Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 2003-10-18 00:00

2003-10-18

• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Bob Badour (00:22)
• *sigh* Thomas Zehetbauer (01:15)
• Re: Vacuum thoughts Tom Lane (04:37)
• Re: Error with views containing sub-queries with distinct Tom Lane (05:17)
• Re: Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types Jean-Paul ARGUDO (08:23)
• pgsql-server/src/backend/catalog information_s ... Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL (12:53)
• Re: Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types Jean-Michel POURE (13:11)
• Is there a reason why no table OID in pg_tables Richard Huxton (15:07)
• Re: Is there a reason why no table OID in pg_tables Tom Lane (15:32)
• Re: Is there a reason why no table OID in pg_tables Richard Huxton (16:16)
• Re: Error with views containing sub-queries with distinct Tom Lane (16:54)
• Re: PostgreSQL on Novell Netware 6.5. Andrew Dunstan (17:17)
• Re: *sigh* Peter Eisentraut (17:45)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src/backend/catalog information_s ... Tom Lane (19:07)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Oliver Elphick (21:24)
• pgsql-server/src backend/main/main.c backend/t ... Peter Eisentraut - PostgreSQL (22:59)

2003-10-19

• Re: *sigh* Greg Stark (07:27)
• Debian bug report about multibyte in 7.3.3 Michael Meskes (14:47)
• Re: Debian bug report about multibyte in 7.3.3 Tom Lane (16:09)
• Re: *sigh* Joshua D. Drake (17:00)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Anthony W. Youngman (18:24)
• Re: *sigh* Greg Stark (18:59)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Josh Berkus (19:24)
• Re: Vacuum thoughts Gaetano Mendola (19:30)
• Re: PostgreSQL on Novell Netware 6.5. Terry Yapt (19:32)
• prioritize TODO list? Andrew Dunstan (20:31)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Lauri Pietarinen (20:49)
• Re: Debian bug report about multibyte in 7.3.3 Oliver Elphick (21:21)
• Unicode upper() bug still present Oliver Elphick (23:55)

2003-10-20

• libpq shared library version number needs a bump Tom Lane (00:16)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Sailesh Krishnamurthy (00:29)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Tom Lane (00:35)
• A couple of TODO notes Tom Lane (01:12)
• Re: A couple of TODO notes Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:55)
• Re: A couple of TODO notes Tom Lane (02:12)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Christopher Browne (02:47)
• Re: Vacuum thoughts Shridhar Daithankar (05:08)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Josh Berkus (05:19)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Sailesh Krishnamurthy (05:26)
• Re: A couple of TODO notes Peter Eisentraut (05:29)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Hannu Krosing (07:22)
• Can't not load libpq.so.3 Fabien DAUMEN (08:12)
• pg_dump problems against 7.0 Christopher Kings-Lynne (08:27)
• Re: Debian bug report about multibyte in 7.3.3 Michael Meskes (08:42)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Paul Vernon (12:05)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Tatsuo Ishii (12:37)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Hannu Krosing (12:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types Robert Treat (12:52)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Tom Lane (13:05)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Tom Lane (13:18)
• In-doubt window Jeroen T. Vermeulen (13:35)
• Re: PostgreSQL on Novell Netware 6.5. Eduardo D Piovesam (13:35)
• Re: Vacuum thoughts Tom Lane (13:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types Jean-Michel POURE (13:55)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Christopher Browne (14:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL Bruno LEVEQUE (15:22)
• Re: Vacuum thoughts Shridhar Daithankar (15:23)
• Re: Vacuum thoughts Greg Stark (15:48)
• Re: Vacuum thoughts Tom Lane (15:57)
• Looks like we'll have a beta5 ... Marc G. Fournier (16:13)
• Re: In-doubt window Tom Lane (16:18)
• Re: Vacuum thoughts Greg Stark (16:25)
• Re: In-doubt window Jeroen T. Vermeulen (16:59)
• Re: Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL Josh Berkus (17:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types Jean-Michel POURE (17:28)
• Re: In-doubt window Tom Lane (17:35)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Dennis Bjorklund (18:00)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Peter Eisentraut (18:02)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Hannu Krosing (18:12)
• how to put passwd ? ivan (18:56)
• Re: In-doubt window Jeroen T. Vermeulen (18:58)
• Broken links in postgreSQL.org ads Stephen (19:00)
• Re: how to put passwd ? Alvaro Herrera (19:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Writers Wanted Hans-Jürgen Schönig (19:02)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Tom Lane (19:30)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Tom Lane (19:37)
• Re: In-doubt window Tom Lane (19:39)
• Re: In-doubt window Jeroen T. Vermeulen (19:44)
• Re: Vacuum thoughts Christopher Browne (19:54)
• Re: In-doubt window Tom Lane (19:56)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Anthony W. Youngman (20:44)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Anthony W. Youngman (20:50)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Peter Eisentraut (20:58)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Tom Lane (21:15)
• Re: Vacuum thoughts Tom Lane (21:31)
• So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Tom Lane (21:35)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Peter Eisentraut (22:09)

2003-10-21

• Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ... Christopher Kings-Lynne (00:38)
• Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ... Tom Lane (00:43)
• multi-backend psql Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:26)
• Re: multi-backend psql Alvaro Herrera (01:34)
• Re: multi-backend psql Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:45)
• Re: multi-backend psql Matthew T. O'Connor (02:25)
• Re: multi-backend psql Rod Taylor (02:29)
• Re: libpq shared library version number needs a bump Bruce Momjian (02:38)
• Re: multi-backend psql Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:39)
• Re: A couple of TODO notes Bruce Momjian (02:48)
• Re: pg_autovacuum and VACUUM FREEZE Christopher Browne (02:54)
• Re: multi-backend psql Rod Taylor (03:00)
• Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ... Bruce Momjian (03:13)
• Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ... Bruce Momjian (03:13)
• Re: multi-backend psql Christopher Kings-Lynne (03:15)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Bruce Momjian (03:16)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src backend/main/main.c backend/t ... Bruce Momjian (03:18)
• Re: A couple of TODO notes Tom Lane (03:42)
• Re: A couple of TODO notes Bruce Momjian (04:04)
• Re: multi-backend psql Tom Lane (04:08)
• Re: A couple of TODO notes Tom Lane (04:13)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Marc G. Fournier (04:16)
• Re: multi-backend psql Rod Taylor (04:25)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Tom Lane (04:37)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src backend/main/main.c backend/t ... Tom Lane (04:51)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Lauri Pietarinen (04:57)
• obj_description problems? Christopher Kings-Lynne (05:20)
• Re: obj_description problems? Christopher Kings-Lynne (05:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? Christopher Kings-Lynne (05:51)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Karel Zak (07:50)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Hannu Krosing (08:44)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Tatsuo Ishii (09:07)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Hannu Krosing (09:27)
• Re: Unicode upper() bug still present Tatsuo Ishii (09:30)
• Re: 2-phase commit Heikki Linnakangas (10:58)
• is GiST still alive? Gregor Zeitlinger (12:46)
• Re: multi-backend psql Rod Taylor (12:52)
• Re: multi-backend psql Andreas Pflug (13:03)
• Re: multi-backend psql Rod Taylor (13:21)
• Re: multi-backend psql Andreas Pflug (13:33)
• Re: multi-backend psql Rod Taylor (13:48)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Bob Badour (14:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? Tom Lane (14:13)
• Complex/elaborate user-defined base types Jean-Henry Berevoescu (14:19)
• Automatic conversion from Unicode Michael Brusser (14:50)
• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/src backend/main/main.c backend/t Bruce Momjian (15:23)
• Re: Automatic conversion from Unicode Tom Lane (15:45)
• Re: A couple of TODO notes Bruce Momjian (15:51)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Bruce Momjian (15:55)
• suspicius behaviour during delete Yann Michel (16:06)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Tom Lane (16:13)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Peter Eisentraut (16:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? Tom Lane (16:27)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Tom Lane (16:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types Bruce Momjian (18:25)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Lauri Pietarinen (18:28)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Dann Corbit (18:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL Justin Clift (18:56)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Hannu Krosing (19:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types Bruce Momjian (19:50)
• Help!!! FreeSpaceMap hashtalble out of memory. Yurgis Baykshtis (19:56)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Bob Badour (20:10)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Lauri Pietarinen (20:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL scott.marlowe (20:46)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Anthony W. Youngman (20:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL Josh Berkus (21:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL Robert Treat (21:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL types Bruce Momjian (22:22)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Lauri Pietarinen (22:34)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Bob Badour (22:52)

2003-10-22

• Re: [HACKERS] Mapping Oracle types to PostgreSQL Justin Clift (00:41)
• Re: multi-backend psql Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:24)
• Re: multi-backend psql Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:27)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:34)
• Re: Dreaming About Redesigning SQL Mike Preece (01:39)
• -:-about the nls files Hemanthakumar R Dondolu (02:06)
• 7.4 compatibility question Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:21)
• Re: multi-backend psql Rod Taylor (02:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? Tom Lane (02:49)
• Re: 7.4 compatibility question Tom Lane (04:03)
• Re: 7.4 compatibility question Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:18)
• Re: 7.4 compatibility question Tom Lane (04:21)
• Re: 7.4 compatibility question Bruce Momjian (04:31)
• Re: 7.4 compatibility question Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:41)
• Re: 7.4 compatibility question Tom Lane (04:42)
• Re: 7.4 compatibility question Neil Conway (04:42)
• Re: 7.4 compatibility question Christopher Kings-Lynne (04:50)
• Re: 7.4 compatibility question Bruce Momjian (05:00)
• Re: 7.4 compatibility question Bruce Momjian (05:08)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Peter Eisentraut (05:55)
• Re: 7.4 compatibility question Neil Conway (06:37)
• Timestamp docs weirdness Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:21)
• Re: [HACKERS] obj_description problems? Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:39)
• integer ceiling in LIMIT and OFFSET Christopher Kings-Lynne (08:01)
• Re: Timestamp docs weirdness Peter Eisentraut (08:12)
• help dedy setiawan (08:14)
• Re: Timestamp docs weirdness Christopher Kings-Lynne (08:21)
• Re: Timestamp docs weirdness Marcus Brger (08:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp docs weirdness Christopher Kings-Lynne (09:07)
• Re: Timestamp docs weirdness Christopher Kings-Lynne (09:26)
• Automatic compat checking? (was 7.4 compatibility question) Richard Huxton (09:30)
• round() function wrong? Jochen Westland [invigo] (09:47)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Richard Huxton (10:55)
• Re: integer ceiling in LIMIT and OFFSET Rod Taylor (12:34)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Tom Lane (13:28)
• Re: integer ceiling in LIMIT and OFFSET Tom Lane (13:44)
• Re: Timestamp docs weirdness Tom Lane (13:53)
• Re: So, are we going to bump catversion for beta5, or not? Robert Treat (14:01)
• Last beta ... we hope? Marc G. Fournier (14:21)
• Re: integer ceiling in LIMIT and OFFSET Christopher Kings-Lynne (14:22)
• Re: integer ceiling in LIMIT and OFFSET Stephan Szabo (14:57)