Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open source database.

pgsql-hackers since 1998-06-05 00:00

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

1998-06-05

Wanted Home Product Assemblers USA Publishing Co. (00:43)
Standard Deviation function. Chris Albertson (01:20)
RE: [HACKERS] Standard Deviation function. Stupor Genius (01:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Standard Deviation function. Bruce Momjian (01:55)
RE: [HACKERS] Standard Deviation function. Stupor Genius (03:22)
Re: [HACKERS] Standard Deviation function. Bruce Momjian (03:24)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections David Gould (05:00)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Postgres-6.3.2 locale patch (fwd) David Gould (05:40)
Re: libpgtcl bug (and symptomatic treatment) Magosanyi Arpad (06:37)
Re: [PATCHES] Postgres-6.3.2 locale patch Oleg Broytmann (06:39)
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS Michael Meskes (06:56)
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS Michael Meskes (06:57)
AW: [HACKERS] Standard Deviation function. Andreas Zeugswetter (08:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Standard Deviation function. David Gould (08:15)
Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS Maarten Boekhold (08:36)
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS David Gould (08:40)
Re: [HACKERS] Standard Deviation function. Andreas Zeugswetter (08:43)
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS Maarten Boekhold (08:43)
Perl Standard Deviation function is wrong ! Andreas Zeugswetter (10:05)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections Ulrich Voss (12:31)
Re: [HACKERS] Perl Standard Deviation function is wrong ! Brook Milligan (15:16)
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS Matthew N. Dodd (15:23)
Re: [HACKERS] Standard Deviation function. Tom Lane (15:24)
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS The Hermit Hacker (16:08)
Re: [HACKERS] Standard Deviation function. Diab Jerius (16:38)
Re: [HACKERS] CGI with lilbpq Vince Vielhaber (16:56)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections Bruce Momjian (20:56)
dfas Chris Olivier (23:13)

1998-06-06

Re: [HACKERS] Perl Standard Deviation function is wrong ! Colin Kuskie (01:41)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections The Hermit Hacker (03:03)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections David Gould (05:14)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections Vadim Mikheev (11:43)
unsubscribe Chris Olivier (15:08)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections Bruce Momjian (15:28)
v6.4 - What is planned...? The Hermit Hacker (16:01)
Re: hackers-digest V1 #843 Hannu Krosing (17:14)
CGI with lilbpq ADM. Diego Cueva (17:28)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? Bruce Momjian (21:32)

1998-06-07

Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? Peter T Mount (16:41)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? Bruce Momjian (17:10)
Need some help on code Maarten Boekhold (19:27)
Re: [HACKERS] Need some help on code Bruce Momjian (20:26)

1998-06-08

Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS Bruce Momjian (02:48)
Should I run regression tests? Doug Lo (03:21)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? The Hermit Hacker (04:01)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? Bruce Momjian (04:19)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? The Hermit Hacker (04:29)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? Bruce Momjian (04:34)
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS Steve Logue (04:39)
UnixWare 7 port (corrected intro text). Billy G. Allie (04:39)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? Vadim Mikheev (06:37)
[question]postgreSQL.... Tak Woohyun (07:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Need some help on code Maarten Boekhold (07:34)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? Herouth Maoz (07:44)
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS Oleg Broytmann (10:34)
Re: [HACKERS] NEW POSTGRESQL LOGOS Jose' Soares Da Silva (11:21)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? The Hermit Hacker (11:34)
Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? The Hermit Hacker (11:40)
Re: [HACKERS] CGI with lilbpq Alexzander Blashko (13:03)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections Massimo Dal Zotto (14:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Need some help on code Bruce Momjian (15:16)
Re: [HACKERS] backend now show status in 'ps' Massimo Dal Zotto (15:17)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? Doug Lo (15:26)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections Massimo Dal Zotto (15:26)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? Doug Lo (15:27)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? Bruce Momjian (15:29)
Re: [HACKERS] backend now show status in 'ps' Oleg Broytmann (15:36)
bool exported to user namespace Ewan Mellor (15:56)
Re: [HACKERS] backend now show status in 'ps' Bruce Momjian (16:04)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections Bruce Momjian (16:05)
Cancel key now ready Bruce Momjian (16:24)
Re: Cancel key now ready Tom Lane (16:57)
[HACKERS] Upgrade improvements. mark metzger (17:03)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? mark metzger (17:19)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Should I run regression tests? The Hermit Hacker (17:26)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Bruce Momjian (18:14)
Re: Cancel key now ready Tom Lane (18:55)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Egon Schmid (19:11)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Bruce Momjian (19:13)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Bruce Momjian (19:29)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Tom Lane (19:29)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Egon Schmid (19:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Bruce Momjian (19:34)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Bruce Momjian (19:37)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections The Hermit Hacker (19:58)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Egon Schmid (20:10)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Bruce Momjian (20:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Tom Lane (20:18)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Egon Schmid (20:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Bruce Momjian (21:50)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Bruce Momjian (21:55)
Re: [HACKERS] Need some help on code David Gould (22:12)
Re: [HACKERS] keeping track of connections David Gould (22:22)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Bruce Momjian (22:28)

1998-06-09

Re: [HACKERS] Need some help on code Maarten Boekhold (08:20)
Postmaster not starting Egon Schmid (09:22)
M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs Jose' Soares Da Silva (10:18)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? Jose' Soares Da Silva (10:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster not starting The Hermit Hacker (11:39)
Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs Byron Nikolaidis (13:16)
Re: CGI with lilbpq ADM. Diego Cueva (13:38)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? David Hartwig (13:44)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? Vadim Mikheev (13:54)
maximum of postgres ? Fernezelyi Marton (14:01)
Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster not starting Egon Schmid (14:38)
Re: [INTERFACES] M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs Jose' Soares Da Silva (14:42)
Re: [HACKERS] maximum of postgres ? Vadim Mikheev (14:59)
Re: [GENERAL] Missing SQL Syntax & Problem with Create Table Jose' Soares Da Silva (15:08)
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs Byron Nikolaidis (15:12)
Re: Row-level lock Vadim Mikheev (15:47)
Re: [INTERFACES] M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs Byron Nikolaidis (15:55)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? Bruce Momjian (16:42)
Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster not starting Bruce Momjian (16:48)
Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster not starting Bruce Momjian (17:13)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? Bruce Momjian (17:25)
Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs Jose' Soares Da Silva (17:25)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.4 - What is planned...? Bruce Momjian (17:27)
Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster not starting Bruce Momjian (17:30)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Cancel key now ready Bruce Momjian (19:20)
Table corrupt? Brandon Ibach (20:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt? Bruce Momjian (20:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt? Brandon Ibach (21:13)
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt? Bruce Momjian (21:16)
now 6.4 Bruce Momjian (23:01)
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt? Brandon Ibach (23:07)
Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention David Gould (23:09)

1998-06-10

Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt? Brandon Ibach (01:10)
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt? Brandon Ibach (01:37)
Re: [HACKERS] Table corrupt? Brandon Ibach (01:58)
Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention Bruce Momjian (04:39)
Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention David Gould (05:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention Matthew N. Dodd (07:24)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention David Gould (07:56)
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs Jose' Soares Da Silva (09:27)
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs Byron Nikolaidis (15:15)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention Bruce Momjian (16:50)
Timestamp field Byron Nikolaidis (17:19)
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs Byron Nikolaidis (17:45)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention David Gould (18:24)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 David Gould (18:31)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 The Hermit Hacker (18:45)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Try again: S_LOCK reduced contention Bruce Momjian (18:49)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 Bruce Momjian (18:51)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 David Gould (19:06)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 Bruce Momjian (19:10)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 Bruce Momjian (19:12)

1998-06-11

Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 Vadim Mikheev (01:36)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 t-ishii (01:45)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 Bruce Momjian (02:33)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 Vadim Mikheev (03:19)
Re: FW: [HACKERS] now 6.4 Peter Mount (07:02)
Re: [INTERFACES] Re: M$-Access'97 and TIMESTAMPs Jose' Soares Da Silva (10:15)
Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp field Jose' Soares Da Silva (10:56)
Re: [HACKERS] maximum of postgres ? David Gould (18:07)
Libpq++ and RH5.1 Sidney Traynham (21:11)
Re: [HACKERS] regular expressions from hell David Gould (21:37)

1998-06-12

inlining Bruce Momjian (02:58)
Upgrading (was: now 6.4) Brandon Ibach (03:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading (was: now 6.4) Bruce Momjian (04:40)
Re: [HACKERS] inlining David Gould (05:08)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 Thomas G. Lockhart (05:34)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 t-ishii (05:52)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Postgres-6.3.2 locale patch (fwd) Satoshi Kinoshita (06:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Postgres-6.3.2 locale patch (fwd) t-ishii (07:19)
AW: [HACKERS] now 6.4 Andreas Zeugswetter (07:30)
Re: [HACKERS] Libpq++ and RH5.1 Maarten Boekhold (07:47)
Re: AW: [HACKERS] now 6.4 Vadim Mikheev (07:53)
update by one transaction Lendvary Gyorgy (08:30)
COALESCE() or NVL() Jose' Soares Da Silva (10:53)
Re: [HACKERS] now 6.4 Bruce Momjian (11:31)
RE: [HACKERS] inlining Stupor Genius (11:50)
Re: [HACKERS] inlining Bruce Momjian (12:21)
Re: [HACKERS] S_LOCK reduced contention Tom Lane (14:42)
dump/load Chris Albertson (18:30)
RE: [HACKERS] inlining Henry B. Hotz (20:19)
template names Bruce Momjian (23:17)

1998-06-13

[QUESTIONS] builtin lo_unlink(int4)? why int4 not oid? Park, Chul-Su (02:18)
Re: [GENERAL] COALESCE() or NVL() rmcm (03:37)
Re: [QUESTIONS] How is PostgreSQL doing? Bruce Momjian (04:26)
Odd behavior in regression test? Thomas G. Lockhart (05:06)
Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Bruce Momjian (05:17)
Re: Odd behavior in regression test? Bruce Momjian (05:22)
Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Bruce Momjian (05:31)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Odd behavior in regression test? Bruce Momjian (05:32)
Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Vadim Mikheev (06:18)
my strftime func doesn't work. please help. Zsolt Varga (07:08)
Re: [HACKERS] update by one transaction David Gould (07:11)
Re: [HACKERS] [QUESTIONS] builtin lo_unlink(int4)? why int4 not oid? Peter T Mount (09:58)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Odd behavior in regression test? Peter T Mount (10:04)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Odd behavior in regression test? Peter T Mount (10:05)
Re: [HACKERS] [QUESTIONS] builtin lo_unlink(int4)? why int4 not oid? Chul Su Park (10:20)
Re: [HACKERS] [QUESTIONS] builtin lo_unlink(int4)? why int4 not oid? Peter T Mount (11:31)
Wishlist for next version: group by clause Edmund Mergl (18:07)
Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Bruce Momjian (20:18)
Re: [HACKERS] [QUESTIONS] builtin lo_unlink(int4)? why int4 not oid? Bruce Momjian (20:26)
Re: [HACKERS] my strftime func doesn't work. please help. David Gould (20:49)
PL/Perl Edwin S. Ramirez (21:30)

1998-06-14

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state David Gould (01:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state Bruce Momjian (02:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] NOTICE:AbortTransaction and not in in-progress state David Gould (02:59)

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group