Skip site navigation
(1)
Skip section navigation
(2)
Search
Peripheral Links
Text Size:
Normal
/
Large
Donate
Contact
Home
About
Download
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Your account
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
User lists
Developer lists
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-hackers
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-www
Regional lists
Associations
User groups
Project lists
Inactive lists
IRC
Featured Users
International Sites
Propaganda
Resources
Weekly News
pgsql-hackers since 2000-12-22 00:00
Search archives
(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search
Prev
|
Next
Jump to day:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
2000-12-22
Re: TOAST-table vacuuming (was Re: Idea for reducing pl anning time)
Tom Lane (01:10)
RE: Inline Comments for pg_dump
Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:14)
RE: (7.1) BIT datatype
Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:18)
Re: (7.1) BIT datatype
Oliver Elphick (07:15)
Re: Re: [PATCHES] A Patch for MIC to EUC_TW code converting inmbsupport
Tatsuo Ishii (08:10)
RE: Status of JDBC Interface
Peter Mount (09:07)
RE: RE: SSL Connections [doc PATCH]
Magnus Hagander (11:09)
Merry X-Mass
Partyka Robert (13:41)
Re: [HACKERS] Merry X-Mass
Rod Taylor (13:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Merry X-Mass
Partyka Robert (15:15)
Re: Re: [HACKERS] Merry X-Mass
Adam Lang (15:30)
RI problem with inherited table
Oliver Elphick (17:20)
Re: RI problem with inherited table
Tom Lane (17:52)
Inheritance is a security loophole!
Tom Lane (19:00)
as i work BLOB's from PostODBC
Wilderman Ceren (19:12)
7.0.3: order by func in union
Mikheev, Vadim (19:36)
Re: Inheritance is a security loophole!
Bruce Momjian (20:01)
7.1current: order by func in union
Mikheev, Vadim (20:14)
Re: 7.1current: order by func in union
Tom Lane (21:53)
GEQO status?
Ed Loehr (22:46)
Re: GEQO status?
Tom Lane (23:08)
Re: GEQO status?
Ed Loehr (23:10)
Re: GEQO status?
Thomas Lockhart (23:14)
Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs
Yusuf Goolamabbas (23:30)
Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs
Alfred Perlstein (23:36)
Re: GEQO status?
Ed Loehr (23:39)
Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs
Yusuf Goolamabbas (23:46)
Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs
Alfred Perlstein (23:48)
Re: GEQO status?
Ed Loehr (23:53)
Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs
Tom Lane (23:54)
2000-12-23
Re: GEQO status?
Tom Lane (00:04)
Re: Unable to check out REL7_1 via cvs
Peter Eisentraut (00:11)
Re: GEQO status?
Peter Eisentraut (00:30)
Re: Isn't init_irels() dangerous ?
Tom Lane (00:37)
Re: GEQO status?
Tom Lane (00:51)
Re: GEQO status?
Tom Lane (01:00)
Re: GEQO status?
Ed Loehr (01:04)
7.1 on DEC/Alpha
Brent Verner (01:27)
Considerations for running current cvs pgsql and pgsql release on same machine?
Robert B. Easter (02:48)
Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha
Brent Verner (02:58)
Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha
Brent Verner (03:02)
Re: Considerations for running current cvs pgsql and pgsql release on same machine?
Tom Lane (03:05)
Re: Considerations for running current cvs pgsql and pgsql release on same machine?
Robert B. Easter (07:45)
GNU readline and BSD license
Bruce Momjian (14:56)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Bruce Momjian (15:44)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Peter Eisentraut (15:46)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Alex Pilosov (15:52)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Bruce Momjian (15:54)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Alex Pilosov (16:06)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
mlw (16:20)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Alfred Perlstein (16:42)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Bruce Momjian (16:48)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Fabrice Scemama (17:09)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Tom Lane (17:10)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Bruce Momjian (17:14)
how do i store \0 inside a text attribute?
Paul A Vixie (18:59)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Patrick Welche (19:42)
Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
Tom Lane (22:11)
Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
mlw (22:38)
Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
Peter Eisentraut (23:06)
Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
Tom Lane (23:12)
Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
Tom Lane (23:42)
Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
Peter Eisentraut (23:42)
2000-12-24
Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
Bruce Momjian (00:05)
Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
Alfred Perlstein (00:24)
Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
Tatsuo Ishii (02:42)
Java and Postgresql
Mike S. Avelar (03:13)
Re: Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)
Tom Lane (03:58)
Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha
Brent Verner (04:49)
Re: Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha
Tom Lane (06:00)
Re: Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha
Brent Verner (06:13)
Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha
Tom Lane (06:19)
NULLS and <> : Discrepancies ?
Emmanuel Charpentier,,, (07:57)
Re: RI problem with inherited table (fwd)
Oliver Elphick (13:23)
Upper limit on number of buffers?
mlw (18:52)
Re: Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha
Brent Verner (20:14)
Thoughts regarding pg_dump
Rod Taylor (22:00)
2000-12-25
Re: Upper limit on number of buffers?
Alfred Perlstein (03:04)
Re: Upper limit on number of buffers?
Joe Conway (03:25)
Re: Upper limit on number of buffers?
Joe Conway (04:20)
Re: Upper limit on number of buffers?
Oleg Bartunov (04:47)
COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!!
Abe (23:12)
Re: COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!!
mlw (23:23)
Re: Upper limit on number of buffers?
mlw (23:26)
2000-12-26
Re: COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!!
Stephan Szabo (01:27)
Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha
Brent Verner (02:01)
Re: COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!!
GH (02:08)
Re: COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!!
mlw (02:39)
Re: COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!!
Abe (02:41)
Re: COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!!
Anand Raman (06:43)
Re: COUNT(Distinct city) HELP!!!
Abe (12:14)
Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Tom Lane (16:26)
Permissions on Stored Procedures
jmoschet (17:24)
Re: Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Thomas Lockhart (18:08)
Re: Re: GNU readline and BSD license
mlw (18:12)
Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Tom Lane (19:41)
Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Brent Verner (20:47)
Inheritance docs error.
Paul Govereau (21:52)
Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Brent Verner (23:03)
2000-12-27
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Tom Lane (04:41)
Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Brent Verner (05:28)
PHP and PostgreSQL
Bruce Momjian (05:56)
AW: GEQO status?
Zeugswetter Andreas SB (08:57)
Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Brent Verner (09:06)
AW: Inheritance is a security loophole!
Zeugswetter Andreas SB (09:38)
configure in snapshout == configure.in
Zeugswetter Andreas SB (10:03)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Brent Verner (11:29)
About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING"
Chih-Chang Hsieh (11:55)
RE: GEQO status?
Andrew Snow (11:59)
Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
mlw (13:46)
Re: GEQO status?
Andrew Snow (13:49)
RE: [HACKERS] PHP and PostgreSQL
Matthew (13:54)
Re: (7.1) BIT datatype
Adriaan Joubert (14:11)
Re: RE: [HACKERS] PHP and PostgreSQL
Adam Lang (14:14)
Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Daniele Orlandi (14:39)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Tom Lane (15:08)
Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Rod Taylor (15:09)
Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
mlw (15:15)
Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Tom Lane (15:18)
Re: configure in snapshout == configure.in
Tom Lane (15:29)
Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Adam Lang (16:24)
Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SETCLIENT_ENCODING"
Thomas Lockhart (16:42)
Re: [HACKERS] PHP and PostgreSQL
Karl DeBisschop (16:45)
Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Frank Joerdens (17:03)
Creating locales.
Tim Uckun (17:18)
Re: Permissions on Stored Procedures ==> current_user
jmoschet (17:41)
Re: configure in snapshout == configure.in
Peter Eisentraut (18:44)
Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Adam Lang (18:46)
Re: configure in snapshout == configure.in
Tom Lane (18:47)
Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SETCLIENT_ENCODING"
Kevin Lo (20:16)
Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Adam Lang (21:30)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Tom Lane (21:50)
Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Frank Joerdens (22:22)
Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Frank Joerdens (22:22)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Brent Verner (23:05)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Tom Lane (23:10)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Brent Verner (23:35)
Re: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING"
Tatsuo Ishii (23:36)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Tom Lane (23:44)
2000-12-28
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Brent Verner (00:38)
[patch] src/include/storage/s_lock.h
Brent Verner (00:48)
Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Tom Lane (01:02)
Re: [HACKERS] PHP and PostgreSQL
Adam Haberlach (01:58)
Re: Alpha tas() patch
Tom Lane (02:37)
Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Tom Lane (02:45)
Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Brent Verner (05:05)
Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Oliver Elphick (07:59)
Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Tom Lane (08:10)
Re: [PATCHES] Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Oliver Elphick (08:24)
AW: configure in snapshout == configure.in
Zeugswetter Andreas SB (09:14)
New WAL version (CRC & data pages backup)
Vadim Mikheev (13:51)
Re: Alpha tas() patch
Brent Verner (14:35)
Re: Re: Alpha tas() patch
Adriaan Joubert (15:03)
Re: Alpha tas() patch
Tom Lane (15:48)
Re: Re: Alpha tas() patch
Brent Verner (16:06)
Re: Re: Alpha tas() patch
Tom Lane (16:16)
Re: Alpha tas() patch
Brent Verner (16:54)
Possible SELECT bug in 7.0.2
Jean-Louis Leroy (17:32)
Re: Alpha tas() patch
Tom Lane (17:41)
Re: configure in snapshout == configure.in
Peter Eisentraut (17:57)
Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Tom Lane (20:54)
Connecting across internet
Patrick Dunford (20:56)
Re: Alpha tas() patch
Brent Verner (21:10)
Re: Alpha tas() patch
Tom Lane (21:33)
Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Nathan Myers (21:47)
RE: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Mikheev, Vadim (21:56)
Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Tom Lane (22:06)
RE: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Mikheev, Vadim (22:11)
Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Tom Lane (22:12)
Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Nathan Myers (23:17)
Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Dominic J. Eidson (23:26)
2000-12-29
Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Nathan Myers (00:10)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Ryan Kirkpatrick (01:55)
Re: Alpha tas() patch
Brent Verner (02:45)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Tom Lane (02:47)
Re: Alpha tas() patch
Tom Lane (04:08)
Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Tom Lane (04:45)
Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Alfred Perlstein (04:58)
Re: Alpha tas() patch
Brent Verner (04:58)
Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Tom Lane (05:32)
Re: vacuum crash on 6.5.3
Tatsuo Ishii (14:16)
Re: Upper limit on number of buffers?
Michael J Schout (17:29)
RE: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Mikheev, Vadim (18:54)
Re: [HACKERS] About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING"
Bruce Momjian (19:00)
Notify with Rules bugs?
sergiop (19:58)
Re: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Nathan Myers (20:02)
RE: Assuming that TAS() will succeed the first time is verboten
Mikheev, Vadim (20:20)
pgsql/src (Makefile.global.in)
tgl (20:39)
pg_dump problem
Matthew (21:22)
Re: [HACKERS] Notify with Rules bugs?
Tom Lane (22:09)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
The Hermit Hacker (22:10)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Alfred Perlstein (22:12)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Dominic J. Eidson (22:15)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
The Hermit Hacker (22:17)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Lamar Owen (22:20)
Regress-test failure in current sources
Tom Lane (22:41)
Re: NULLS and <> : Discrepancies ?
Thomas Lockhart (22:56)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Tom Lane (23:43)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
The Hermit Hacker (23:49)
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Alfred Perlstein (23:51)
Prev
|
Next
Jump to day:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Privacy Policy
|
About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group