Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2003-11-16 00:00

2003-11-16

• Re: bufmgr code question Neil Conway (00:58)
• source version? bpalmer (01:36)
• Re: oh dear ... Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:50)
• Re: source version? Neil Conway (02:18)
• SRA Win32 sync() code Bruce Momjian (05:00)
• Re: oh dear ... Joe Conway (05:27)
• Defaut database encoding Jean-Michel POURE (11:03)
• start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*)) Hannu Krosing (11:58)
• Re: ALTER TABLE modifications Hannu Krosing (14:10)
• Re: [PATCHES] ALTER TABLE modifications Rod Taylor (14:37)
• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*)) Tom Lane (14:50)
• Re: Help with count(*) Tom Lane (15:22)
• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with Dennis Bjorklund (15:51)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Tom Lane (16:32)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Bruce Momjian (16:36)
• Re: cvs head? initdb? Jan Wieck (16:46)
• Re: cvs head? initdb? Jan Wieck (16:53)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Tom Lane (16:58)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Manfred Spraul (17:19)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Tom Lane (17:29)
• interesting SIGNAL 10 (BUSERR) on CVS Larry Rosenman (17:38)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Andrew Dunstan (17:38)
• Re: cvs head? initdb? Bruce Momjian (17:57)
• Re: interesting SIGNAL 10 (BUSERR) on CVS Tom Lane (17:59)
• Re: interesting SIGNAL 10 (BUSERR) on CVS Larry Rosenman (18:01)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Bruce Momjian (18:06)
• Re: interesting SIGNAL 10 (BUSERR) on CVS Tom Lane (18:15)
• Re: interesting SIGNAL 10 (BUSERR) on CVS Larry Rosenman (18:17)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Tom Lane (18:21)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Jan Wieck (20:00)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Tom Lane (20:17)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Jan Wieck (20:43)
• Bittorrent test David Fetter (21:13)
• We're finally there ... Marc G. Fournier (22:13)
• Re: We're finally there ... bpalmer (22:25)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Tom Lane (22:46)
• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*)) Neil Conway (22:55)
• start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*)) Neil Conway (23:18)

2003-11-17

• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*)) Tom Lane (00:08)
• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*)) Bruce Momjian (00:31)
• Release now live ... Marc G. Fournier (01:23)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Bruce Momjian (01:58)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Tom Lane (03:25)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Bruce Momjian (04:33)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Bruce Momjian (05:46)
• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*)) Greg Stark (06:11)
• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with Stephan Szabo (07:09)
• Re: Need help. Petro Pelekh (07:55)
• Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] SRA Win32 sync() code Shridhar Daithankar (08:15)
• Re: Background writer process Shridhar Daithankar (08:33)
• Re: Release now live ... Tommi Maekitalo (09:52)
• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with Hannu Krosing (10:16)
• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with Hannu Krosing (10:19)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Hannu Krosing (10:28)
• Re: start of transaction Shridhar Daithankar (10:43)
• Re: Background writer process Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD (11:15)
• Re: Background writer process Shridhar Daithankar (11:58)
• commenting on polymorphic aggregates possible? Christopher Kings-Lynne (14:34)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Bruce Momjian (15:32)
• Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code Bruce Momjian (15:33)
• 7.4 make failure on OSX Adam Witney (16:29)
• logical column position Neil Conway (16:48)
• logical column position Neil Conway (16:49)
• Re: 7.4 make failure on OSX ... Please ignore Adam Witney (16:59)
• Re: logical column position Peter Eisentraut (17:07)
• Re: logical column position Jon Jensen (17:13)
• Re: logical column position Neil Conway (18:27)
• Re: logical column position Neil Conway (18:34)
• Connexions question ohp (19:21)
• 4 Clause license? Rod Taylor (19:48)
• Re: Connexions question Dann Corbit (19:51)
• Re: Connexions question Dann Corbit (19:53)
• Re: Connexions question Andrew Dunstan (19:59)
• Re: 4 Clause license? Simon L. Nielsen (20:04)
• Re: 4 Clause license? Alexander Kabaev (20:05)
• Optimizer optimizer may be worth a look-see Dann Corbit (20:11)
• Re: 4 Clause license? Erik Trulsson (20:21)
• libpq thread safety Manfred Spraul (21:55)
• A big thanks to SuSE Daniele Orlandi (22:28)
• Re: OSDL DBT-2 w/ PostgreSQL 7.3.4 and 7.4beta5 Mark Wong (23:04)
• Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Josh Berkus (23:10)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Neil Conway (23:26)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut (23:31)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Josh Berkus (23:35)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? William Yu (23:43)
• Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut (23:46)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Joshua D. Drake (23:46)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Joshua D. Drake (23:50)
• Re: Background writer process Bruce Momjian (23:53)

2003-11-18

• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (00:24)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Marc G. Fournier (00:37)
• Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut (00:44)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (00:47)
• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*)) Bruce Momjian (00:52)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (00:58)
• Re: Release now live ... Bruce Momjian (00:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Mike Mascari (00:59)
• Re: Release cycle length Neil Conway (01:08)
• Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut (01:12)
• Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut (01:21)
• Re: logical column position Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:24)
• help! Larry Rosenman (01:36)
• Re: logical column position Bruce Momjian (01:39)
• Re: logical column position Bruce Momjian (01:40)
• Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:46)
• Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:48)
• Re: help! Larry Rosenman (01:52)
• Re: Release cycle length Joshua D. Drake (01:58)
• Re: help! Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:59)
• Re: help! Larry Rosenman (02:01)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christopher Browne (02:20)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (02:22)
• Re: Release cycle length Doug McNaught (02:26)
• Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:32)
• Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut (02:33)
• Re: Release cycle length Neil Conway (02:33)
• Re: libpq thread safety Bruce Momjian (02:35)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Bruce Momjian (02:41)
• Re: logical column position Rod Taylor (02:45)
• Re: Release cycle length Matthew T. O'Connor (02:49)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (03:00)
• Re: logical column position Peter Eisentraut (03:02)
• Re: Release cycle length Neil Conway (03:10)
• Re: logical column position Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:10)
• Re: logical column position Stephan Szabo (03:15)
• Re: Release cycle length Kevin Brown (03:21)
• Re: Release cycle length Kevin Brown (03:26)
• Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:32)
• Re: Release cycle length Peter Eisentraut (03:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (03:46)
• Re: Release cycle length Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:58)
• Re: Release cycle length Larry Rosenman (04:07)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (04:36)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (04:36)
• So as not to break it for anyone ... Marc G. Fournier (04:41)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Greg Stark (05:21)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christopher Kings-Lynne (05:36)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Matthew T. O'Connor (05:52)
• Re: Release cycle length Neil Conway (05:53)
• Re: Release cycle length Marc G. Fournier (06:00)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut (06:04)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Markus Bertheau (06:11)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Greg Stark (06:12)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit (06:18)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut (06:34)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? ow (06:39)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit (06:39)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan (06:42)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dann Corbit (06:52)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan (06:56)
• Re: Release cycle length elein (06:57)
• Re: Background writer process Shridhar Daithankar (06:59)
• Re: start of transaction (was: Re: [PERFORM] Help with count(*)) Tom Lane (07:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Hans-Jürgen Schönig (07:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length Andreas Grabmller (08:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dave Page (08:22)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut (09:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Peter Eisentraut (09:22)
• Re: Background writer process Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD (09:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Dave Page (09:45)
• Re: Release cycle length Oliver Elphick (10:02)
• What's the difference between int2 and int16? William ZHANG (10:03)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christoph Haller (10:20)
• Re: Release cycle length Sean Chittenden (10:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Shachar Shemesh (11:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Shachar Shemesh (11:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Marek Lewczuk (12:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Claudio Natoli (12:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length Michael Glaesemann (12:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan (12:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Marek Lewczuk (13:00)
• Re: Release cycle length Bruno Wolff III (13:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Claudio Natoli (13:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length Andreas Grabmller (13:32)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Jean-Michel POURE (13:32)
• Re: Release cycle length Tommi Maekitalo (13:33)
• Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Robert Treat (13:39)
• Re: logical column position Dave Cramer (13:40)
• Re: Release cycle length Alvaro Herrera (13:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Claudio Natoli (14:34)
• Re: logical column position Bruce Momjian (14:43)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Marek Lewczuk (14:43)
• Re: Release cycle length Bruce Momjian (14:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Bruce Momjian (15:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Claudio Natoli (15:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Bruce Momjian (15:18)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan (15:54)
• Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the near future??? Christoper Smiga (16:05)
• Re: Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the near future??? Christopher Browne (16:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Is there going to be a port to Solaris 9 x86 in the Marc G. Fournier (16:37)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? ow (16:39)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Rocco Altier (16:51)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Dunstan (17:13)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? ow (17:15)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Josh Berkus (17:15)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Sullivan (17:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Port WAS: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Josh Berkus (17:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Win32 Port WAS: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Andrew Sullivan (17:34)
• Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Reinoud van Leeuwen (17:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length Josh Berkus (17:42)