Peripheral Links

• Home
• About
• Download
• Documentation
• Community
• Developers
• Support
• Your account

pgsql-hackers before 2000-11-01 00:16

2000-10-27

• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (20:07)
• (forw) Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (20:11)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (20:14)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (20:16)
• Re: [GENERAL] A rare error Kevin O'Gorman (20:40)
• Can't import date using copy Guy Fraser (20:43)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Alex Pilosov (20:47)
• Re: [GENERAL] A rare error Kevin O'Gorman (20:58)
• Proposal for DROP TABLE rollback mechanism Tom Lane (21:21)
• Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb Peter Eisentraut (21:30)
• Re: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments Tom Lane (21:33)
• Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb Tom Lane (21:36)
• Re: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments Philip Warner (21:50)
• Re: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments Don Baccus (21:57)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (22:03)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Bruce Momjian (22:06)
• Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb] Bruce Momjian (22:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re:RPM dependencies (Was: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)) Bruce Momjian (22:15)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (22:24)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Lamar Owen (22:25)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (22:29)
• Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb Peter Eisentraut (22:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re:RPM dependencies (Was: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)) Lamar Owen (22:33)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Bruce Momjian (22:36)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (22:37)
• Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb Tom Lane (22:40)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (22:41)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Alex Pilosov (22:42)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (22:43)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (22:54)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (22:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re:RPM dependencies (Was: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)) Bruce Momjian (23:08)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Alex Pilosov (23:17)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Alex Pilosov (23:20)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (23:39)

2000-10-28

• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (00:06)
• Notice: rpath in use Peter Eisentraut (00:20)
• Problem with installing as root Kevin O'Gorman (00:58)
• Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling. Kevin O'Gorman (01:11)
• Second proposal: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (01:45)
• Re: Second proposal: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (02:07)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Alex Pilosov (02:20)
• Zoltan, call home! Thomas Lockhart (02:21)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (02:27)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Alex Pilosov (02:36)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (02:53)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (03:04)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Larry Rosenman (03:06)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Alex Pilosov (03:08)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Alex Pilosov (03:27)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Alex Pilosov (03:39)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] A rare error Alex Pilosov (03:57)
• Re: Can't import date using copy Tom Lane (04:03)
• Re: Can't import date using copy Stephan Szabo (04:12)
• Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling. Tom Lane (04:55)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] A rare error Tom Lane (05:15)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] A rare error Tom Lane (05:32)
• rule on insert Razvan Radu (10:55)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Peter Eisentraut (12:13)
• Re: Second proposal: what to do about INET/CIDR Peter Eisentraut (12:21)
• Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) Philip Warner (13:34)
• Re: Problem with installing as root Peter Eisentraut (14:40)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Peter Eisentraut (14:55)
• Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling. Bruce Momjian (15:44)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Larry Rosenman (15:52)
• Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR Dominic J. Eidson (16:17)
• Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb Peter Eisentraut (16:20)
• Re: Second proposal: what to do about INET/CIDR Tom Lane (16:31)
• Re: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) Tom Lane (16:35)
• Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling. Larry Rosenman (16:38)
• Re: Idea: cross-check versions during initdb Tom Lane (16:38)
• Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling. Tom Lane (16:41)
• Location of client header files Timothy H. Keitt (16:59)
• Re: Proposal for DROP TABLE rollback mechanism Vadim Mikheev (17:38)
• Re: Proposal for DROP TABLE rollback mechanism Tom Lane (17:52)
• Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling. The Hermit Hacker (18:17)
• Re: Proposal for DROP TABLE rollback mechanism Vadim Mikheev (18:40)
• Re: syntax Kevin O'Gorman (18:48)
• Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling. Kevin O'Gorman (19:12)
• Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling. Bruce Momjian (19:41)
• Re: syntax Tom Lane (20:41)
• Numeric file names Bruce Momjian (20:52)
• Re: syntax Bruce Momjian (20:54)
• Re: Proposal for DROP TABLE rollback mechanism Tom Lane (20:57)
• Re: Numeric file names Peter Eisentraut (21:58)
• Re: Numeric file names Bruce Momjian (22:07)
• Re: Numeric file names Bruce Momjian (22:08)
• Re: Proposal for DROP TABLE rollback mechanism Vadim Mikheev (22:39)
• Re: Numeric file names Vadim Mikheev (22:44)

2000-10-29

• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Tatsuo Ishii (01:17)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Larry Rosenman (01:23)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Larry Rosenman (01:36)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Tom Lane (03:13)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Larry Rosenman (03:18)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Tom Lane (03:22)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Larry Rosenman (03:24)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Larry Rosenman (03:24)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Larry Rosenman (03:38)
• initdb.sh fix... Larry Rosenman (03:49)
• Re: initdb.sh fix... Peter Eisentraut (11:43)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Peter Eisentraut (11:50)
• RE: pgsql/src/backend/nodes (copyfuncs.c outfuncs.c print.c) Hiroshi Inoue (13:39)
• Handler for plpgsql out of date? Philip Warner (14:23)
• BAR now and with 7.1 Martin A. Marques (14:27)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Larry Rosenman (14:33)
• Re: Handler for plpgsql out of date? Tom Lane (14:57)
• regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources/multibyte. Larry Rosenman (15:09)
• CC not getting -O passed? Larry Rosenman (15:20)
• READ THIS: changes in mailing list ... The Hermit Hacker (15:36)
• Optimization Rodrigo Castro (16:11)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Peter Eisentraut (16:34)
• Re: more multibyte/After TGL... Larry Rosenman (17:55)
• More cvs branch problems Bruce Momjian (18:12)
• checking new server ... The Hermit Hacker (18:45)
• another try Marc G. Fournier (20:33)
• Re: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources Larry Rosenman (20:51)
• Re: another try The Hermit Hacker (21:01)
• Re: CC not getting -O passed? Larry Rosenman (21:01)
• its too quiet scrappy (22:25)
• okay, retry this one ... The Hermit Hacker (23:17)
• hrmmmm ... ignore ... The Hermit Hacker (23:21)

2000-10-30

• Re: I believe it will (was Re: Hmm, will this do?) Kevin O'Gorman (01:52)
• Re: Re: I believe it will (was Re: Hmm, will this do?) Philip Warner (03:40)
• Re: WAL status update Hiroshi Inoue (04:02)
• Re: another try Larry Rosenman (05:36)
• RE: another try Rob S. (05:41)
• Re: WAL status update Vadim Mikheev (07:10)
• pgsql (configure.in) ishii (07:17)
• Re: BIT/BIT VARYING status Adriaan Joubert (08:32)
• AW: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments Zeugswetter Andreas SB (08:34)
• Current CVS broken? Peter Mount (09:42)
• Transaction costs? Philip Warner (10:32)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Lamar Owen (15:32)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Lamar Owen (15:43)
• RE: another try Nathan Suderman (15:52)
• RE: its too quiet Rob S. (16:18)
• Re: Current CVS broken? Peter Eisentraut (16:23)
• Re: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources Peter Eisentraut (16:55)
• Re: CC not getting -O passed? Larry Rosenman (16:55)
• Re: WAL status update Peter Eisentraut (16:56)
• Re: CC not getting -O passed? Peter Eisentraut (16:58)
• Re: AW: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments Stephan Szabo (17:07)
• Re: Current CVS broken? Peter Mount (17:10)
• Unicode conversion (Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql (configure.in)) Peter Eisentraut (17:23)
• Re: Current CVS broken? Peter Eisentraut (17:57)
• CommandCounterIncrement Denis Perchine (18:19)
• Re: Current CVS broken? Peter Mount (19:10)

2000-10-31

• Re: Unicode conversion (Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql (configure.in)) Tatsuo Ishii (00:40)
• how good is PostgreSQL Arnold Gamboa (05:25)
• Re: relation ### modified while in use Hiroshi Inoue (05:29)
• Re: WAL status update The Hermit Hacker (05:41)
• Data definition for aclitem Datatype Luis Magaa (06:32)
• AW: regression failure/UnixWare7.1.1/current sources Zeugswetter Andreas SB (07:51)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Peter Eisentraut (09:46)
• Re: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments Peter Eisentraut (09:51)
• Re: Current CVS broken? Peter Eisentraut (09:55)
• Re: Data definition for aclitem Datatype Peter Eisentraut (09:57)
• Re: Re: BIT/BIT VARYING status Peter Eisentraut (10:27)
• Re: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments Philip Warner (11:43)
• Re: how good is PostgreSQL Gunnar R|nning (11:50)
• Re: Re: BIT/BIT VARYING status Adriaan Joubert (11:51)
• AW: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments Zeugswetter Andreas SB (13:14)
• Re: AW: LIMIT in DECLARE CURSOR: request for comments Philip Warner (13:23)
• Re: Re: BIT/BIT VARYING status Peter Eisentraut (14:12)
• Problem with 2 avcuums in parallel Denis Perchine (14:16)
• Re: Re: BIT/BIT VARYING status Adriaan Joubert (14:47)
• Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Lamar Owen (15:51)
• Re: Data definition for aclitem Datatype Luis Magaa (16:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Karl DeBisschop (16:28)
• PostgreSQL 7.0.2-21 RPMset available. Lamar Owen (16:29)
• Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) Lamar Owen (16:37)
• Re: how good is PostgreSQL markw (19:02)
• 7.0.2 crash (maybe linux kernel bug??) Michael J Schout (19:16)
• Re: 7.0.2 crash (maybe linux kernel bug??) Alfred Perlstein (19:59)
• Re: how good is PostgreSQL Steve Wolfe (20:02)
• Re: how good is PostgreSQL Lamar Owen (20:10)
• Re: add darwin/osxpb support to cvs Peter Eisentraut (20:15)
• Re: how good is PostgreSQL Steve Wolfe (20:18)
• Re: how good is PostgreSQL Steve Wolfe (20:30)
• RE: Restricting permissions on Unix socket Jones, Colin (20:35)
• Re: how good is PostgreSQL Kevin O'Gorman (20:50)
• Restricting permissions on Unix socket Peter Eisentraut (20:50)
• Contexts Kevin O'Gorman (21:00)
• Re: how good is PostgreSQL KuroiNeko (21:03)
• RE: WAL status update Mikheev, Vadim (21:04)
• Re: Restricting permissions on Unix socket Robert Kernell (21:36)
• Query caching Steve Wolfe (21:42)
• Re: how good is PostgreSQL Bryan White (21:49)
• Re: how good is PostgreSQL Steve Wolfe (21:58)
• Re: Query caching KuroiNeko (22:17)
• How to unsuscribe from this list? KanjiSoft Systems (22:26)
• Re: Query caching Steve Wolfe (22:41)
• RE: WAL status update Mikheev, Vadim (22:45)
• Re: WAL status update Peter Eisentraut (22:48)
• Re: Query caching Alfred Perlstein (23:01)
• Re: Restricting permissions on Unix socket Alfred Perlstein (23:02)
• Re: Query caching KuroiNeko (23:07)
• Query cache import? Alfred Perlstein (23:11)
• Re: Query caching Poul L. Christiansen (23:44)
• RE: WAL status update Mikheev, Vadim (23:45)