• Re: Release cycle length Sean Chittenden (10:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Shachar Shemesh (11:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Shachar Shemesh (11:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Marek Lewczuk (12:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Claudio Natoli (12:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length Michael Glaesemann (12:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan (12:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Marek Lewczuk (13:00)
• Re: Release cycle length Bruno Wolff III (13:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Claudio Natoli (13:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length Andreas Grabmller (13:32)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Jean-Michel POURE (13:32)
• Re: Release cycle length Tommi Maekitalo (13:33)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Robert Treat (13:39)
• Re: logical column position Dave Cramer (13:40)
• Re: Release cycle length Alvaro Herrera (13:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Claudio Natoli (14:34)
• Re: logical column position Bruce Momjian (14:43)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Marek Lewczuk (14:43)
• Re: Release cycle length Bruce Momjian (14:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Bruce Momjian (15:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Claudio Natoli (15:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Bruce Momjian (15:18)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan (15:54)
• Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the near future??? Christoper Smiga (16:05)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the near future??? Christopher Browne (16:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Marc G. Fournier (16:37)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? ow (16:39)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Rocco Altier (16:51)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan (17:13)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? ow (17:15)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Josh Berkus (17:15)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Sullivan (17:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Port WAS: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Josh Berkus (17:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Port WAS: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Sullivan (17:34)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Reinoud van Leeuwen (17:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length Josh Berkus (17:42)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the near future??? Andrew Rawnsley (17:43)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christopher Browne (17:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Port WAS: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Cornelia Boenigk (18:01)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Sailesh Krishnamurthy (18:07)
• Re: [pgsql-www] Release cycle length Alvaro Herrera (18:17)
• Re: [pgsql-www] Release cycle length Andrew Dunstan (18:48)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit (18:58)
• Re: [pgsql-www] Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (19:13)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? ow (19:22)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit (19:31)
• Sponsoring enterprise features James Rogers (19:33)
• Build farm Andrew Dunstan (19:36)
• Re: Sponsoring enterprise features Josh Berkus (19:45)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Bruce Momjian (19:58)
• Re: Sponsoring enterprise features Rod Taylor (20:26)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Robert Treat (21:28)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Mike Mascari (21:50)
• Re: Build farm Robert Treat (22:12)
• Commercial binary support? Austin Gonyou (22:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Nick Fankhauser (22:24)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Sailesh Krishnamurthy (22:31)
• More detail on settings for pgavd? Josh Berkus (23:58)

2003-11-19

• Comment on pg_catalog and information_schema objects Tom Hebbron (00:51)
• Re: Build farm Bruce Momjian (01:09)
• Re: logical column position Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (01:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:56)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:00)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Sailesh Krishnamurthy (02:32)
• 7.4: CHAR padding inconsistency Troels Arvin (02:55)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Alvaro Herrera (04:53)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Greg Stark (06:07)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Greg Stark (06:22)
• Re: More detail on settings for pgavd? Shridhar Daithankar (06:32)
• Re: Build farm Peter Eisentraut (09:11)
• Win32 port Jean-Michel POURE (09:42)
• Re: Win32 port Shridhar Daithankar (10:29)
• PG7.4 ordering operator strk (10:44)
• ECPG: "EXEC SQL CREATE SCHEMA foo" Broken Lee Kindness (11:02)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Sailesh Krishnamurthy (11:17)
• initdb segfaults - latest cvs strk (12:35)
• Re: Build farm Andrew Dunstan (12:59)
• Re: ECPG: "EXEC SQL CREATE SCHEMA foo" Broken Michael Meskes (13:20)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Robert Treat (13:43)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Mike Mascari (14:07)
• Re: More detail on settings for pgavd? Shridhar Daithankar (14:10)
• Re: Commercial binary support? Robert Treat (14:22)
• Re: Release cycle length Jan Wieck (14:33)
• Re: initdb segfaults - latest cvs Andrew Dunstan (14:47)
• Re: Commercial binary support? Hans-Jürgen Schönig (15:01)
• Re: Commercial binary support? Michael Meskes (15:18)
• Re: Build farm Peter Eisentraut (15:34)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 Justin Clift (15:43)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Jan Wieck (15:45)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Sailesh Krishnamurthy (15:47)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 Christoper Smiga (15:49)
• Re: More detail on settings for pgavd? Josh Berkus (16:00)
• Re: A big thanks to SuSE Lamar Owen (16:07)
• Re: Background writer process Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD (16:08)
• question about fixes in v7.4... Don Sceifers (16:17)
• Background writer committed Jan Wieck (16:23)
• Re: ECPG: "EXEC SQL CREATE SCHEMA foo" Broken Bruce Momjian (16:39)
• Re: A big thanks to SuSE Peter Eisentraut (17:02)
• Re: More detail on settings for pgavd? Josh Berkus (17:06)
• Re: A big thanks to SuSE Lamar Owen (17:15)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Sailesh Krishnamurthy (17:16)
• Re: Build farm Andrew Dunstan (17:18)
• Re: logical column position Andreas Pflug (17:30)
• Re: Commercial binary support? Marc G. Fournier (17:31)
• unsubscribe John Liu (17:34)
• Re: Background writer committed Bruce Momjian (17:36)
• Re: logical column position Dave Cramer (17:37)
• Re: A big thanks to SuSE Bruce Momjian (17:39)
• Re: initdb segfaults - latest cvs strk (17:41)
• Re: logical column position Andreas Pflug (18:07)
• Re: logical column position Dave Cramer (18:11)
• Re: Build farm Peter Eisentraut (18:18)
• Re: logical column position Andreas Pflug (18:45)
• Re: Commercial binary support? Austin Gonyou (18:48)
• Re: Commercial binary support? Bruce Momjian (18:56)
• Re: Reentrant Locale API Mark Butler (19:00)
• Re: Commercial binary support? Nigel J. Andrews (19:10)
• Re: Build farm Andrew Dunstan (19:27)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Robert Treat (19:35)
• Re: 7.4: CHAR padding inconsistency Bruce Momjian (19:50)
• Re: Commercial binary support? Hans-Jürgen Schönig (19:57)
• Re: question about fixes in v7.4... Rod Taylor (20:01)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Kurt Roeckx (20:07)
• Re: Commercial binary support? Joshua D. Drake (20:09)