Skip site navigation
(1)
Skip section navigation
(2)
Search
Peripheral Links
Text Size:
Normal
/
Large
Donate
Contact
Home
About
Download
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Your account
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
User lists
Developer lists
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-hackers
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-www
Regional lists
Associations
User groups
Project lists
Inactive lists
IRC
Featured Users
International Sites
Propaganda
Resources
Weekly News
pgsql-hackers since 1998-06-08 00:00
Search archives
(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)
Advanced Search
Prev
|
Next
Jump to day:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1998-06-08
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS
Bruce Momjian (02:48)
Should I run regression tests?
Doug Lo (03:21)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
The Hermit Hacker (04:01)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
Bruce Momjian (04:19)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
The Hermit Hacker (04:29)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
Bruce Momjian (04:34)
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS
Steve Logue (04:39)
UnixWare 7 port (corrected intro text).
Billy G. Allie (04:39)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...?
Vadim Mikheev (06:37)
[question]postgreSQL....
Tak Woohyun (07:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Need some help on code
Maarten Boekhold (07:34)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
Herouth Maoz (07:44)
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS
Oleg Broytmann (10:34)
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS
Jose' Soares Da Silva (11:21)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
The Hermit Hacker (11:34)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
The Hermit Hacker (11:40)
Re: [HACKERS] CGI with lilbpq
Alexzander Blashko (13:03)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections
Massimo Dal Zotto (14:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Need some help on code
Bruce Momjian (15:16)
Re: [HACKERS] backend now show status in 'ps'
Massimo Dal Zotto (15:17)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
Doug Lo (15:26)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections
Massimo Dal Zotto (15:26)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
Doug Lo (15:27)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...?
Bruce Momjian (15:29)
Re: [HACKERS] backend now show status in 'ps'
Oleg Broytmann (15:36)
bool exported to user namespace
Ewan Mellor (15:56)
Re: [HACKERS] backend now show status in 'ps'
Bruce Momjian (16:04)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections
Bruce Momjian (16:05)
Cancel key now ready
Bruce Momjian (16:24)
Re: Cancel key now ready
Tom Lane (16:57)
[HACKERS] Upgrade improvements.
mark metzger (17:03)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
mark metzger (17:19)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests?
The Hermit Hacker (17:26)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Bruce Momjian (18:14)
Re: Cancel key now ready
Tom Lane (18:55)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Egon Schmid (19:11)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Bruce Momjian (19:13)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Bruce Momjian (19:29)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Tom Lane (19:29)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Egon Schmid (19:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Bruce Momjian (19:34)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Bruce Momjian (19:37)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections
The Hermit Hacker (19:58)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Egon Schmid (20:10)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Bruce Momjian (20:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Tom Lane (20:18)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Egon Schmid (20:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Bruce Momjian (21:50)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Bruce Momjian (21:55)
Re: [HACKERS] Need some help on code
David Gould (22:12)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections
David Gould (22:22)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Bruce Momjian (22:28)
1998-06-09
Re: [HACKERS] Need some help on code
Maarten Boekhold (08:20)
Postmaster not starting
Egon Schmid (09:22)
M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs
Jose' Soares Da Silva (10:18)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...?
Jose' Soares Da Silva (10:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster not starting
The Hermit Hacker (11:39)
Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs
Byron Nikolaidis (13:16)
Re: CGI with lilbpq
ADM. Diego Cueva (13:38)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...?
David Hartwig (13:44)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...?
Vadim Mikheev (13:54)
maximum of postgres ?
Fernezelyi Marton (14:01)
Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster not starting
Egon Schmid (14:38)
Re: [INTERFACES] M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs
Jose' Soares Da Silva (14:42)
Re: [HACKERS] maximum of postgres ?
Vadim Mikheev (14:59)
Re: [GENERAL] Missing SQL Syntax & Problem with Create Table
Jose' Soares Da Silva (15:08)
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs
Byron Nikolaidis (15:12)
Re: Row-level lock
Vadim Mikheev (15:47)
Re: [INTERFACES] M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs
Byron Nikolaidis (15:55)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...?
Bruce Momjian (16:42)
Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster not starting
Bruce Momjian (16:48)
Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster not starting
Bruce Momjian (17:13)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...?
Bruce Momjian (17:25)
Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs
Jose' Soares Da Silva (17:25)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...?
Bruce Momjian (17:27)
Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster not starting
Bruce Momjian (17:30)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready
Bruce Momjian (19:20)
Table corrupt?
Brandon Ibach (20:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt?
Bruce Momjian (20:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt?
Brandon Ibach (21:13)
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt?
Bruce Momjian (21:16)
now 6.4
Bruce Momjian (23:01)
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt?
Brandon Ibach (23:07)
Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention
David Gould (23:09)
1998-06-10
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt?
Brandon Ibach (01:10)
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt?
Brandon Ibach (01:37)
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt?
Brandon Ibach (01:58)
Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention
Bruce Momjian (04:39)
Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention
David Gould (05:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention
Matthew N. Dodd (07:24)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention
David Gould (07:56)
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs
Jose' Soares Da Silva (09:27)
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs
Byron Nikolaidis (15:15)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention
Bruce Momjian (16:50)
Timestamp field
Byron Nikolaidis (17:19)
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs
Byron Nikolaidis (17:45)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention
David Gould (18:24)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
David Gould (18:31)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
The Hermit Hacker (18:45)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention
Bruce Momjian (18:49)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Bruce Momjian (18:51)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
David Gould (19:06)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Bruce Momjian (19:10)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Bruce Momjian (19:12)
1998-06-11
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Vadim Mikheev (01:36)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
t-ishii (01:45)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Bruce Momjian (02:33)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Vadim Mikheev (03:19)
Re: FW: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Peter Mount (07:02)
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs
Jose' Soares Da Silva (10:15)
Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp field
Jose' Soares Da Silva (10:56)
Re: [HACKERS] maximum of postgres ?
David Gould (18:07)
Libpq++ and RH5.1
Sidney Traynham (21:11)
Re: [HACKERS] regular expressions from hell
David Gould (21:37)
1998-06-12
inlining
Bruce Momjian (02:58)
Upgrading (was: now 6.4)
Brandon Ibach (03:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading (was: now 6.4)
Bruce Momjian (04:40)
Re: [HACKERS] inlining
David Gould (05:08)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Thomas G. Lockhart (05:34)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
t-ishii (05:52)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Postgres-6.3.2 locale patch (fwd)
Satoshi Kinoshita (06:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Postgres-6.3.2 locale patch (fwd)
t-ishii (07:19)
AW: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Andreas Zeugswetter (07:30)
Re: [HACKERS] Libpq++ and RH5.1
Maarten Boekhold (07:47)
Re: AW: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Vadim Mikheev (07:53)
update by one transaction
Lendvary Gyorgy (08:30)
COALESCE() or NVL()
Jose' Soares Da Silva (10:53)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4
Bruce Momjian (11:31)
RE: [HACKERS] inlining
Stupor Genius (11:50)
Re: [HACKERS] inlining
Bruce Momjian (12:21)
Re: [HACKERS] S_LOCK reduced contention
Tom Lane (14:42)
dump/load
Chris Albertson (18:30)
RE: [HACKERS] inlining
Henry B. Hotz (20:19)
template names
Bruce Momjian (23:17)
1998-06-13
[QUESTIONS] builtin lo_unlink(int4)? why int4 not oid?
Park, Chul-Su (02:18)
Re: [GENERAL] COALESCE() or NVL()
rmcm (03:37)
Re: [QUESTIONS] How is PostgreSQL doing?
Bruce Momjian (04:26)
Odd behavior in regression test?
Thomas G. Lockhart (05:06)
Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Bruce Momjian (05:17)
Re: Odd behavior in regression test?
Bruce Momjian (05:22)
Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Bruce Momjian (05:31)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Odd behavior in regression test?
Bruce Momjian (05:32)
Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Vadim Mikheev (06:18)
my strftime func doesn't work. please help.
Zsolt Varga (07:08)
Re: [HACKERS] update by one transaction
David Gould (07:11)
Re: [HACKERS] [QUESTIONS] builtin lo_unlink(int4)? why int4 not oid?
Peter T Mount (09:58)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Odd behavior in regression test?
Peter T Mount (10:04)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Odd behavior in regression test?
Peter T Mount (10:05)
Re: [HACKERS] [QUESTIONS] builtin lo_unlink(int4)? why int4 not oid?
Chul Su Park (10:20)
Re: [HACKERS] [QUESTIONS] builtin lo_unlink(int4)? why int4 not oid?
Peter T Mount (11:31)
Wishlist for next version: group by clause
Edmund Mergl (18:07)
Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Bruce Momjian (20:18)
Re: [HACKERS] [QUESTIONS] builtin lo_unlink(int4)? why int4 not oid?
Bruce Momjian (20:26)
Re: [HACKERS] my strftime func doesn't work. please help.
David Gould (20:49)
PL/Perl
Edwin S. Ramirez (21:30)
1998-06-14
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
David Gould (01:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Bruce Momjian (02:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
David Gould (02:59)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Brett McCormick (03:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state
Vadim Mikheev (06:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Odd behavior in regression test?
Bruce Momjian (22:11)
performance tests, initial results
David Gould (22:35)
1998-06-15
Re: [HACKERS] performance tests, initial results
Vadim Mikheev (01:09)
subscribe
Vassilis Papadimos (10:11)
Need help understanding unique indices (fwd)
Marc Howard Zuckman (15:53)
Re: [HACKERS] template portname problems
Bruce Momjian (17:46)
removal of braces
Bruce Momjian (19:16)
Revised Optimized S_LOCK patch
David Gould (20:26)
Re: [HACKERS] removal of braces
Bruce Momjian (20:55)
Re: [HACKERS] removal of braces
David Gould (20:59)
Re: [HACKERS] template portname problems
Bruce Momjian (21:00)
RE: [HACKERS] Need help understanding unique indices (fwd)
Jackson, DeJuan (21:21)
Re: [HACKERS] removal of braces
Tom Lane (21:24)
Re: [HACKERS] User authentification failed
Byron Nikolaidis (21:38)
User authentification failed
Dmitry Samersoff (21:59)
Re: [HACKERS] S_LOCK reduced contention
David Gould (22:27)
Re: [HACKERS] User authentification failed
David Hartwig (23:15)
seq scan only when function not in subquery (bug?)
Brett McCormick (23:44)
1998-06-16
Re: [HACKERS] seq scan only when function not in subquery (bug?)
Vadim Mikheev (02:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Bug or Short between my brain and the keyboard?
Bruce Momjian (02:37)
Re: [QUESTIONS] How to use memory instead of hd?
Bruce Momjian (02:38)
Re: [QUESTIONS] errors on transactions and locks ?
Bruce Momjian (02:43)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] copy command
Bruce Momjian (02:47)
Re: [HACKERS] non-functional update notice unneccesarily
Bruce Momjian (02:51)
Re: [BUGS] Small bug in union
Bruce Momjian (02:58)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump error
Bruce Momjian (03:19)
Re: [PORTS] Linux/Alpha.... Progress...
Bruce Momjian (04:02)
Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] ipaddr data type - EXTENDED VERSION HERE]
Bruce Momjian (04:32)
Re: [PATCHES] Postgres-6.3.2 locale patch
t-ishii (04:47)
Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] ipaddr data type - EXTENDED VERSION HERE]
David Gould (05:35)
Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] ipaddr data type - EXTENDED VERSION HERE]
Bruce Momjian (05:39)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Re: FE/BE protocol revision patch
Bruce Momjian (05:54)
Re: [HACKERS] removal of braces
Bruce Momjian (07:22)
Re: [HACKERS] removal of braces
Bruce Momjian (07:23)
Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
Bruce Momjian (07:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Current sources?
David Gould (08:20)
Re: [HACKERS] User authentification failed
Jose' Soares Da Silva (11:00)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump error
Jose' Soares Da Silva (11:18)
AW: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] How to use memory instead of hd?
Andreas Zeugswetter (11:56)
All patches applied
Bruce Momjian (15:15)
Prev
|
Next
Jump to day:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Privacy Policy
|
About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group