Search

Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers since 1998-07-03 00:00

Search archives
	(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)	Advanced Search

Prev | Next

1998-07-03

• Re: [HACKERS] no answer to Solaris 2.6 failure to build 6.3.2? Tom Lane (01:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] no answer to Solaris 2.6 failure to build 6.3.2? t-ishii (01:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] no answer to Solaris 2.6 failure to build 6.3.2? Tom Lane (01:50)
• implementing outer joins Brett McCormick (02:35)
• you are lost in a maze of twisting code, all alike Brett McCormick (03:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] implementing outer joins Bruce Momjian (04:08)
• Re: (postgres) Libpq Win32 Bruce Momjian (04:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] no answer to Solaris 2.6 failure to build 6.3.2? Maarten Boekhold (07:44)
• are BLOBs deleted that are not referenced? David Wetzel (09:28)
• Access & Postgres Sferacarta Software (10:02)
• RE: [HACKERS] implementing outer joins Stupor Genius (14:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: (postgres) Libpq Win32 Roberto Joao Lopes Garcia (14:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: (postgres) Libpq Win32 Tom Lane (15:09)
• RE: [HACKERS] Re: (postgres) Libpq Win32 Magnus Hagander (16:20)
• MySQL and PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian (20:09)

1998-07-04

• Re: [PG95-DEV] Rule system Bruce Momjian (23:57)

1998-07-05

• Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Bruce Momjian (00:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] are BLOBs deleted that are not referenced? Peter T Mount (10:06)
• JDBC Driver Development Hitch Peter T Mount (10:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Tom Lane (16:05)

1998-07-06

• Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Bruce Momjian (01:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Revised proposal for libpq and FE/BE protocol changes Bruce Momjian (01:35)
• postgresql snapshot on ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/ David Maclean (06:15)
• Information about user`s procces:username and his sql-request? Alexzander Blashko (09:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] Information about user`s procces:username and his sql-request? Bruce Momjian (09:57)
• New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc Tom Lane (20:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres David Hartwig (20:30)
• Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend? Tom Lane (22:18)

1998-07-07

• Re: Need your comments/help The Hermit Hacker (12:58)
• Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union Thomas G. Lockhart (15:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend? Bruce Momjian (17:27)
• Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"? Stuart Rison (18:12)
• Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union Bruce Momjian (18:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend? Tom Lane (20:56)
• Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"? James Olin Oden (21:07)
• Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"? Bruce Momjian (21:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend? Bruce Momjian (22:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union Brett McCormick (22:27)
• Trouble in paradise: cancel via postmaster ain't so cool Tom Lane (22:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union Tom Lane (23:04)

1998-07-08

• Re: [HACKERS] Trouble in paradise: cancel via postmaster ain't so cool Henry B. Hotz (00:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union Thomas G. Lockhart (01:39)
• PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Dr. Armin Schloesser (07:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Dr. Michael Meskes (08:36)
• Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"? Stuart Rison (11:36)
• Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"? Herouth Maoz (12:27)
• Re[2]: [GENERAL] COALESCE() or NVL() Sferacarta Software (13:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] Trouble in paradise: cancel via postmaster ain't so cool Tom Lane (13:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres David Hartwig (16:01)
• Re: [PG95-DEV] Rule system Jan Wieck (18:34)
• Some items for the TODO list Tom Lane (23:26)

1998-07-09

• Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list ocie (01:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Bruce Momjian (03:32)
• Re: [GENERAL] translate "bug"? Bruce Momjian (04:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Thomas G. Lockhart (04:41)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres Thomas G. Lockhart (04:49)
• Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart (05:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Armin Schloesser (06:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc David Gould (07:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Dr. Michael Meskes (09:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Oliver Elphick (13:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Thomas G. Lockhart (13:21)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres Thomas G. Lockhart (13:30)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres David Hartwig (13:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Armin Schloesser (13:56)
• InitPostgres() fails through libpq Egon Schmid (14:17)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres Thomas G. Lockhart (14:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Maarten Boekhold (14:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95-DEV] Rule system Bruce Momjian (15:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] New s_lock.h fails on HPUX with gcc Tom Lane (15:16)
• Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian (15:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Bruce Momjian (15:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Tom Lane (15:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Bruce Momjian (15:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Tom (17:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Tom (17:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Jan Wieck (18:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Bruce Momjian (18:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Tom Lane (19:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] Some items for the TODO list Tom Lane (19:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Which signal to use for CANCEL from postmaster to backend? Massimo Dal Zotto (21:01)
• Leaving for vacation Dr. Michael Meskes (22:10)

1998-07-10

• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle Thomas G. Lockhart (05:37)
• Constraints in PostgreSQL David Maclean (06:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Constraints in PostgreSQL Vadim Mikheev (07:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Leaving for vacation The Hermit Hacker (11:36)

1998-07-11

• Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart (13:55)

1998-07-12

• db/dbm-emulation Goran Thyni (13:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Re: FE/BE protocol revision patcht Bruce Momjian (22:04)

1998-07-13

• atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian (02:51)
• subscribe Davide Libenzi (10:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change David Hartwig (12:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Tom Lane (13:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian (13:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian (13:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port The Hermit Hacker (14:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian (14:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Thomas G. Lockhart (14:54)
• HPUX Port Davide Libenzi (15:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian (15:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian (15:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Tom Lane (15:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port Tom Lane (15:45)
• Re: Problems with your patch (Sorry). Bruce Momjian (18:59)
• Re: [BUGS] SQL optimisation dead loop Bruce Momjian (19:06)
• Sequence objects have no global currval operator? Tom Lane (20:29)
• Anyone working on optimizing subset min/max queries? Tom Lane (20:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Anyone working on optimizing subset min/max queries? Bruce Momjian (21:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Sequence objects have no global currval operator? Bruce Momjian (21:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] Sequence objects have no global currval operator? Tom Lane (22:02)

1998-07-14

• Re: [GENERAL] more nodeError problems and general view failures! Bruce Momjian (00:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port The Hermit Hacker (00:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port Tom Lane (01:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port Bruce Momjian (02:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Brandon Ibach (03:39)
• Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart (04:14)
• Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian (04:35)
• Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian (04:55)
• Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian (04:58)
• Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian (05:02)
• Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart (05:21)
• AW: [HACKERS] Sequence objects have no global currval operator? Andreas Zeugswetter (08:18)
• Q about read committed in Oracle... Vadim Mikheev (11:04)
• Q about read committed in Oracle... Vadim Mikheev (11:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Tatsuo Ishii (13:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port Vince Vielhaber (13:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port The Hermit Hacker (13:28)
• Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart (13:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian (13:42)
• Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian (13:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] HPUX Port Tom Lane (14:10)
• Re: AW: [HACKERS] Sequence objects have no global currval operator? Tom Lane (14:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Recent updates [to union] Andreas Zeugswetter (14:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Thomas G. Lockhart (15:09)
• Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart (15:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change] Bruce Momjian (15:37)
• Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian (17:01)
• EXPLAIN doesn't explain operations on inheritance trees Tom Lane (17:48)
• SEQUENCES and COPY FROM Mike Embry (20:37)
• "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Tom Lane (21:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() David Gould (22:50)

1998-07-15

• Re: [HACKERS] SEQUENCES and COPY FROM Vadim Mikheev (02:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Vadim Mikheev (02:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Bruce Momjian (02:45)
• FW: MaxQuery Plan Dirk Elmendorf (03:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Vadim Mikheev (03:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Bruce Momjian (03:48)
• two records with same oid, freak accident? Brett McCormick (03:49)
• more on phantom record Brett McCormick (03:57)
• Re: [INTERFACES][HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Herouth Maoz (10:04)
• Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart (13:15)
• Re: [INTERFACES][HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change Bruce Momjian (14:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] EXPLAIN doesn't explain operations on inheritance trees Bruce Momjian (15:10)
• Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian (15:32)
• Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart (16:26)
• Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian (16:31)
• AW: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Andreas Zeugswetter (16:39)
• Re: Recent updates Bruce Momjian (17:04)
• Re: Recent updates Thomas G. Lockhart (17:06)
• Re: AW: [HACKERS] "internal error" triggered by EXISTS() Vadim Mikheev (17:53)
• Current sources dump core on COPY IN/OUT Tom Lane (18:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Current sources dump core on COPY IN/OUT Bruce Momjian (18:52)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Hannu Krosing (19:52)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian (20:23)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Vadim Mikheev (20:25)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian (20:39)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 David Hartwig (20:40)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian (21:02)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 David Hartwig (22:16)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian (23:39)
• proposals for LLL, part 1 Vadim Mikheev (23:46)

1998-07-16

• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian (01:22)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Maarten Boekhold (07:45)
• [BUG?] strange PQgetisnull Park, Chul-Su (08:10)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Hannu Krosing (08:30)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Hannu Krosing (08:41)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Vadim Mikheev (08:51)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Aleksey Dashevsky (10:35)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Hannu Krosing (10:56)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Thomas G. Lockhart (13:36)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Thomas G. Lockhart (13:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] [BUG?] strange PQgetisnull Tom Lane (14:11)
• How about re-moderating pgsql-announce? Tom Lane (14:40)
• Large objects buffer leak andre (14:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] [BUG?] strange PQgetisnull Bruce Momjian (15:27)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian (15:33)
• [QUESTIONS] slow "select lo_unlink(..) where ...;" ? Park, Chul-Su (15:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Bruce Momjian (16:14)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Peter T Mount (17:27)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Peter T Mount (17:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] How about re-moderating pgsql-announce? ocie (18:10)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 David Gould (18:29)
• Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] changes in 6.4 Bruce Momjian (18:37)
• Re: [GENERAL] COALESCE() or NVL() Summer (21:15)

1998-07-17

• aborting create table in the middle of process t-ishii (01:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Vadim Mikheev (04:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Bruce Momjian (04:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Vadim Mikheev (04:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Vadim Mikheev (05:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 Bruce Momjian (05:15)

Prev | Next