Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Text Size: Normal / Large
Donate
Contact

PostgreSQL

The world's most advanced open source database.

pgsql-hackers before 2005-03-01 00:38

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Feb. 24, 2005

Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane (22:32)
Re: Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier (22:38)
Re: Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier (22:40)
Re: [NOVICE] Question on TRUNCATE privleges Tom Lane (22:47)
Patch for Postmaster Uptime (from the TODO) Eric Crampton (22:49)
Re: psql: recall previous command? Neil Conway (23:03)
Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Gavin Sherry (23:23)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Bruce Momjian (23:45)
Re: psql: recall previous command? Bruce Momjian (23:56)

Feb. 25, 2005

Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (00:02)
Re: psql: recall previous command? Neil Conway (00:11)
Re: psql: recall previous command? Bruce Momjian (00:24)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane (00:27)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (00:29)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (00:45)
Re: Finding if old transactions are running... Bruce Momjian (01:11)
Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane (01:34)
Re: Patch for Postmaster Uptime (from the TODO) Tom Lane (01:38)
Where to see the patch queue (was Re: Patch for Postmaster Uptime (from the TODO)) Eric Crampton (01:54)
Re: Patch for Postmaster Uptime (from the TODO) Bruce Momjian (02:48)
Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: Patch for Postmaster Bruce Momjian (02:51)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian (03:05)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane (03:18)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian (03:22)
Interesting NetBSD annual report Bruce Momjian (04:00)
Re: BUG #1466: syslogger issues Bruce Momjian (04:33)
Re: UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian (04:51)
Re: Can we remove SnapshotSelf? Bruce Momjian (04:59)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Greg Stark (05:07)
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Bruce Momjian (05:18)
Re: Finding if old transactions are running... jtv (06:22)
Re: Finding if old transactions are running... Tom Lane (06:31)
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Marc G. Fournier (06:47)
Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Neil Conway (06:48)
Re: UTF8 or Unicode Peter Eisentraut (07:02)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Peter Eisentraut (07:07)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Peter Eisentraut (07:08)
Re: Finding if old transactions are running... jtv (07:24)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (08:31)
idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (08:34)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD (08:57)
Re: UTF8 or Unicode Karel Zak (08:59)
Re: UTF8 or Unicode Peter Eisentraut (10:01)
Development Plans Simon Riggs (10:34)
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Simon Riggs (11:02)
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Simon Riggs (11:04)
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Andrew Dunstan (11:05)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Nicolai Tufar (11:08)
Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Merlin Moncure (13:07)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Simon Riggs (13:38)
Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report D'Arcy J.M. Cain (13:42)
Re: Development Plans Marc G. Fournier (14:42)
Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Francisco Figueiredo Jr. (14:44)
Re: Some download statistics Jim C. Nasby (14:52)
Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane (15:13)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane (15:18)
Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane (15:23)
Re: int64/double for time/timestamp Teodor Sigaev (15:25)
Re: UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian (15:26)
Re: int64/double for time/timestamp Tom Lane (15:28)
Re: UTF8 or Unicode Tom Lane (15:33)
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Bruce Momjian (15:36)
Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report Jim C. Nasby (15:39)
Re: Development Plans Bruce Momjian (15:40)
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane (15:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Bruce Momjian (15:49)
Re: Development Plans Robert Treat (16:06)
Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Christopher Kings-Lynne (16:09)
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Matthew T. O'Connor (16:20)
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Bruce Momjian (16:21)
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane (16:24)
Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Matthew T. O'Connor (16:24)
Re: UTF8 or Unicode Peter Eisentraut (16:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Jim C. Nasby (16:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Tom Lane (16:36)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Peter Eisentraut (16:37)
Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Peter Eisentraut (16:40)
Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Tom Lane (17:02)
Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Christopher Kings-Lynne (17:11)
Re: Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier (17:18)
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Marc G. Fournier (17:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report Marc G. Fournier (17:27)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (17:36)
Re: Development Plans Josh Berkus (17:41)
Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.4988 (21 messages) Josh Berkus (17:48)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Tom Lane (17:54)
Re: Development schedule Tom Lane (17:59)
Re: Development schedule Josh Berkus (18:03)
Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.4988 (21 messages) Peter Eisentraut (18:05)
Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Markus Schaber (18:08)
Re: Development schedule Marc G. Fournier (18:10)
Re: Development schedule Marc G. Fournier (18:11)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (18:17)
Re: Development schedule Josh Berkus (18:18)
Re: Development schedule Tom Lane (18:19)
Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Markus Schaber (18:21)
Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.4988 (21 messages) Marc G. Fournier (18:21)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane (18:25)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (18:26)
Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane (18:28)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Tom Lane (18:30)
Re: Development schedule Marc G. Fournier (18:33)
Re: UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian (18:36)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen (18:38)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane (19:17)
CAN-2005-0247 yo mero (19:29)
Re: Development schedule Tom Lane (19:34)
Re: CAN-2005-0247 Tom Lane (19:40)
Boolean operationsengineer1 (20:02)
Re: Boolean Tom Lane (20:12)
Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report Jim C. Nasby (20:44)
Re: CAN-2005-0247 yo mero (20:48)
Re: [HACKERS] Interesting NetBSD annual report Marc G. Fournier (21:41)
Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Bruce Momjian (21:48)
Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Bruce Momjian (21:52)
Re: Development schedule Bruce Momjian (22:00)
Re: Development schedule Tom Lane (22:04)
Re: Development schedule Bruce Momjian (22:09)
Modifying COPY TO Dave Held (22:19)
Re: Modifying COPY TO Tom Lane (22:56)
Re: Modifying COPY TO Stephen Frost (23:03)

Feb. 26, 2005

Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jim C. Nasby (00:03)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (00:04)
Re: Modifying COPY TO Jim C. Nasby (00:11)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (00:30)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Bruce Momjian (01:51)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Bruce Momjian (01:52)
Re: Modifying COPY TO Bruce Momjian (01:55)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jim C. Nasby (02:35)
Re: Modifying COPY TO Andrew - Supernews (04:07)
Re: Modifying COPY TO Tom Lane (04:46)
Re: Development Plans Jeff Hoffmann (04:48)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Tom Lane (04:51)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jim C. Nasby (05:49)
Re: Development Plans Chris Travers (05:50)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (08:22)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans William Volkman (10:28)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Neil Conway (12:08)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Neil Conway (12:39)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Andrew Dunstan (12:45)
Re: Development schedule Andrew Dunstan (13:13)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Tom Lane (15:47)
Re: Development Plans Tom Lane (15:57)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jim C. Nasby (16:16)
Re: Development schedule Joshua D. Drake (18:47)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (19:02)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis (19:05)
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian (20:50)
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode lsunley (23:08)
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode lsunley (23:49)
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode lsunley (23:56)

Feb. 27, 2005

Re: win32 performance - fsync question Bruce Momjian (00:54)
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian (00:55)
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian (01:07)
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian (04:09)
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode lsunley (04:50)
Re: [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode lsunley (04:53)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Neil Conway (05:53)
Re: win32 performance - fsync question Michael Paesold (10:47)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Magnus Hagander (11:15)
Re: win32 performance - fsync question Magnus Hagander (11:26)
Re: win32 performance - fsync question Michael Paesold (13:46)
snprintf causes regression tests to fail Magnus Hagander (18:07)
Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Dave Page (19:52)
Re: Development Plans Simon Riggs (20:01)
Re: Development Plans Josh Berkus (20:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Some download statistics Josh Berkus (21:30)
Re: [HACKERS] Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier (22:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Some download statistics Josh Berkus (22:43)
Re: [HACKERS] Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier (23:30)

Feb. 28, 2005

Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Neil Conway (00:22)
Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Pavel Stehule (02:29)
Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Evgen Potemkin (08:07)
serial as FK ? Oleg Bartunov (09:26)
Re: serial as FK ? Richard Huxton (09:46)
Re: [HACKERS] Development Plans Simone Brunozzi (10:34)
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (13:27)
Re: serial as FK ? Oleg Bartunov (14:17)
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian (14:17)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Gaetano Mendola (14:35)
Re: Problems With PGAdmin Andreas Pflug (17:43)
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail pgsql (17:54)
Re: serial as FK ? Stephan Szabo (18:09)
Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries David Fetter (18:44)
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (19:42)
bitmap AM design Victor Y. Yegorov (19:49)
Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (19:51)
Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Mike Benoit (20:02)
Re: SQL99 Hierarchical queries Pavel Stehule (20:08)
Re: serial as FK ? Oleg Bartunov (20:16)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian (20:35)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (20:58)
Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian (21:29)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (22:40)
Re: [PATCHES] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian (22:41)
Vacuum time degrading Wes (23:02)
Thread-safe snprintf() vsnprintf() and printf() Nicolai Tufar (23:22)
Re: Development Plans Greg Sabino Mullane (23:33)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Simon Riggs (23:47)
Re: Development Plans Josh Berkus (23:57)

Prev | Next

Jump to day: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group